Sandra Friedemann

My feedback

  1. 2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Public » Meetings  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Sandra Friedemann shared this idea  · 
  2. 8 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Public » Meetings  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Sandra Friedemann supported this idea  · 
  3. 21 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    2 comments  ·  Public » Teams and Channels  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Sandra Friedemann supported this idea  · 
  4. 37 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    3 comments  ·  Public » Room Systems  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Sandra Friedemann supported this idea  · 
  5. 345 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    58 comments  ·  Public » UX/Design  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Sandra Friedemann supported this idea  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Sandra Friedemann commented  · 

    I wholly support this concept. I am taking on a new role in my organization and not everyone on the team knows who I am. To avoid 57 members getting blasted by 55 pings as people respond, when I need to ask for input it make sense to say: "In responding, please ping @myname."

  6. 344 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    12 comments  ·  Public » Live Events  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Sandra Friedemann supported this idea  · 
  7. 704 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    51 comments  ·  Public » Live Events  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Sandra Friedemann commented  · 

    AGREED!! It's disruptive if I am assigned to be a Producer and then one of the Presenters shares their desktop directly to the Live event feed. I lose control of the production and the entire thing can come apart.

    Only Producers should be able to share content - either from their computer, or content shared through the Content window at the bottom of the Producer screen.

    Sandra Friedemann supported this idea  · 
  8. 740 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    34 comments  ·  Public » Live Events  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Sandra Friedemann supported this idea  · 
  9. 2,611 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    166 comments  ·  Public » Live Events  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Sandra Friedemann supported this idea  · 
  10. 4 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Public » Live Events  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Sandra Friedemann shared this idea  · 
  11. 7 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Public » Live Events  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Sandra Friedemann shared this idea  · 
  12. 5,831 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    601 comments  ·  Public » Teams and Channels  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Sandra Friedemann supported this idea  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Sandra Friedemann commented  · 

    Why is the General channel fixed? Why cannot permissions be set on it? Why cannot the name be changed to meet your user's needs? What is it's purpose in the view of MS?

    It's a waste of space if you're highly organized, because all that channel provides is a dumping ground for the less organized to put all their stuff.

    At least give your customers the flexibility to use the Channel as they see fit instead of setting it there and making it top dog in MY Team.

  13. 8,564 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    913 comments  ·  Public » Teams and Channels  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Thank you for your feedback! The team has reviewed this request and has added it to our backlog for both Standard (Public) to Private and Private to Standard (Public) channel conversion. We will share an update as soon as it’s available.

    Sandra Friedemann supported this idea  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Sandra Friedemann commented  · 

    This is a key factor because as roles change within an organization, or as content within Channels change, it may become necessary to place restrictions on that content. As it is now, the Channel has to be deleted in order for new permissions to be set, which means the history of the communications within that Channel is lost.

Feedback and Knowledge Base