Sandra Friedemann
My feedback
-
2 votesSandra Friedemann
shared this idea
·
-
8 votesSandra Friedemann
supported this idea
·
-
21 votesSandra Friedemann
supported this idea
·
-
37 votesSandra Friedemann
supported this idea
·
-
345 votesSandra Friedemann
supported this idea
·
An error occurred while saving the comment -
344 votesSandra Friedemann
supported this idea
·
-
704 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Sandra Friedemann
commented
AGREED!! It's disruptive if I am assigned to be a Producer and then one of the Presenters shares their desktop directly to the Live event feed. I lose control of the production and the entire thing can come apart.
Only Producers should be able to share content - either from their computer, or content shared through the Content window at the bottom of the Producer screen.
Sandra Friedemann
supported this idea
·
-
740 votes
Thanks for your feedback. Mute/unmute participants for Q&A is on the backlog for Live Events. We’ll update you when we have more details.
Sandra Friedemann
supported this idea
·
-
2,611 votesSandra Friedemann
supported this idea
·
-
4 votesSandra Friedemann
shared this idea
·
-
7 votesSandra Friedemann
shared this idea
·
-
5,831 votes
As part of our commitment to being customer driven, we’d love your input on top features that will improve your satisfaction with teams and channels navigation, and help you be more productive in Teams. Please access the survey here: https://forms.office.com/Pages/ResponsePage.aspx?id=v4j5cvGGr0GRqy180BHbR7hW7rKdVrVInUSM809cvrtUNFhLRVNJVVhaUFI0WEJHVTA4MlpGWVZUSS4u
Thanks for your feedback!
Sandra Friedemann
supported this idea
·
An error occurred while saving the comment Sandra Friedemann
commented
Why is the General channel fixed? Why cannot permissions be set on it? Why cannot the name be changed to meet your user's needs? What is it's purpose in the view of MS?
It's a waste of space if you're highly organized, because all that channel provides is a dumping ground for the less organized to put all their stuff.
At least give your customers the flexibility to use the Channel as they see fit instead of setting it there and making it top dog in MY Team.
-
8,564 votes
Thank you for your feedback! The team has reviewed this request and has added it to our backlog for both Standard (Public) to Private and Private to Standard (Public) channel conversion. We will share an update as soon as it’s available.
Sandra Friedemann
supported this idea
·
An error occurred while saving the comment Sandra Friedemann
commented
This is a key factor because as roles change within an organization, or as content within Channels change, it may become necessary to place restrictions on that content. As it is now, the Channel has to be deleted in order for new permissions to be set, which means the history of the communications within that Channel is lost.
I wholly support this concept. I am taking on a new role in my organization and not everyone on the team knows who I am. To avoid 57 members getting blasted by 55 pings as people respond, when I need to ask for input it make sense to say: "In responding, please ping @myname."