Anonymous

My feedback

  1. 19,087 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1989 comments  ·  Public » Messaging  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  2. 7,525 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    822 comments  ·  Public » Teams and Channels  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Thank you for your feedback! The team has reviewed this request and has added it to our backlog for both Standard (Public) to Private and Private to Standard (Public) channel conversion. We will share an update as soon as it’s available.

    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  3. 398 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    68 comments  ·  Public » Teams and Channels  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    try this instead  ·  Warren responded

    Updating the status to “Try this instead” and have added the clarification that after 30 days the name is once again available.

    The reason for this decision was that Channels can be restored 30 days after being deleted. During this time, we intentionally don’t support creating a channel with the same name. After the 30 days, the name is available.

    You can workaround this by restoring a deleted channel, renaming it, and then deleting the channel again. The previous name is then available for use.

    This workaround has already been mentioned in the comments and if an immediate reuse of a Channel Name is required, this is the recommended solution.
    -Warren

    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  4. 41 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    2 comments  ·  Public » Guest Access  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Anonymous commented  · 

    I can't believe this has so few votes!

    Adding Guests to a Team is fine, but the ability to add a Guest to a Team and limit their access to only a specific Channel would be very helpful, that would reduce the need to multiple Teams just to allow Guest access when working in collaboration with a vendor. e.g. A Team is set-up for a specific technical project/programme, all internal contributors and project members have full access to the Team, the vendor needs access for certain elements so post those elements in a particular channel and give the vendor Guest access to the channel only. Sort of like a Private channel in reverse.

    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  5. 26 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    2 comments  ·  Public » Messaging  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base