Anonymous

My feedback

  1. 8 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Public » Wiki  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  2. 78 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    28 comments  ·  Public » Wiki  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Anonymous commented  · 

    I fully agree that the "Wiki" name should be dropped. The "Wiki" is a misnomer at best. However one might also call it a trip back to the dark ages of "embrace& extent".

    It is sad because I am having a hard time explaining to some Microsoft-only users that the problem is not that wikis are ****, but that MS's implementation is not a wiki. Also they don't "get" the importance of the missing features.

    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  3. 17 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Public » Wiki  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Anonymous commented  · 

    I fully agree. The "Wiki" is a misnomer at best. However one might also call it a trip back to the dark ages of "embrace& extent".

    It is sad because I am having a hard time explaining to some Microsoft-only users that the problem is not that wikis are ****, but that MS's implementation is not a wiki. Also they don't "get" the importance of the missing features.

    Anonymous supported this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base