John

My feedback

  1. 7 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    2 comments  ·  Teams for Government » Meetings  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    John commented  · 

    Yes, it would be nice to have the option out of the box, but I guess we will need to wait on it.

  2. 315 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    John commented  · 

    We have multiple customers requesting Forms & PowerApps integration.

    John supported this idea  · 
  3. 36 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    2 comments  ·  Teams for Government » Meetings  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    John commented  · 

    We have people complaining about this as well. Please give us the feature to remove drop-ins/guests to re-occurring meetings to make our customers happy.

    John supported this idea  · 
  4. 316 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    43 comments  ·  Teams for Government » Teams and Channels  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    John supported this idea  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    John commented  · 

    We could really use this feature too. For instance I have a Stream Team were we are getting the tool ready for Site use. I just got an email for up the chain to add two people for testing. I want to put the email request in the channel where we have our meetings. Instead I did a snip and notified the team of the request that way.

  5. 1,406 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    John supported this idea  · 
  6. 2,726 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    239 comments  ·  Schools and Universities » Calendar  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    John supported this idea  · 
  7. 939 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    189 comments  ·  Public » Teams and Channels  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    partially done  ·  Warren responded

    As mentioned in the prior status, the channel limit was raised from 100 to 200.

    In the near future a retention limit will be set so you can still go back and reinstate a channel you had deleted. Once the retention period has expired then the channel will get a hard delete which will free up the space and no longer count toward the 200 channel limit.

    This will help with some of the issues you have voiced in the comments below.
    But I understand many of you wish the limit to be further increased. I will continue to provide your votes and comments to the feature team.

    -Warren

    John supported this idea  · 
  8. 114 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    John supported this idea  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    John commented  · 

    I would allow [yourtenantname].sharepoint.com at least. Hopefully integration within a tenant to other GCC resources would be fully supported.

Feedback and Knowledge Base