sub-channels or sub-groups would be an awesome expansion of MS/Teams.
I am currently seeing "proliferation" of "MS/Teams" areas in my org, and then the increased use of "channels" within the teams. However, in our org, even the channel scope level is too broad, we would like to have a further level of refinement while maintaining a hierarchy so people can still readily find content.
I know the options of "folders" exists in a channel … However that does not allow the @blah communication.
I guess then this could be facilitated by "sub-channels" or the ability to create public "groups" for communication that could be @blah used.
Darrell
sub-channels or sub-groups would be an awesome expansion of MS/Teams.
I am currently seeing "proliferation" of "MS/Teams" areas in my org, and then the increased use of "channels" within the teams. However, in our org, even the channel scope level is too broad, we would like to have a further level of refinement while maintaining a hierarchy so people can still readily find content.
I know the options of "folders" exists in a channel … However that does not allow the @blah communication.
I guess then this could be facilitated by "sub-channels" or the ability to create public "groups" for communication that could be @blah used.