Darrell

My feedback

  1. 178 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    14 comments  ·  Public » Presence  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Darrell supported this idea  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Darrell commented  · 

    sub-channels or sub-groups would be an awesome expansion of MS/Teams.

    I am currently seeing "proliferation" of "MS/Teams" areas in my org, and then the increased use of "channels" within the teams. However, in our org, even the channel scope level is too broad, we would like to have a further level of refinement while maintaining a hierarchy so people can still readily find content.

    I know the options of "folders" exists in a channel … However that does not allow the @blah communication.

    I guess then this could be facilitated by "sub-channels" or the ability to create public "groups" for communication that could be @blah used.

Feedback and Knowledge Base