Liam

My feedback

  1. 290 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    35 comments  ·  Public » Interoperability  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Liam supported this idea  · 
  2. 96 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    4 comments  ·  Public » Messaging  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Liam supported this idea  · 
  3. 232 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    44 comments  ·  Public » Lists App  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Liam commented  · 

    Search is a primary navigation method for many users. It's absurd that it isn't part of the app from the outset.

    Liam supported this idea  · 
  4. 38,621 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    3951 comments  ·  Public » Messaging  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Thank you for your continued feedback. As many people have pointed out, this is available on mobile today. Support for replying to a specific message is on the backlog for desktop. I’ll let you know when we have progress to share. Thanks.

    Liam supported this idea  · 
  5. 836 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    173 comments  ·  Public » Teams and Channels  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    partially done  ·  Warren responded

    As mentioned in the prior status, the channel limit was raised from 100 to 200.

    In the near future a retention limit will be set so you can still go back and reinstate a channel you had deleted. Once the retention period has expired then the channel will get a hard delete which will free up the space and no longer count toward the 200 channel limit.

    This will help with some of the issues you have voiced in the comments below.
    But I understand many of you wish the limit to be further increased. I will continue to provide your votes and comments to the feature team.

    -Warren

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Liam commented  · 

    Many businesses will quickly go past the 200 project limit. While I can see that from a usability perspective, having a huge number of channels may make it harder to navigate, there should at least be the option to archive an unlimited number of channels. That way the number of active channels could be limited to 200 (preferably more) and archived channels (e.g. for defunct projects) could be made active only when there is new activity.

    Liam supported this idea  · 
  6. 3,039 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    373 comments  ·  Public » Files  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Liam supported this idea  · 
  7. 9,461 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1159 comments  ·  Public » Wiki  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Liam supported this idea  · 
  8. 14 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    2 comments  ·  Public » Files  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Liam supported this idea  · 
  9. 15 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    3 comments  ·  Public » Lists App  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Liam commented  · 

    Agreed - the SharePoint list should be fully functional, with the ability to launch flows on its items.

    Liam supported this idea  · 
  10. 17,641 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    953 comments  ·  Public » Teams and Channels  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Liam commented  · 

    It would make a lot of sense for our organisation to have one channel per project. Sadly, the limit on number of channels rules that out. If we were able to archive channels (assuming they were then not counted towards the channel) we'd be able to do that, instead of having to place all conversations on active projects in one channel.

    Liam supported this idea  · 
  11. 550 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    97 comments  ·  Public » Mobile  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Liam supported this idea  · 
  12. 42 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    5 comments  ·  Bug Reports » Files  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Liam commented  · 

    Same here, but with a folder. Once pinned via Teams, the folder shows as pinned in SharePoint, but the pin disappears from the Teams view upon reloading. Windows app, 1.3.00.4461 (64 bit).

    Liam supported this idea  · 
  13. 10,529 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    873 comments  ·  Public » Teams and Channels  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    if you have an existing post that you want to show in a different channel, you can edit the message and cross-post. This will add the top-level post to the different channel, but will not include the full set of replies. We will keep this request in mind as we evolve the cross-posting feature in the future and update if the status changes.

    Details on cross posting can be found here: https://support.office.com/article/cross-post-a-channel-conversation-in-teams-9c1252a3-67ef-498e-a7c1-dd7147b3d295.

    Liam supported this idea  · 
  14. 20,650 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1317 comments  ·  Public » Calendar  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Liam supported this idea  · 
  15. 5,869 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    436 comments  ·  Public » Teams and Channels  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Liam supported this idea  · 
  16. 30 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    2 comments  ·  Public » Teams and Channels  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Liam supported this idea  · 
  17. 25 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    17 comments  ·  Public » Interoperability  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Liam supported this idea  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Liam commented  · 

    Same here - .docx files work, .doc files (of which we have many) do not. It's not an option to convert our legacy files to .docx as other software requires them to be .doc. If collaboration features are not possible then the best behaviour would be to fall back to a read-only view of the .doc.

  18. 2,871 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    631 comments  ·  Public » Files  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Liam supported this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base