Anonymous

My feedback

  1. 108 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    2 comments  ·  Bug Reports » Client - Desktop  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  2. 370 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    93 comments  ·  Public » Mobile  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  3. 1 vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Public » Teams and Channels  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous shared this idea  · 
  4. 86 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    7 comments  ·  Public » Bots  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Anonymous commented  · 

    I think we need to separate at least two use cases here
    (1) embed polls interactively into meetings.
    (2) conduct pools with Teams channels

    To me, (2) is covered fairly well using Forms, but (1) is non-existent but should be worked on.

    Ideally, it would be available in Meetings and Live Events and support the following scenario: As an organizer/producer, I want to broadcast a question into a meeting, where participants can instantly response to the question from the meeting screen. After the question, I want to swithc over and broadcast a results page.

  5. 52 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    3 comments  ·  Public » People  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Anonymous commented  · 

    I agree, this is a highly desired feature. There is currently no evenly efficient way to search for the presence status of a particular user (in SfB, you could start typing the name of the colleague and immediately see the presence status, without the need to "select" the desired user.

  6. 195 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    38 comments  ·  Public » Mobile  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Anonymous commented  · 

    I can confirm that on my iPhone 7 with Teams App 2.0.10 (and developer preview enabled within the app) background blur is also not available. Any information appreciated.

  7. 170 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    21 comments  ·  Public » Meetings  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Anonymous commented  · 

    I have a related request. I want to be able to create (schedule) a meeting and send the Join-Link via a separate channel. This can make a lot of sense for example when you want to create a larger-scale meeting with largely "anonymous" participants from outside your organisation. In other words, I only want to share the URL link rather than send personalized invitation.
    To do this, today, I have to create the meeting with at least one participant first, save, then re-enter the calender, right-click on the link, copy the URL.
    Instead, I would like to see a procedure where I can copy the link instantly when creating the meeting

    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  8. 32 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    8 comments  ·  Public » Meetings  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Anonymous commented  · 

    I have a similar request. I want to be able to create (schedule) a meeting and send the Join-Link via a separate channel. This can make a lot of sense for example when you want to create a larger-scale meeting with largely "anonymous" participants from outside your organisation. In other words, I only want to share the URL link rather than send personalized invitation.
    To do this, today, I have to create the meeting with at least one participant first, save, then re-enter the calender, right-click on the link, copy the URL.
    Instead, I would like to see a procedure where I can copy the link instantly when creating the meeting.

  9. 242 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    29 comments  ·  Public » Teams and Channels  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Anonymous commented  · 

    Microsoft has officially recommended to use Chat (rather than creating a Team) for 1:1-meetings (for example regular meetings between a manager and an employee). In such 1:1 Meetings, having a planner to track Tasks makes a lot of sense. I don't see why Microsoft would not want to have Planners in a Chat.

    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  10. 162 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    18 comments  ·  Public » Planner  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  11. 760 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    104 comments  ·  Public » Planner  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Anonymous commented  · 

    Please add this feature.

    Additionally, the uploaded file should automatically be stored in the subfolder of the respective channel (not, as today with the Planner web interface), in the site's document root Folder.

    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  12. 257 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    60 comments  ·  Public » Files  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Anonymous commented  · 

    … I also would like to see this feature.

    However, in this case the uploaded file should automatically be stored in the Folder for the respective channel (not to the root of the site, as today when using the Planner web interface)

    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  13. 25 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Public » Messaging  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base