Anonymous

My feedback

  1. 35 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    5 comments  ·  Public » Mobile  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  2. 2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Public » UX/Design  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous shared this idea  · 
  3. 253 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    19 comments  ·  Public » Files  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  4. 6 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Public » Meetings  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Anonymous commented  · 

    I confirm the need for an option in meetings that the organizers can see all incoming video streams, whereas participants can only see video from organizer(s) and their screen shares - but participants should in this mode not be able to see each others' video streams. This would make a lot of sense e.g. in Webinar-style meetings, where you want to protect the privacy of the participants, while still allowing for more interaction (e.g., open mics for Q&A) than currently possible with Live Meetings.

    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  5. 5 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Public » Meetings  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous shared this idea  · 
  6. 234 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    31 comments  ·  Public » Meetings  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  7. 269 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    16 comments  ·  Bug Reports » Client - Desktop  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  8. 1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Public » Teams and Channels  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous shared this idea  · 
  9. 93 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    7 comments  ·  Public » Bots  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Anonymous commented  · 

    I think we need to separate at least two use cases here
    (1) embed polls interactively into meetings.
    (2) conduct pools with Teams channels

    To me, (2) is covered fairly well using Forms, but (1) is non-existent but should be worked on.

    Ideally, it would be available in Meetings and Live Events and support the following scenario: As an organizer/producer, I want to broadcast a question into a meeting, where participants can instantly response to the question from the meeting screen. After the question, I want to swithc over and broadcast a results page.

  10. 61 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    5 comments  ·  Public » People  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Anonymous commented  · 

    I agree, this is a highly desired feature. There is currently no evenly efficient way to search for the presence status of a particular user (in SfB, you could start typing the name of the colleague and immediately see the presence status, without the need to "select" the desired user.

  11. 296 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    40 comments  ·  Public » Meetings  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Anonymous commented  · 

    I have a related request. I want to be able to create (schedule) a meeting and send the Join-Link via a separate channel. This can make a lot of sense for example when you want to create a larger-scale meeting with largely "anonymous" participants from outside your organisation. In other words, I only want to share the URL link rather than send personalized invitation.
    To do this, today, I have to create the meeting with at least one participant first, save, then re-enter the calender, right-click on the link, copy the URL.
    Instead, I would like to see a procedure where I can copy the link instantly when creating the meeting

    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  12. 109 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    24 comments  ·  Public » Meetings  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Anonymous commented  · 

    I have a similar request. I want to be able to create (schedule) a meeting and send the Join-Link via a separate channel. This can make a lot of sense for example when you want to create a larger-scale meeting with largely "anonymous" participants from outside your organisation. In other words, I only want to share the URL link rather than send personalized invitation.
    To do this, today, I have to create the meeting with at least one participant first, save, then re-enter the calender, right-click on the link, copy the URL.
    Instead, I would like to see a procedure where I can copy the link instantly when creating the meeting.

  13. 356 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    41 comments  ·  Public » Teams and Channels  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Anonymous commented  · 

    Microsoft has officially recommended to use Chat (rather than creating a Team) for 1:1-meetings (for example regular meetings between a manager and an employee). In such 1:1 Meetings, having a planner to track Tasks makes a lot of sense. I don't see why Microsoft would not want to have Planners in a Chat.

    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  14. 274 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    29 comments  ·  Public » Planner  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  15. 837 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    110 comments  ·  Public » Planner  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Anonymous commented  · 

    Please add this feature.

    Additionally, the uploaded file should automatically be stored in the subfolder of the respective channel (not, as today with the Planner web interface), in the site's document root Folder.

    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  16. 263 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    60 comments  ·  Public » Files  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Anonymous commented  · 

    … I also would like to see this feature.

    However, in this case the uploaded file should automatically be stored in the Folder for the respective channel (not to the root of the site, as today when using the Planner web interface)

    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  17. 30 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    3 comments  ·  Public » Messaging  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base