iKnowTech

My feedback

  1. 1,256 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    265 comments  ·  Public » Calling  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    iKnowTech supported this idea  · 
  2. 1,345 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    201 comments  ·  Public » Messaging  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    iKnowTech supported this idea  · 
  3. 10 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Public » Teams and Channels  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    iKnowTech shared this idea  · 
  4. 14 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    6 comments  ·  Public » IT Pro  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    iKnowTech commented  · 

    Seems logical right, everything I want to do in Teams that should be basic functionality I have to vote for.

    iKnowTech supported this idea  · 
  5. 32 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    6 comments  ·  Public » IT Pro  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    iKnowTech supported this idea  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    iKnowTech commented  · 

    Honestly, every-time I come to the uservoice website, its for something that I can't believe doesn't already exist. What's the Point of having configuration profiles if you have no way to even viewing which profiles are assigned to which devices?

    I've also noticed that if make a change to a profile that change doesn't get pushed down to the device and trying to get devices to switch from one profile to another doesn't work, or if it does you can't tell which profile they are actually on after attempting to make a change.

    There is also no way to Remove a Configuration profile.

    I mean seriously, who worked on this UX, and thought job well done, this works well.

  6. 144 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    15 comments  ·  Public » Meetings  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    iKnowTech commented  · 

    This is absolutely needed, and I can't believe I need to come here and even request this. This seems like just a complete oversight or just a completely half backed product SKU What's the point of having an Audio Conference License attached to the "Teams Meeting Room" license, if there is no way for a user to even schedule the use of the Conference Bridge? This seems like it would be easily resolvable. If you schedule a Meeting where the Location is a Room that has a "Teams Meeting Room" license associated with it just have a check box in Outlook and Teams Meeting Room creation dialog that appears and says "Add Teams Meeting Room Audio Conference Details"

    I reached out to MSFT support on this, and there recommendation is to have an Admin figure out the Meeting Room's Conference Bridge Settings. Publish those details somewhere that your users can access, and then have them copy and paste the details into their Invites whenever they want to use the Conference Bridge. So if I have a business with 20 conference Rooms, I need to basically build create a internal webpage or something that lists all these details and expect users to remember where to access these details, and hope the copy and paste the correct Bridge info for the Correct Room. Just ridiculous, but it seems like a lot of the Teams stuff is putting the cart before the horse, and just release it and start selling licensing, then we'll go back later and figure out how to actually make this product work in a useful way. Extremely frustrating.

    iKnowTech supported this idea  · 
  7. 605 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    85 comments  ·  Public » Calling  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Thanks for your feedback. The transfer to voicemail option is currently in testing and will be released soon.

    Note: Direct calls to a users voicemail is a separate feature which is planned. We’ll update when we have more details to share on this one.

    Thanks.

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    iKnowTech commented  · 

    I can't believe I even have to vote for this request. The fact that isnt built into the product at release is basically nearing incompetence on MSFT's part. I'm also finding I can't have a simple general voicemail box without additional licensing which is again just mind boggling. Already regretting pushing clients towards this product.

    iKnowTech supported this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base