Edouard Paumier

My feedback

  1. 57 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    3 comments  ·  Public » Teams and Channels  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Edouard Paumier supported this idea  · 
  2. 10,163 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1178 comments  ·  Public » UX/Design  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Edouard Paumier commented  · 

    Frankly, I find many of those positions excessively strong in regard to the UI. After using it a while now, we find that the UI is okay-ish regarding density. Sure it could be perfected, but still, I can see 18 messages in a standard screen.

    When looking at the screenshots of the user voice, and reading sentencing like "I can't see more than 10 messages", I wonder if the problem is not that many users creates multiple conversations instead of a single one with multiple answers.

    If so, I feel part of the user votes could be solved by something much more straightforward such as https://microsoftteams.uservoice.com/forums/555103-public/suggestions/33705811-after-starting-a-new-conversation-i-would-like-the

    Just my opinion, don't shoot me :).

  3. 2,987 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    361 comments  ·  Public » Messaging  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Edouard Paumier commented  · 

    I think also this is one of the major root cause of dissatisfaction of users in regard to the user interface, though hidden under misunderstanding and confusion.

    Because users do not understand this concept of "conversation", they start creating multiple ones, and as a result
    - The display is extremely not compact. The result is a user voice with 7800+ votes on it (https://microsoftteams.uservoice.com/forums/555103-public/suggestions/17408641-compact-mode).
    - If one person of the team uses the reply feature on one of those conversation, the order is rearranged and conversations makes no sense. As a result I heard people saying "Stop using reply, it breaks the order of my messages".

    Because of this one simple missing feature, the whole concept is unknown to users and going down the drain.

    I would like to add a rationale on this :
    - The probability I want to add a second message related to the one I just send is really high.
    - The probability I want to start two parallel conversations just one after the other is extremely low.

    Therefore, after creating a conversation, focusing on the "reply" instead of staying on the "start conversation" makes much more sense.

    Edouard Paumier supported this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base



You are about to visit the UserVoice site for Microsoft Teams

We have partnered with UserVoice, a 3rd party service providing public discussion forums for product-specific feedback.

By clicking "Continue to UserVoice" you agree to UserVoice's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.