Anonymous

My feedback

  1. 1,709 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    242 comments  ·  Public » Meetings  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Anonymous commented  · 

    Seriously... how hard can this be!?

    I have a suggestion that would clear up most of your backlog. Buy Slack. You bought Skype, and it didn't pan out so well. Don't let that discourage you though! Slack is superior to Teams in almost every area. It is a safe purchase.

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Anonymous commented  · 

    This is closing in on a YEAR since you claimed to be working on this. Can't you just hire someone from RingCentral or Zoom or Slack or any of the other services that knows how to do this?

    If it has taken your engineers 8 months, and they still can't figure it out, they need outside help.

    This is the single biggest reason why I recommend that our clients use Zoom instead of Teams.

  2. 36,452 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    3102 comments  ·  Public » Account Access (Sign-In)  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    The engineering team is continuing to work on adding support for multiple accounts on desktop clients. We will first launch support for 1 work/school account and 1 personal account so users can enjoy Teams for work and personal side-by-side. Windows and MacOS. Support for multiple work accounts is still being worked on and will come at a later date.

    You can track status via the roadmap here: https://www.microsoft.com/microsoft-365/roadmap?searchterms=68845.

    Thanks!

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Anonymous commented  · 

    To those suggesting Franz, I disagree. That is *not* a solution to this problem. It is a very poor workaround.

    I shouldn't need to pay additional subscriptions for all of our users just to allow them to access multiple organizations. And I shouldn't need to subject them to the nagging of the free version.

    This should be an included feature of Teams. Otherwise, it really isn't ready for enterprise usage.

    I honestly can't believe this wasn't a required feature to be implemented prior to launch. Any consulting organization can't use Teams, as they have to choose whether they want to communicate with their internal consulting organization or with one of their clients.

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Anonymous commented  · 

    To me, this is a blocker to adopting teams. Until this is available, I have to stay with Slack. Slack allows me to be signed in to 3 organizations (or more) at the same time.

    As I work for multiple organizations which have Teams, I can't spend my day signing in and out just to see messages. Especially since I have to type in my username and password and go through MFA every time for every account.

    This is definitely a better overall app than Skype/Lync as far as from a reliability perspective. At least with Teams all of my messages are delivered every time (so far).

    However, without this feature, I can't rely on this as a primary communications tool.

    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  3. 52 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    2 comments  ·  Public » Teams and Channels  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base