Anonymous

My feedback

  1. 525 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    87 comments  ·  Public » Teams and Channels  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
    Anonymous commented  · 

    for channel we have the same Problem:

    https://microsoftteams.uservoice.com/forums/555103-public/suggestions/16939708-move-arrange-channels

    kind of the same Problem! plx vote here!

  2. 53 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    31 comments  ·  Public » Tabs  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    we have this!  ·  v-brorob responded

    Hi Sam,

    You can drag and drop the tabs to display in the order you would like them in.

    -Brooke

    Anonymous commented  · 

    but not the Channels it self.

    https://microsoftteams.uservoice.com/forums/555103-public/suggestions/16939708-move-arrange-channels

    kind of the same Problem! plx vote here!

  3. 213 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    15 comments  ·  Public » Teams and Channels  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
    Anonymous commented  · 
  4. 11,392 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1314 comments  ·  Public » Teams and Channels  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous commented  · 

    @Baris A.
    interesting! any tips you can share? to maybe avoid some of the "nightmares"?

    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  5. 450 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    114 comments  ·  Public » Teams and Channels  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    partially done  ·  Warren responded

    As mentioned in the prior status, the channel limit was raised from 100 to 200.

    In the near future a retention limit will be set so you can still go back and reinstate a channel you had deleted. Once the retention period has expired then the channel will get a hard delete which will free up the space and no longer count toward the 200 channel limit.

    This will help with some of the issues you have voiced in the comments below.
    But I understand many of you wish the limit to be further increased. I will continue to provide your votes and comments to the feature team.

    -Warren

    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  6. 6 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Public » Meetings  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  7. 2 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Public » IP Phones  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  8. 2 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Public » Government  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  9. 2 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Public » Planner  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  10. 4 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Public » UX/Design  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  11. 17 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    3 comments  ·  Public » Interoperability  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  12. 4 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    3 comments  ·  Public » Meetings  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous commented  · 

    good idear !

    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  13. 25 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    3 comments  ·  Public » Room Systems  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  14. 3 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Public » Interoperability  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  15. 5 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Public » Guest Access  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  16. 6 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Public » Calling  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  17. 5,157 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    915 comments  ·  Public » Messaging  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  18. 12,164 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1252 comments  ·  Public » UX/Design  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    As we announced at Microsoft Ignite 2019 this morning, we are excited to confirm that Multi-window capabilities are coming to Microsoft Teams, and will start rolling out to the public ring early next year!

    Thanks,
    Alex & the Teams team

    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  19. 2,969 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    535 comments  ·  Public » Messaging  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous commented  · 

    No consumer Skype federation is a show stopper as well!
    same here!

    Will it need another 2,5 years?...

    Anonymous commented  · 

    What a shame!!

    Anonymous commented  · 

    Why is there a setting in the Teams admin centre which says "Users can communicate with Skype users" (in addition to the SfB setting) if this is currently not possible? :/

    YES! this sucks!?

    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  20. 91 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    10 comments  ·  Public » Files  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
← Previous 1 3 4 5 18 19

Feedback and Knowledge Base