Stephan G
My feedback
-
88 votes
Stephan G supported this idea ·
-
39,959 votes
Thank you for your continued feedback. As many people have pointed out, this is available on mobile today. Support for replying to a specific message is on the backlog for desktop. I’ll let you know when we have progress to share. Thanks.
Stephan G supported this idea ·
-
1,054 votes
Thanks for providing feedback on this issue. The work is officially on the backlog now. We’ll update when we have more details to share.
Stephan G supported this idea ·
-
13,721 votes
We have raised the priority of this work item, and it is currently being worked on. We don’t have any dates to share at this point, but will update when we have new status. Thank you!
Stephan G supported this idea ·
-
1,157 votes
Stephan G supported this idea ·
-
1,927 votes
This feature request is still working its way through the backlog queue.
-Warren
Stephan G supported this idea ·
An error occurred while saving the comment -
886 votes
Stephan G supported this idea ·
-
20,810 votes
Group Calendar is a priority for the team, and the feature team is continuing work on it. You’ll start to see some incremental improvements. We look forward to sharing more details and timeframes soon.
Thanks!
Stephan G supported this idea ·
-
17,876 votes
This item remains on the backlog.
Stephan G supported this idea ·
-
180 votes
Stephan G supported this idea ·
-
10,628 votes
if you have an existing post that you want to show in a different channel, you can edit the message and cross-post. This will add the top-level post to the different channel, but will not include the full set of replies. We will keep this request in mind as we evolve the cross-posting feature in the future and update if the status changes.
Details on cross posting can be found here: https://support.office.com/article/cross-post-a-channel-conversation-in-teams-9c1252a3-67ef-498e-a7c1-dd7147b3d295.
Stephan G supported this idea ·
Most important feature if you want IT guys to like the cloud ;)
We can script all features - but this is a must feature - is it that compute intensive or what is the problem about nested groups?