Anonymous

My feedback

  1. 486 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    69 comments  ·  Public » Meetings  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  2. 543 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    58 comments  ·  Public » Meetings  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    We are currently rolling out the increase for the Teams meeting limit. The new permanent meeting limit is 300 participants (in the meeting call and the chat). We expect this to be enabled by the end of June for the public cloud, with government clouds to follow.

    For additional info on Meetings limits in Teams, visit: https://docs.microsoft.com/microsoftteams/limits-specifications-teams#meetings-and-calls

    For insight into the Roadmap, please visit: https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-365/roadmap?filters=&searchterms=64225

    Thanks.

    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  3. 2,694 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    387 comments  ·  Public » People  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Anonymous commented  · 

    +1

    Similar to comments below, am working with a large enterprise customer where this is becoming a huge feature request that can not be dodged. This functionality is critical to connect corporate and front line workers where there is high turnover and users need to quickly find users (ideally who are active) based on logically centralized groups.

    For a front line worker centric industry (retail, hospitality etc..), picture a scenario where someone at head office needs to reach out to a manager-role halfway across the world at a particular location to quickly see if someone from a particular functional area is available and can briefly discuss an item via chat. Should they join the local store's manager team to browse it's membership? No, would be a lot easier if they could quickly browse the distribution / AD structure that's been instituted for years from the Chat section, browse / pin that distribution group and reach out to an available user.. exactly how they would have done it for years in skype for business, IBM sametime or a number of other enterprise chat applications.

    The suggested workarounds to add users to teams is not practical as users who were not historically intended to be a member of a distribution list would need to join it just to browse the membership.. and by joining the membership they start polluting the accuracy of that team...
    I simply do NOT understand why this functionality was not ported over from Skype to support some quick user identification / chat.

    Hope this rationale is helpful for understanding the need

    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  4. 19,845 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    2044 comments  ·  Public » Messaging  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  5. 678 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    92 comments  ·  Public » IT Pro  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  6. 47,693 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    4963 comments  ·  Public » Messaging  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  7. 257 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    54 comments  ·  Public » Interoperability  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    needs your feedback  ·  Suphatra responded

    Hi everyone, I wanted to check in on this ask because it’s died down since GA, and also because the ask is not totally clear to me.

    Right now, we provide a way during the team creation process for you to select an existing Office 365 group. Are you asking to be able to do this same thing, but outside of Teams?

    Do let me know!

    Sincerely,
    Suphatra

    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  8. 21 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Public » Apps, Connectors, Messaging Extensions  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  9. 35,387 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    2985 comments  ·  Public » Account Access (Sign-In)  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    The engineering team is continuing to work on adding support for multiple accounts on desktop clients. We will first launch support for 1 work/school account and 1 personal account so users can enjoy Teams for work and personal side-by-side. Windows and MacOS. Support for multiple work accounts is still being worked on and will come at a later date.

    You can track status via the roadmap here: https://www.microsoft.com/microsoft-365/roadmap?searchterms=68845.

    Thanks!

    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  10. 2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Public » Bots  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  11. 3 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Public » Bots  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  12. 6 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Public » Bots  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  13. 7 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Public » Bots  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base