J Tenneson
My feedback
-
318 votesJ Tenneson
supported this idea
·
-
4,917 votes
Channel only member guests remains on the backlog.
An error occurred while saving the comment J Tenneson
supported this idea
·
-
159 votesJ Tenneson
supported this idea
·
-
92 votesJ Tenneson
supported this idea
·
-
5 votesJ Tenneson
supported this idea
·
-
128 votesJ Tenneson
supported this idea
·
-
189 votesJ Tenneson
shared this idea
·
-
17 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment J Tenneson
commented
Use Case: Our development team has an internal team for discussion and collaboration. There is a separate corporate UGX team I'd like to pin to the top of our "Standards" channel for easy reference by our team members.
J Tenneson
supported this idea
·
-
25 votesJ Tenneson
supported this idea
·
-
24 votesJ Tenneson
supported this idea
·
-
3 votesJ Tenneson
supported this idea
·
-
62 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment J Tenneson
commented
Agree on all points.
1. Skype allows both participants and chat to be visible and I find this very useful during meetings. I would like to see Teams enhanced similarly.
2. Likely a different request, but the ability to undock would also be valuable. I use 3 monitors at my desk and being able to have the meeting full-screen on my main with the chat panel and participants list open in seperate pop-outs in a second monitor would be very valuable. Especially as the number of participants grows (e.g. an org group meeting, or a cross-channel update).J Tenneson
supported this idea
·
-
40 votesJ Tenneson
supported this idea
·
-
1,453 votes
Still under review by the feature team. Nothing new to report at this time.
-Warren
An error occurred while saving the comment J Tenneson
commented
Definitely worth more than just a vote. The ability to create your own categories and place teams inside those categories (e.g. Corporate Teams, Dev Teams, Ad-Hoc Projects, Process Teams, etc) would be incredibly useful.
I love the fact our organization is moving more and more to teams rather than each group having it's own random location of updates, but I'm afraid that we will start losing engagement as trying to organize the information provided becomes overwhelming and decreases engagement.
J Tenneson
supported this idea
·
-
34 votesJ Tenneson
supported this idea
·
-
148 votesJ Tenneson
supported this idea
·
-
14 votesJ Tenneson
supported this idea
·
-
7 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment J Tenneson
commented
Upvoted.
We have an existing SharePoint structure that was migrated into our new O365 SharePoint.
In this structure there are many cases where we would like the option, at the time of team creation, to choose which existing subfolders become channels of their own, and which subfolders remain in the General >> Files section.
That would be the MVP at least. Getting crazy post-MVP:
a) Being able to assign more than 1 folder to 1 new channel (many to one)
b) Being able to migrate folders from other SharePoints into the new Teams-linked SharePoint (#consolidateFTW!)J Tenneson
supported this idea
·
-
51 votesJ Tenneson
supported this idea
·
-
216 votesJ Tenneson
supported this idea
·
Please help us help Sales. And not let them see the sausage being made.
Having one spot where Product and Development can communicate and make all the sausage and then having a channel where we can add Sales staff to only that channel in order to facilitate sales being able to ask questions and make inquires that are highly visible but with all the sausage hidden from them is very valuable.
We are currently creating entirely new teams to house 1 channel to communicate with Sales.
This is inefficient as it as while it's easy to create teams, it becomes harder to efficiently track as the number of teams increase, and if you have to engage with multiple groups within your org, the number of teams can expand fairly rapidly.
And there's almost 3,000 votes.
Being able to turn on member management for a specific channel is clearly highly desired.