Christoph

My feedback

  1. 9 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Public » UX/Design  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Christoph commented  · 
  2. 117 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    15 comments  ·  Public » UX/Design  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Christoph commented  · 

    Yes, making the subject line visible would also help users distinguish between replying to an existing conversation and starting a new conversation.

    And making it possible to require a subject line (at least in certain channels) would basically make it impossible for users to mistakenly start a new conversation.

    Christoph supported this idea  · 
  3. 44 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Christoph supported this idea  · 
  4. 147 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    35 comments  ·  Public » Calling  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    declined  ·  Warren responded

    Hate to share bad news, but this request was declined by the feature team.

    -Warren

    Christoph supported this idea  · 
  5. 970 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    104 comments  ·  Public » Messaging  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    planned  ·  Suphatra responded

    We are planning for this! I’m trying to get a date when work will start. But it is officially off the backlog. :-)

    Suphatra

    Christoph commented  · 

    Any news on this? It's been "planned" for almost a year now...

    I would like to emphasize the importance of quoting parts of messages so as to show exactly what you are replying to. Is this what you are planning? (quotemaster unfortunately only quotes the entire message)

    Christoph commented  · 

    > Simply copy the line of text that you wish to quote and use “Shift” + “>” (greater than symbol) to insert someone’s comments as a quote.

    Thanks for pointing that out, Warren, but I'm not sure if this is specific to US keyboards or if I'm missing something else because for me, “Shift” + “>” produces the greater than symbol (and formats the current line as a quote) but it does not insert the content of the clipboard (why should it anyway?). So your workaround works, but it is quite a bit more laborious than you seem to suggest. Also, from that quote, there is, of course, no way of telling who the original author was or which post the quote comes from. (I hope this will be included in the actual feature once it's released).

    Anyway, thanks for pointing out the workaround!

    Christoph supported this idea  · 
  6. 9,911 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1016 comments  ·  Public » UX/Design  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Christoph supported this idea  · 
  7. 23,956 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1950 comments  ·  Public » Teams and Channels  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    We acknowledge the customer demand for Private Channels and have been hard at work on it. Private Channels is currently in preview with a select group of customers. We expect to release the feature to the public later this Fall, and will update here when we are starting to roll out to all customers. We appreciate all the feedback you have provided to us on this forum and thank you for your patience.

    ~Alex

    Christoph commented  · 

    So, just to clarify: private channels, as they are being implemented in the coming weeks are limited to members of the parent team, right?

  8. 387 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    40 comments  ·  Public » Teams and Channels  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    on the backlog  ·  Warren responded

    This feature request is still on the backlog. I’m waiting to hear more that I can share.
    -Warren

    Christoph commented  · 

    @Warren One year later, this is still on the backlog, I suppose, but could you post a quick update on whether there are any new developments? Even negative news are better than no news...

    Christoph supported this idea  · 
  9. 3,299 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    389 comments  ·  Public » Messaging  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Christoph commented  · 

    It's great to see that things are happening and I appreciate that you are asking users for feedback. I was a bit surprised, though, when I saw the three options to are considering in the survey. Given those alternatives, I dare say that the result is quite predictable: most people will obviously prefer "New conversation". ("New chat" will be the second option, but most will probably reject it as too informal and/or potentially confusing as the term is already used elsewhere in Teams. And "New Post", frankly, should not have been in the survey in the first place because it contradicts the very purpose of distinguishing replies from new conversations, which is what this "feature request" is about.)

    So I'm left wondering what the purpose of this survey is, after all. There are other terms that could meaningfully have competed with "New Conversation", such as "New Topic", or "New Thread". The fact that it they were omitted suggest that someone at Microsoft is fighting trying to explain to their colleagues that "New Conversation" is the best option and needs some backing for that from the users. Fair enough. I also think that is the best option, but it's sad to see that some people at microsoft don't see this as already evident from what has been said here over the past 1.5 years.

    Christoph supported this idea  · 
  10. 122 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    12 comments  ·  Public » Teams and Channels  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Christoph supported this idea  · 
  11. 3 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Bug Reports » Client - Desktop  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Christoph commented  · 
  12. 310 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    30 comments  ·  Schools and Universities  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    working on it  ·  Warren responded

    The feature to support private channels is actively being worked upon!

    -Warren

    Christoph supported this idea  · 
  13. 423 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    70 comments  ·  Public » Teams and Channels  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    working on it  ·  Warren responded

    Unfortunately we hit some snags and this has moved back to “working on it”. The team is working to make some corrections and I hope to have a release date in the near future. I’ll keep you posted with what I hear.
    -Warren

    Christoph commented  · 

    Just to be clear: what exactly is being worked on here? Is it what was originally requested in the OP or what Suphatra described in her post, i.e. the invite link workaround?

    Christoph supported this idea  · 
  14. 20 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    2 comments  ·  Public » Teams and Channels  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Christoph supported this idea  · 
  15. 28 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Public » Search  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Christoph supported this idea  · 
  16. 388 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    98 comments  ·  Public » Teams and Channels  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    partially done  ·  Warren responded

    As mentioned in the prior status, the channel limit was raised from 100 to 200.

    In the near future a retention limit will be set so you can still go back and reinstate a channel you had deleted. Once the retention period has expired then the channel will get a hard delete which will free up the space and no longer count toward the 200 channel limit.

    This will help with some of the issues you have voiced in the comments below.
    But I understand many of you wish the limit to be further increased. I will continue to provide your votes and comments to the feature team.

    -Warren

    Christoph supported this idea  · 
  17. 961 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    152 comments  ·  Public » Notifications  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    under review  ·  Warren responded

    This item is still being reviewed and pending a decision. No new details at this time.

    -Warren

    Christoph commented  · 

    I’m not sure if auto-follow is the better for all channels (people may get annoyedabout having to repeatedly unfollow new niche channels) it would be great to let channel creators decide whether this should be an opt-in or an opt-out channel.

    Christoph supported this idea  · 
  18. 356 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    declined  ·  25 comments  ·  Public » People  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Christoph commented  · 

    So this has just been declined. Why? My hope is that this request is seen as redunant and that what is requested will nevertheless be imlemented. In that case: which issue should we turn to?

    If the request is outrightly rejected, I’d like to understand why.

    Christoph supported this idea  · 
  19. 385 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    87 comments  ·  Public » Mobile  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Christoph supported this idea  · 
  20. 9,762 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1131 comments  ·  Public » Teams and Channels  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Christoph commented  · 

    Is the survey already closed or is it broken? When I click the link, it says "Sorry, this survey is not currently active."

    Christoph supported this idea  · 
← Previous 1

Feedback and Knowledge Base



You are about to visit the UserVoice site for Microsoft Teams

We have partnered with UserVoice, a 3rd party service providing public discussion forums for product-specific feedback.

By clicking "Continue to UserVoice" you agree to UserVoice's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.