Lisa R

My feedback

  1. 98 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    9 comments  ·  Public » Shifts  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Lisa R supported this idea  · 
  2. 206 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    19 comments  ·  Public » Shifts  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Lisa R supported this idea  · 
  3. 3 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Public » Bugs  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Lisa R supported this idea  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Lisa R commented  · 

    I have experienced this problem as well. It appears that *owners* can only delete connectors when the Team is configured to allow *members* to create/modify/remove connectors. As a work-around, I can configure my Teams space to allow members to modify connectors, remove the connector, then restore my desired permission configuration. This is not ideal, and I would like Team owners to be able to delete connectors without modifying Team member permissions.

  4. 63 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    14 comments  ·  Public » Meetings  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Lisa R commented  · 

    I agree as well - this is a terrible implementation. I have had people mis-click the "next slide" button when perusing my slide deck & inadvertently take control. Yes, I can take control BACK, but the meeting has been disrupted in the process.

    The cleanest approach would be to restrict those who *can* take control, then I do not need to interrupt my presentation to *grant* control to the one or two other people who need to control the presentation. But using 'request' instead of 'take' would be an improvement.

    Lisa R supported this idea  · 
  5. 19 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Lisa R shared this idea  · 
  6. 253 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    46 comments  ·  Public » Developer Platform  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Lisa R supported this idea  · 
  7. 16 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    6 comments  ·  Public » Bots  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Lisa R commented  · 

    Me too; very disappointing

    Lisa R supported this idea  · 
  8. 6 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Public » IT Pro  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Lisa R supported this idea  · 
  9. 935 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    258 comments  ·  Public » People  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    The option to “discard” suggested contacts in your chat list is rolling out to users. We will be making further changes to make suggested contacts more relevant for new users in the future as well, so marking as partially completed. Thanks for your patience with this one.

    ~Alex & the Teams team

    Lisa R supported this idea  · 
  10. 3,353 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    579 comments  ·  Public » Notifications  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Lisa R commented  · 

    In Windows, Skype appeared as an application in the sounds control panel, and different events like call ended, incoming call, and incoming IM all could be configured with different WAVs. I would like the Teams client to do something similar.

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Lisa R commented  · 

    In Windows, Skype appeared as an application in the sounds control panel, and different events like call ended, incoming call, and incoming IM all could be configured with different WAVs. I would like the Teams client to do something similar.

    Lisa R supported this idea  · 
  11. 3 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Public » UX/Design  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Lisa R shared this idea  · 
  12. 14,394 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    813 comments  ·  Public » Teams and Channels  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Lisa R commented  · 

    From a prioritization standpoint, I would put "Move channels into other teams" ahead of "Ability to archive channels" because moving channels between teams would provide a work-around to *not* being able to archive channels. I could have an archived Teams space, reactivate it, move a channel into it, then archive the Teams space again. Not as nice/clean as just archiving the channel, but it would get the job done.

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Lisa R commented  · 

    I'm disappointed to see this moved into the backlog -- it is inconvenient to create a new team for the same people every time we've got a new project. Six months in, the long list of inactive project channels is an annoyance -- I've been renaming channels for completed projects to start with something like "zzArchive" so they get sorted to the bottom of the list -- but the it's getting progressively worse as we continue to use Teams.

    Lisa R supported this idea  · 
  13. 20,853 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    2474 comments  ·  Public » Teams and Channels  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Lisa R commented  · 

    From a prioritization standpoint, I would put "Move channels into other teams" ahead of "Ability to archive channels" because moving channels between teams would provide a work-around to *not* being able to archive channels. I could have an archived Teams space, reactivate it, move a channel into it, then archive the Teams space again. Not as nice/clean as just archiving the channel, but it would get the job done.

    Lisa R supported this idea  · 
  14. 572 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    103 comments  ·  Public » Teams and Channels  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Lisa R commented  · 

    Another vote for mouse-over -- what's the point of displaying the team/channel name when I mouse over the thing? It was already *right there*. Unfortunately, the fact that the team description is only visible in the carousel & channel description only when someone edits the channel (and that's SO not something I want to encourage random users to do) probably means our teams/channels won't *have* descriptions.

    Lisa R supported this idea  · 
  15. 6,777 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    608 comments  ·  Public » Messaging  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Lisa R commented  · 

    I would suggest this be a point of control for owners too -- owners can pin v/s everyone can pin.

    Lisa R supported this idea  · 
  16. 491 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    43 comments  ·  Public » Teams and Channels  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    under review  ·  Warren responded

    This feature request is still be reviewed by the feature team. No additional details are available at this time.

    -Warren

    Lisa R supported this idea  · 
  17. 88 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    17 comments  ·  Public » Interoperability  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Lisa R supported this idea  · 
  18. 15 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    3 comments  ·  Public » Presence  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Lisa R supported this idea  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Lisa R commented  · 

    I would also like to be able to search by department and phone number.

  19. 33 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Public » Shifts  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Lisa R shared this idea  · 
  20. 5 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    2 comments  ·  Public » UX/Design  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Lisa R supported this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base