Lisa R

My feedback

  1. 16 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Public » Developer Platform  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Lisa R commented  · 

    The Graph API, in its current iteration, is essentially unusable at an enterprise level. Access is granted to read/write to *ALL* Teams spaces which is a LOT of power to give an application. Either have the Graph API include specific Teams IDs which it can access or have each Team include configuration to allow specific registered app IDs to access their data. In the later case, an admin would still approve the app access in the tenant but the Team owner would need to add the app ID to the Team before any data could be read.

    Lisa R supported this idea  · 
  2. 73 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    8 comments  ·  Public » Teams and Channels  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Lisa R commented  · 

    I would prefer private teams *not* be searchable as a default, but allow Team owners to opt into the Team being searchable. A warning could be included to remind to check that the team name does not leak confidential information.

    Lisa R supported this idea  · 
  3. 13,239 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1124 comments  ·  Public » Performance  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Great performance and user experience remain a topmost priority for us. Application launch time has seen improvements in the recent build. We will continue making improvements across the product including channel to chat switching and overall resource consumption.

    Lisa R supported this idea  · 
  4. 35 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    4 comments  ·  Public » Calendar  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Lisa R commented  · 

    Even if Team members have Exchange accounts, invitations are not generated unless the individual is added as a specific participant. I know people found the previous approach (everyone in the Team got invited & had a meeting on their calendar) confusing. But I find the approach where channel meetings don't show up in my calendar confusing *and* I miss meetings. Having some sort of notification about channel meetings would give some indication that a meeting is occurring, although I would *far* prefer the meetings just show up on my calendar.

    Lisa R supported this idea  · 
  5. 563 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    99 comments  ·  Public » VDI Platfom  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    planned  ·  Warren responded

    Good news, this feature has moved into the planning stages. I’ll keep you posted as we continue to move ahead in development.

    -Warren

    Lisa R supported this idea  · 
  6. 748 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    130 comments  ·  Public » Messaging  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    partially done  ·  Warren responded

    Item 1 and 2 are Under Review.

    Item 3 has been Completed.

    I’ll keep you posted as I hear more on this request.

    -Warren

    Lisa R supported this idea  · 
  7. 19 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Public » Teams and Channels  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Lisa R supported this idea  · 
  8. 11 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Public » UX/Design  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Lisa R shared this idea  · 
  9. 4,086 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    480 comments  ·  Public » Teams and Channels  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Lisa R supported this idea  · 
  10. 1,262 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    187 comments  ·  Public » Developer Platform  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Lisa R supported this idea  · 
  11. 272 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    18 comments  ·  Public » Notifications  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Lisa R supported this idea  · 
  12. 19 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Public » IT Pro  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Lisa R supported this idea  · 
  13. 7 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Public » UX/Design  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Lisa R supported this idea  · 
  14. 21 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    3 comments  ·  Public » Shifts  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Lisa R commented  · 

    This is a fundamental flaw in Shifts -- and I'd like new adds to the Team to pop into the Shifts plan as well. For a small group, having to add the six people in the group into the Shift plan may not seem inconvenient, but individually adding my thirty members was a HUGE waste of time. For Shifts managers, their first experience with Shifts is frustrating and time wasting -- not exactly the initial impression you want with an application.

    If a significant number of organizations *don't* want the Shifts plan auto-populated from Team members, provide a Boolean "Keep Shifts membership in sync with Team membership" type of configuration parameter. Even a UI component to multi-select from current Team members would be an improvement.

    Lisa R supported this idea  · 
  15. 1,268 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    under review  ·  Warren responded

    The team is still reviewing this item. I hope to know of a decision soon.

    -Warren

    Lisa R supported this idea  · 
  16. 579 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    35 comments  ·  Public » Shifts  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Lisa R supported this idea  · 
  17. 71 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    3 comments  ·  Public » Shifts  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Lisa R supported this idea  · 
  18. 591 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    planned  ·  63 comments  ·  Public » Shifts  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Lisa R supported this idea  · 
  19. 9 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Public » Shifts  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Lisa R supported this idea  · 
  20. 949 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    136 comments  ·  Public » Shifts  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Thank you for your feedback! We are hard at work improving the Shifts app experience including adding recurring shifts. In the meantime, we wanted to share some tips and tricks to help with some pain-points mentioned:
    1) Make Edits to Your Schedule (Delete, Undo, Minor Copy Edits): Shifts works similarly to Excel in certain regards, so make sure to highlight shifts with your mouse and utilize keyboard shortcuts (Ctrl+C, Ctrl+V, Ctrl+Z) to copy, delete, or undo actions. We find it helpful doing this particularly in month view and week view.
    2) Copy Button: Use the copy button on the top right to copy any timeframe you need for the entire schedule.
    3) Search for Shifts in Creation Phase: When creating a shift, utilize the search command to find shifts that have already been created in the past.

    We’ll keep you posted when we have more news!

    Lisa R supported this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base