Lisa R

My feedback

  1. 7 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Public » Teams and Channels  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Lisa R supported this idea  · 
  2. 33 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    4 comments  ·  Public » IT Pro - Controls and Knobs  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Lisa R supported this idea  · 
  3. 2 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Public » UX/Design  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Lisa R shared this idea  · 
  4. 21 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Public » Bots  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Lisa R supported this idea  · 
  5. 1,734 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    333 comments  ·  Public » Calling  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Lisa R supported this idea  · 
  6. 775 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    144 comments  ·  Public » Messaging  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Lisa R supported this idea  · 
  7. 2,139 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    331 comments  ·  Public » Messaging  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    under review  ·  Warren responded

    This item is still under review. No new updates at this time.
    -Warren

    Lisa R commented  · 

    While the logic that the chat is persistent thus always available might seem to negate this need, the introduction of retention policies has made this function more critical. Both Team and private chat conversations need to be exportable -- preferably into a format that preserves the formatting, but plain text would be better than "you lose it after the retention policy deletes it" or the current method of copy/pasting individual posts within a conversation.

    Lisa R supported this idea  · 
  8. 2 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Public » Bots  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Lisa R supported this idea  · 
  9. 81 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    14 comments  ·  Public » Desktop  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Lisa R supported this idea  · 
  10. 526 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    82 comments  ·  Public » Messaging  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Lisa R supported this idea  · 
  11. 5 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Public » Notifications  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Lisa R supported this idea  · 
  12. 32 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    2 comments  ·  Public » Interoperability  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Lisa R supported this idea  · 
  13. 87 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Thank you for your feedback. Many customers have asked for reporting capabilities around Praise, so this will be one of our top items in the list of things we want to add to Praise in the future.

    Lisa R supported this idea  · 
  14. 67 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Lisa R supported this idea  · 
  15. 16 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Public » Developer Platform  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Lisa R commented  · 

    The Graph API, in its current iteration, is essentially unusable at an enterprise level. Access is granted to read/write to *ALL* Teams spaces which is a LOT of power to give an application. Either have the Graph API include specific Teams IDs which it can access or have each Team include configuration to allow specific registered app IDs to access their data. In the later case, an admin would still approve the app access in the tenant but the Team owner would need to add the app ID to the Team before any data could be read.

    Lisa R supported this idea  · 
  16. 62 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    6 comments  ·  Public » Teams and Channels  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Lisa R commented  · 

    I would prefer private teams *not* be searchable as a default, but allow Team owners to opt into the Team being searchable. A warning could be included to remind to check that the team name does not leak confidential information.

    Lisa R supported this idea  · 
  17. 7,541 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    624 comments  ·  Public » Performance  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Performance has been and continues to be a big focus area for Teams. One main area we have made improvements in is responsiveness for the most frequent user actions of switching between Chat, Channel, and Activity. We are also focused on reducing resource consumption and application load time. More improvements are on the way.

    ~Alex

    Lisa R supported this idea  · 
  18. 10 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    2 comments  ·  Public » Calendar  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Lisa R commented  · 

    Even if Team members have Exchange accounts, invitations are not generated unless the individual is added as a specific participant. I know people found the previous approach (everyone in the Team got invited & had a meeting on their calendar) confusing. But I find the approach where channel meetings don't show up in my calendar confusing *and* I miss meetings. Having some sort of notification about channel meetings would give some indication that a meeting is occurring, although I would *far* prefer the meetings just show up on my calendar.

    Lisa R supported this idea  · 
  19. 482 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    83 comments  ·  Public » Meetings  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    planned  ·  Warren responded

    Good news, this feature has moved into the planning stages. I’ll keep you posted as we continue to move ahead in development.

    -Warren

    Lisa R supported this idea  · 
  20. 565 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    96 comments  ·  Public » Messaging  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    partially done  ·  Warren responded

    Item 1 and 2 are Under Review.

    Item 3 has been Completed.

    I’ll keep you posted as I hear more on this request.

    -Warren

    Lisa R supported this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base