Lisa R

My feedback

  1. 1 vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Public » Meetings  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Lisa R shared this idea  · 
  2. 93 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    7 comments  ·  Public » Meetings  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Lisa R supported this idea  · 
  3. 5,090 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    690 comments  ·  Public » Teams and Channels  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Lisa R supported this idea  · 
  4. 2,144 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    433 comments  ·  Public » Teams and Channels  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Lisa R commented  · 

    I currently use a PowerShell script because it's the only way to take a list of logon IDs or source a list of users out of a group. Those are the two methods we'd want to be able to use when bulk-populating a group -- (1) basically the same approach you can use when adding members to a group in Active Directory Users & Computers -- some delimited list of logon IDs, display names, etc which get resolved & then added to the Team and (2) the ability to select a group and add all members (recursive isn't a need for my company, but that may not be generally true) to the Team

  5. 2 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Public » Notifications  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Lisa R supported this idea  · 
  6. 59 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    8 comments  ·  Public » UX/Design  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Lisa R supported this idea  · 
  7. 602 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    59 comments  ·  Public » Teams and Channels  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Thank you for your continued feedback. The feature team is currently reviewing this ask and investigating how best to accomplish this. Please continue to provide your comments and votes. We will post an update as soon as one is available.

    Lisa R supported this idea  · 
  8. 49 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    2 comments  ·  Public » Teams and Channels  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Lisa R supported this idea  · 
  9. 3,992 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    613 comments  ·  Public » Teams and Channels  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Lisa R supported this idea  · 
  10. 17 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    2 comments  ·  Public » IT Pro  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Lisa R commented  · 

    Having an owner-configurable per-channel setting to post messages and replies immediately or require moderator approval prior to posting content would be useful in an enterprise environment as well. While some Teams/channels are appropriate for quick communication, informal speech, or random "water cooler" chat, others Teams/channels are forums for more formal discussion where format (subjects are included, cute-but-distracting animations are not used, etc) and content control is desirable.

    Lisa R supported this idea  · 
  11. 61 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    3 comments  ·  Public » Messaging  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Lisa R supported this idea  · 
  12. 22 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    2 comments  ·  Public » UX/Design  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Lisa R supported this idea  · 
  13. 32 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    2 comments  ·  Public » Meetings  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Lisa R supported this idea  · 
  14. 166 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    35 comments  ·  Public » Languages/Translation  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Lisa R supported this idea  · 
  15. 47 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Lisa R supported this idea  · 
  16. 50 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Public » Shifts  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Lisa R commented  · 

    I would like to see the "Notification" settings expanded to include Shifts, providing each user the ability to customize how they are notified of shift assignments, availability, bid requests, and swaps.

    Lisa R supported this idea  · 
  17. 285 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    39 comments  ·  Public » Interoperability  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Lisa R supported this idea  · 
  18. 132 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    12 comments  ·  Public » Teams and Channels  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Lisa R supported this idea  · 
  19. 56 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    9 comments  ·  Public » Tabs  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Lisa R supported this idea  · 
  20. 6 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Public » Search  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Lisa R supported this idea  · 
← Previous 1 3 4 5 6

Feedback and Knowledge Base