Peter Hurst

My feedback

  1. 3,398 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    412 comments  ·  Public » Messaging  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    working on it  ·  Suphatra responded

    Thank you for your suggestion! We really appreciate the feedback and idea. We have reviewed this request and started working on it. I’ll let you know as it nears completion.

    Suphatra

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Peter Hurst commented  · 

    Are we really working on this as it's now March 2021 and still no news.

  2. 4,346 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    521 comments  ·  Public » Meetings  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Peter Hurst supported this idea  · 
  3. 42 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Peter Hurst commented  · 

    @robert Kudos for coming back and explaining - thanks for being so prompt and it really helps us to explain to users what it was - I hope it helps Microsoft understand how carefully they need to control the guidance as in the times we live in any change can be seen in a prism of security and create a perceived threat.

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Peter Hurst commented  · 

    @robert - If it helps our first user "installed" the app around 10:20am on the 3rd Jan - I checked with him and all the others who had "installed" it and they saw the same behaviour as Simon noted and had accepted the app T&Cs

    We manually disabled the app and the behaviour stopped before it was withdrawn form the store. Thanks for being so quick to respond.

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Peter Hurst commented  · 

    We too have this and managed to disable the app in our teams admin - it has now disappeared. We have also raised a ticket. #23521278

  4. 1,941 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    247 comments  ·  Public » Meetings  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Peter Hurst supported this idea  · 
  5. 4,624 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    723 comments  ·  Public » Meetings  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Peter Hurst commented  · 

    We have over 30000 users and I believe (but have no empirical evidence) that this discourages many from joining the meeting as it can be distracting (much like hearing your own voice) what I would say also is that the box is filled with a "In Vision" or "Camera Live" to avoid any accidental exposure.

    Peter Hurst supported this idea  · 
  6. 343 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Peter Hurst commented  · 

    Agree and as we enter welcome week the September cut off of the increase falls into sharp focus. I note the increase to 15 hours long, this could be dropped back to 4 at most. We have 4000 staff and 15000 students so by the law of averages 30-45 will be ok. However if it's a real problem perhaps a mechanism to allow for a couple of annual flex-up periods to cover welcome weeks or events for Universities would be helpful. After all it gets the technology used by future customers.

    Peter Hurst supported this idea  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Peter Hurst commented  · 

    We have a significant number of meetings being implemented - we really need this.

  7. 846 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    112 comments  ·  Public » Meetings  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Peter Hurst supported this idea  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Peter Hurst commented  · 

    +1 - we have delegated meetings for teams which may need this as well a Adrian's example. We have 4000 or so staff and bout 10% would use this.

  8. 526 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    59 comments  ·  Public » Meetings  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Peter Hurst supported this idea  · 
  9. 20 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Peter Hurst commented  · 

    My perceived behaviour without and great testing is that already works for person to person chat. I chat with colleagues in my contact list from other Universities without them having to change. I think what your actually getting at is the ability to access Teams post channels whilst logged into their home org?

  10. 101 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    10 comments  ·  Public » IT Pro  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Peter Hurst supported this idea  · 
  11. 1,558 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    73 comments  ·  Schools and Universities » Other  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Peter Hurst supported this idea  · 
  12. 43 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    2 comments  ·  Public » Interoperability  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Peter Hurst supported this idea  · 
  13. 123 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    4 comments  ·  Public » People  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Peter Hurst supported this idea  · 
  14. 16 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    3 comments  ·  Public » Guest Access  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Peter Hurst commented  · 

    Phillipe's way of working does seem to work but it's not connected to the teams app and uses a page our users have never seen before and without understanding the tenancy concept they will likely sign out of the wrong thing. Having the capability in the App you signed up in would be better.

    Peter Hurst supported this idea  · 
  15. 31 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    6 comments  ·  Public » Meetings  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Peter Hurst commented  · 

    We too would like somthing for the more formal meetings where aganedas can be standardised, worked on by part of the team (like a private channel) and published to the rest of the group.It's alos missing the capability to discuss, annotate privately and share comments within the meeting and a automated minutint collation/distribution process. Then ideally a meeting document archiving process. I realise not all of these would be possible but others have done this on a sharepoint base (boardpacks)

    Peter Hurst supported this idea  · 
  16. 8 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Schools and Universities  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Peter Hurst commented  · 

    We have approximately 10000 staff an students using Word online and they would find this a vast improvement to the online experience of using the 365 products which link to word online like teams.

    Peter Hurst supported this idea  · 
  17. 2,554 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    454 comments  ·  Public » Teams and Channels  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Peter Hurst commented  · 

    I don't thik @everyone is suitable in a large environent - but it may be sensible to have some limited intelligence . Formal groups should be created for HR groups but bearing in mind the ad-hoc and flxible aim of teams it would be nice to have selected GAL attributes available, the sort of stuff an IDM system can't work out for cross specialism groups. So for example I may want a team with @title="project manager" or @department="marketing" or @location="Manchester" alongside just adding individuals. Just saying "use a group" formalises somthing which is in it's best incarnation crossing formal boundaries.

  18. 126 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    20 comments  ·  Public » Calling  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Peter Hurst commented  · 

    We are investigating teams for our university, however hunt groups are key to an enterprise scale deployment to our 3000 staff (about 10-20% would be part of hunt groups. At present the lack of a one stop shop for telephony would prevent use looking at Teams telephony. If MS are serious about this they either need to encompass the core telephony functions or improve integration with third party suppliers like cisco and mitel.

  19. 598 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    47 comments  ·  Public » IT Pro  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Peter Hurst commented  · 

    Our new Teams admin console now lists about 50% of the teams created in our tenancy (it does the same on another tenancy) listing about 80 when we have about 160. it would be great if we could have the first part working before moving on to the second. Our Prem support people say "it's working through the system" and can't fix it.

  20. 11 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Public » Mobile  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Peter Hurst supported this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base