jbedford

My feedback

  1. 30 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    4 comments  ·  Public » UX/Design  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    jbedford commented  · 

    Also, it would be great if the active speaker / presenter was always centered (even if this meant that their feed was duplicated elsewhere).

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    jbedford commented  · 

    Yes, please! As a previous comment said, though, the camera location should be configurable. Not all cameras are at top-center (though many seem to be).

    jbedford supported this idea  · 
  2. 2 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    jbedford supported this idea  · 
  3. 47 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    10 comments  ·  Public » Notifications  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    jbedford commented  · 

    Finally, if multiple people raise their hand, then they should be displayed in order from first-to-last chronologically.

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    jbedford commented  · 

    Also would be good to have an option for the list of people w/ raised hands to show up / hover over the main presentation screen (if someone is presenting) or above the main video if someone is pinned.

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    jbedford commented  · 

    Agreed! At least the people w/ raised hands should have their video/name moved to the top of the Participants list, and also bumped to be in the set of people on the main screen or under the main presenter's video.

    jbedford supported this idea  · 
  4. 104 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    jbedford commented  · 

    Yes, please! Especially Forms!

    jbedford supported this idea  · 
  5. 2 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Public » Teams and Channels  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    jbedford supported this idea  · 
  6. 2 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Public » Teams and Channels  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    jbedford supported this idea  · 
  7. 12 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    3 comments  ·  Public » Teams and Channels  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    jbedford supported this idea  · 
  8. 20 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    4 comments  ·  Public » Teams and Channels  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    jbedford supported this idea  · 
  9. 18 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Public » Teams and Channels  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    jbedford supported this idea  · 
  10. 22 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    4 comments  ·  Public » Teams and Channels  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    jbedford supported this idea  · 
  11. 9 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Schools and Universities  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    jbedford supported this idea  · 
  12. 204 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    25 comments  ·  Public » Teams and Channels  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    jbedford supported this idea  · 
  13. 244 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    21 comments  ·  Public » Teams and Channels  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    jbedford supported this idea  · 
  14. 17 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    4 comments  ·  Bug Reports » Teams & Channels  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    jbedford commented  · 

    Adding my voice here. This definitely leads to confusion for our users.

    jbedford supported this idea  · 
  15. 1 vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Public » Teams and Channels  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    jbedford shared this idea  · 
  16. 40 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    3 comments  ·  Public » Teams and Channels  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    jbedford supported this idea  · 
  17. 365 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    65 comments  ·  Public » Teams and Channels  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    try this instead  ·  Warren responded

    Updating the status to “Try this instead” and have added the clarification that after 30 days the name is once again available.

    The reason for this decision was that Channels can be restored 30 days after being deleted. During this time, we intentionally don’t support creating a channel with the same name. After the 30 days, the name is available.

    You can workaround this by restoring a deleted channel, renaming it, and then deleting the channel again. The previous name is then available for use.

    This workaround has already been mentioned in the comments and if an immediate reuse of a Channel Name is required, this is the recommended solution.
    -Warren

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    jbedford commented  · 

    It'd be preferable to have deleted channels be automatically renamed on the back end to enable new channels to be created with their original names. Perhaps could have some kind of GUID appended to it? Or as a hidden attribute?

    Then, if a deleted channel needs to be restored, the user should be prompted in the case that the channel name is taken. User could select a new name for the restored channel.

    Managing associated files on SharePoint may be trickier. The way the SharePoint folders currently work is not all that great, though. It's annoying that renaming a channel does not rename the underlying SharePoint folder -- this creates a mismatch between the Channel name and the Folder name which is inherently confusing.

    Again, prompting the user when renaming a Channel if the new name is already taken (either by existing Channel or existing Folder) would be preferable to not auto-renaming the folder.

    jbedford supported this idea  · 
  18. 4 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    3 comments  ·  Bug Reports » Accessibility  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    jbedford supported this idea  · 
  19. 103 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    14 comments  ·  Public » Messaging  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    jbedford commented  · 

    I'd like this, too!

    Allowing @team or @channel within chats seems like a very quick fix. (None of these currently work.)

    I also like the idea of @all or @chat or @group (since chats w/ multiple people seem to be called "Groups" in Teams) or @<custom-group-name> if there is one, though.

    jbedford supported this idea  · 
  20. 10 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    4 comments  ·  Public » Teams and Channels  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    jbedford commented  · 

    Adding my voice to this request. This would be very helpful for chats with multiple people.

    Doesn't need to be @all, though. Could also just allow @team or @channel within chats -- seems that'd serve the same purpose.

    Why not enable this?

    jbedford supported this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base