Alex Carlock

My feedback

  1. 7 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Public » Teams and Channels  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Alex Carlock commented  · 

    As we're looking at Private Channels, we're realizing the same thing. We want to have one Team per client/prospect with a channel for each Pursuit or project. We don't want the client to see the pursuits, but we want to grant them access to specific project channels. We know we can create a private team and a public team, but that leads to Team sprawl with at least two per client. If we could invite a person (internal or external) to a Channel directly, that would solve the issue for us. Since Private Channels use their own SharePoint Site, this seems like something that could be done.

    Alex Carlock supported this idea  · 
  2. 1 vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Public » Notifications  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Alex Carlock shared this idea  · 
  3. 8 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    2 comments  ·  Public » Messaging  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Alex Carlock supported this idea  · 
  4. 1 vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Public » Calling  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Alex Carlock shared this idea  · 
  5. 1,747 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    237 comments  ·  Public » Meetings  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Alex Carlock supported this idea  · 
  6. 2 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Public » IP Phones  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Alex Carlock supported this idea  · 
  7. 8 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Public » Calling  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Alex Carlock commented  · 

    I'm amazed teams doesn't already have this. Skype for Business had it. They should display the CNAM info sent by the phone company, and allow me to override that using a contact listed in my Outlook.

    Alex Carlock supported this idea  · 
  8. 1,294 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    82 comments  ·  Public » Teams and Channels  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    on the backlog  ·  Warren responded

    This item is still queued up in the backlog. No additional details are available at this moment.

    -Warren

    Alex Carlock supported this idea  · 
  9. 2,011 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    265 comments  ·  Public » UX/Design  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    under review  ·  Warren responded

    This feature is still being reviewed by the feature team. No decision has been made yet. I’ll keep you posted.

    -Warren

    Alex Carlock commented  · 

    If anything, this should be a personal setting. I see chats as mostly 1:1 conversations with people that aren't always relevant to team work. Team chats are relevant for everyone on the team to see. So to me, it makes sense to keep these separate.

  10. 2,443 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    323 comments  ·  Public » Files  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    working on it  ·  Warren responded

    This feature request is now actively being worked upon. As we move through the development process, I will post an new updates to this topic.

    Please keep the votes and feedback coming in. Your feedback is shared with the feature team every month.

    -Warren

    Alex Carlock supported this idea  · 
  11. 286 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    16 comments  ·  Public » Meetings  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Alex Carlock supported this idea  · 
  12. 2,769 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    78 comments  ·  Public » Teams and Channels  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    on the backlog  ·  Warren responded

    Due to a priority shift this request has slipped to the backlog. I hate to bring bad news. I will continue to provide the feature team your feedback and votes.
    Hopefully this will move back up in the queue soon.

    -Warren

    Alex Carlock supported this idea  · 
  13. 3,267 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    215 comments  ·  Public » Search  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    planned  ·  Warren responded

    This feature request has moved to the planning stage. There have also been several small updates that have gone out already, as well.

    I’ll keep you posted as I hear more about coming updates.

    -Warren

    Alex Carlock supported this idea  · 
  14. 5,096 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    348 comments  ·  Public » Teams and Channels  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    working on it  ·  Suphatra responded

    Thanks for following our suggestion to vote this up on SharePoint. It worked! SharePoint has confirmed that they have already started working on this and I’ll be getting an ETA from them after the holidays. -Suphatra

    Alex Carlock supported this idea  · 
  15. 11,068 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1278 comments  ·  Public » Teams and Channels  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Alex Carlock supported this idea  · 
  16. 2,353 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    358 comments  ·  Public » Teams and Channels  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Alex Carlock supported this idea  · 
  17. 46 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    3 comments  ·  Public » Meetings  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Alex Carlock supported this idea  · 
  18. 17 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Public » Search  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Alex Carlock supported this idea  · 
  19. 36 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    4 comments  ·  Public » Meetings  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Alex Carlock commented  · 

    We've also run into this issue. We want the ability for meeting organizers to decide if a meeting is recorded or not and prevent others from recording it. There is a policy that would block all meetings by an organizer from being recorded, but that doesn't work if the organizer wants to record some meetings but not others. We're going to have to License a separate user to be used for confidential corporate meetings. That seems like a waste of a license when a per meeting option would suffice.

    Alex Carlock supported this idea  · 
  20. 2 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Public » IT Pro - Controls and Knobs  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Alex Carlock supported this idea  · 
← Previous 1 3

Feedback and Knowledge Base