Anonymous

My feedback

  1. 8,805 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    726 comments  ·  Public » Messaging  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Anonymous commented  · 

    I'm vexed. I can't believe this still isn't fixed. You sent a survey with different concepts over a year ago. I should not have to provide training on how to reply to a flipping message! I'm so tired of having to point out to people that they started a new post instead of replying, then them being like "oh can you fix it for me?" then me being like "no, but let me show you how", then them making the same mistake 20 minutes later.

    Sure, users suck and supporting them is a pain - every IT professional knows this, I'm sure - but this is just straight up bad design and your response to the problem is infuriatingly slow - I don't know who's in charge of prioritising work, but I beg you, whoever you are, I'm so tired of this problem, it's exhausting, please, please, please, make this a higher priority to resolve.

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Anonymous commented  · 

    It's been over a year since the last update on this... what's the latest?

    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  2. 25 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    4 comments  ·  Public » Emojis and GIFs  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Anonymous commented  · 

    Honestly, the amount of times I've sent a GIF that turned out to have an ending that completely changed its meaning is insane. This is a very silly design. It's almost as much of a problem for communication as the problem with the visual delineation between a reply and a new post that you've been working on for years and still not fixed. I'm vexed btw.

    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  3. 14,893 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    889 comments  ·  Public » Meetings  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  4. 1 vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Public » Live Events  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous shared this idea  · 
  5. 243 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    24 comments  ·  Public » UX/Design  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Anonymous commented  · 

    We want this feature and NOT because of people mistakingly starting a new conversation when they should have replied. (Please just change the UI already to fix that problem!)

    Sometimes a conversation is started by someone who missed the exact same conversation a week or 2 before. Often though, they'll add a new perspective or piece of information, so the conversation continues in their new thread. To avoid covering old ground, and so that everyone can see the full conversation easily, we'd like users to be able to somehow "link" the new conversation with the old conversation - whether that is a simple merge of the 2 threads or by some other means.

  6. 255 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    9 comments  ·  Public » Messaging  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  7. 321 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    11 comments  ·  Public » Messaging  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  8. 86 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    7 comments  ·  Public » Bots  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Anonymous commented  · 

    A native polling option would be great, even if it was basic. Polly has become confusing to some users and features a big promotion to get the paid product which isn't a nice user experience. We could use a Microsoft Form, but something that was quicker to create and could be embedded in the message would be much nicer.

    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  9. 60 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Anonymous commented  · 

    On the light theme, not a single one of the colours meets AA accessibility standards. Now, to be fair, you can switch to the dark or high contrast modes to solve this problem if you have any sight problems - BUT most of them aren't even close to being accessible, and I, with my perfectly good eyesight find it difficult to read some of them, and annoying to read the rest (on light theme).

    Below is a table, including the official AA accessibility rating (4.5 required to pass) and my own personal rating from 1-5 where 1 is extremely difficult to read, and 5 is extremely easy to read (on the light theme):

    Colour (AA): Rating
    #deb7ca (1.78): 1
    #b197cb (2.57): 2
    #6888c9 (3.52): 5
    #64c6ca (2.00): 3
    #9ed267 (1.76): 3
    #fcd116 (1.47): 2
    #ec8f45 (2.44): 4
    #f0f2f4 (1.12): 1
    #16233a85 (N/A): 1;

    As you can see, I, with my perfectly good eyesight find only 2 of them easy to read.

    Bear in mind, we don't all have fancy retina display macbook's, many people are still using rubbish 10 year old monitors.

    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  10. 64 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    12 comments  ·  Public » Calling  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
  11. 46 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    5 comments  ·  Public » Calling  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
  12. 14 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    2 comments  ·  Public » Meetings  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
  13. 11 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Public » Messaging  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Anonymous commented  · 
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  14. 86 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    12 comments  ·  Public » Notifications  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  15. 3 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Public » Calendar  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Anonymous commented  · 

    Has this changed? Did it used to be true? Some of our old teams do receive email invitations, but all our newly created teams do not.

    This article (https://mattsoseman.com/2018/01/06/why-do-i-receive-invites-to-channel-meetings-in-microsoft-teams-mystery-solved/) from 2018 suggests that this setting use to be set to true by default. In which case, when and why did it change?

  16. 862 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    71 comments  ·  Public » Search  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    working on it  ·  Warren responded

    This feature request has now moved to “working on it”. The team is actively working on this request and I will share more details as they become available.

    -Warren

    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  17. 22,058 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    2648 comments  ·  Public » Teams and Channels  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  18. 56,657 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    6507 comments  ·  Public » Meetings  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    I’m excited to announce that the new Large Gallery view, allowing users to see up to 49 participant in a meeting, has started rolling out! Large Gallery will release as an optional (preview) feature that can be turned on at any time during a meeting, and will be available in desktop Teams client on both Windows & Mac. We are pushing the updates via a cloud update. The minimum desktop build needed is 19173 or later. If you have this build you will see the new feature once the cloud update is pushed to you, over the coming weeks.

    You can read more about Large gallery view, Together mode, as well as other new meetings experiences here: https://techcommunity.microsoft.com/t5/microsoft-teams-blog/new-meeting-and-calling-experience-in-microsoft-teams/ba-p/1537581.

    For more details, check out the Roadmap item: https://www.microsoft.com/microsoft-365/roadmap?filters=&searchterms=65333.

    Thanks,
    Alex & the Teams team

    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  19. 3,373 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    441 comments  ·  Public » Teams and Channels  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  20. 212 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    9 comments  ·  Public » Search  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
← Previous 1

Feedback and Knowledge Base