Josh

My feedback

  1. 3,299 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    389 comments  ·  Public » Messaging  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Josh commented  · 

    I see that the development and product teams are still staffed entirely by Walmart greeters.

    Josh commented  · 

    I'd like to point out that this is literally the primary use case of Teams. Your product managers are idiots. i'd say your UX people are also idiots, but you clearly don't have any.

    Josh commented  · 

    June now, I'm guessing the timeframe is "another 2 years."

    Josh commented  · 

    Microsoft: We have this great idea for threaded conversations in a chat client!
    Microsoft: I wonder why nobody has done this before?
    Everyone: ...
    Microsoft: Let's just make it, it's genius!
    Everyone: ...wtf wait
    Microsoft: Why is everyone complaining? Oh well, BLURRY VIDEO BACKGROUNDS!
    Everyone: Fix your f***ing chat UI!
    Microsoft: *continues playing with *****
    -- 2 years pass --
    Microsoft: People are still complaining, maybe we should prototype the primary use case of our app?
    Everyone: FFFFFFFUUUUUUUUUUU

    Josh commented  · 

    Is this dumpster fire of a UI getting fixed any time soon?

    Josh commented  · 

    One assumes that in turning the bottom input into a "New Conversation" button, you could also show the "Reply" input by default for every conversation. You could also do a material style floating action button with a "+" for new convos, if you didn't want to continue your flagrant abuse of vertical space.

    One also assumes that you could put an actual designer on this, and prototype with actual people, but since this has clearly never been done I don't know why you'd start now. By all means keep adding features like background video blur instead of spending a day of development time on your primary use case, 1.5+ years later.

    Josh commented  · 

    It would probably be a good idea to drop some mockups or a preview of the feature or it just makes it look like you're avoiding potential criticism or feedback. Or more accurately, delaying it.

    Josh supported this idea  · 
  2. 4,915 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    862 comments  ·  Public » Messaging  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Josh commented  · 

    Clippy was the best part of Teams, and Clippy was never good.

  3. 74 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    22 comments  ·  Public » Desktop  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Josh commented  · 

    I think the solution to this is just lighting the application on fire and then using something else.

    Josh supported this idea  · 
  4. 1,467 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    110 comments  ·  Public » Teams and Channels  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    under review  ·  Warren responded

    The feature team is still considering this item. No confirmation yet.
    -Warren

    Josh commented  · 

    All of you people trying to migrate to Teams from actual chat clients should probably try using Teams first before your entire company hates you for it.

  5. 11,709 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    942 comments  ·  Public » Teams and Channels  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    We know you are patiently waiting for this feature. This feature is being implemented in stages. Fast tenant switching is currently in testing both internally and with early customers. We expect to release to the public in the Fall. I’ll post an update once it’s rolling out.

    Full multi-tenant, multi-user support will be added after fast tenant switching.

    ~Alex

  6. 3,928 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    499 comments  ·  Public » Wiki  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    planned  ·  Warren responded

    This feature is still in the planning stage. No new updates are available at this time.

    -Warren

    Josh commented  · 

    hahahahahahahahaha

    Josh supported this idea  · 
  7. 10,869 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1223 comments  ·  Public » UX/Design  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Josh supported this idea  · 
  8. 62 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    4 comments  ·  Public » Teams and Channels  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Josh supported this idea  · 
  9. 154 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    61 comments  ·  Public » Teams and Channels  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    try this instead  ·  Suphatra responded

    Currently we have Teams defaulted to show you the first (up to five) channels ever created. If you want to add more channels to your left rail view, just click the ellipses next to the channel name and select “Favorite”. When you favorite the channel, it will then be “pinned” to your left rail under that team name.

    Try that and let me know if that meets your needs!

    Suphatra

    Josh commented  · 

    I see this continues to be dumb into 2019.

    Josh commented  · 

    Currently Teams has a lot of idiotic "defaults." Abusing the favorites function isn't a solution, it's a workaround to a dumb, easily remedied design decision.

    Josh supported this idea  · 
  10. 1,932 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    254 comments  ·  Public » UX/Design  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    under review  ·  Warren responded

    This feature is still being reviewed by the feature team. No decision has been made yet. I’ll keep you posted.

    -Warren

    Josh supported this idea  · 
  11. 353 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    49 comments  ·  Public » Notifications  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    working on it  ·  Warren responded

    This is still being worked upon and making good progress! Stay tuned for additional updates.

    -Warren

    Josh supported this idea  · 
  12. 2,008 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    199 comments  ·  Public » Messaging  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    declined  ·  Warren responded

    Hate to be the bearer of bad news. This item has been declined. There will be no work to hide or remove the reply button.

    As many people have commented, a big ask is to help improve how people distinguish between giving a reply and starting a new message.
    For that the focus will be on this item. “Better visual delineation between `Reply` and `Start a new conversation`”
    http://microsoftteams.uservoice.com/forums/555103/suggestions/19224826

    Josh supported this idea  · 
  13. 961 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    152 comments  ·  Public » Notifications  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    under review  ·  Warren responded

    This item is still being reviewed and pending a decision. No new details at this time.

    -Warren

    Josh commented  · 

    Just the thing for transitioning a company to Teams, a chat client that doesn't notify you about chats. Maybe this is actually a productivity feature?

    I can only assume the same idiot who decided we should only see 3 channels at a time is leading the charge on this one too.

    Josh supported this idea  · 
  14. 2,251 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    266 comments  ·  Public » Notifications  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Josh supported this idea  · 
  15. 2,360 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    66 comments  ·  Public » Notifications  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Josh supported this idea  · 
  16. 6,393 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    working on it  ·  406 comments  ·  Public » Notifications  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Josh supported this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base



You are about to visit the UserVoice site for Microsoft Teams

We have partnered with UserVoice, a 3rd party service providing public discussion forums for product-specific feedback.

By clicking "Continue to UserVoice" you agree to UserVoice's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.