Steve Ruby

My feedback

  1. 294 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    24 comments  ·  Public » Teams and Channels  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Steve Ruby supported this idea  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Steve Ruby commented  · 

    Maybe not exactly something that works for everyone but you can remove people from the meeting that are no longer participants.

  2. 129 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    10 comments  ·  Public » Tabs  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Steve Ruby supported this idea  · 
  3. 1,131 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    71 comments  ·  Public » Messaging  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Steve Ruby commented  · 

    Agree. This a primary limitations vs email. Once I read something it is marked trad and has no priority vs all other messages. I need to mark for follow up and then see my marked queue.

    Steve Ruby supported this idea  · 
  4. 5 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Bug Reports » Client - Android  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Steve Ruby commented  · 

    Same here. Basic long hold to select isn't available is this a big. Should be OS standard.

    Steve Ruby supported this idea  · 
  5. 10,104 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1475 comments  ·  Public » Messaging  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    under review  ·  Warren responded

    This item is still under review. No new updates at this time.
    -Warren

    Steve Ruby supported this idea  · 
  6. 329 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    38 comments  ·  Public » Teams and Channels  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Steve Ruby supported this idea  · 
  7. 937 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    81 comments  ·  Public » People  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Steve Ruby supported this idea  · 
  8. 479 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    44 comments  ·  Public » Presence  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Steve Ruby supported this idea  · 
  9. 324 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    29 comments  ·  Public » People  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Steve Ruby supported this idea  · 
  10. 10,123 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1235 comments  ·  Public » Wiki  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Steve Ruby supported this idea  · 
  11. 1,468 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    217 comments  ·  Public » Files  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Steve Ruby supported this idea  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Steve Ruby commented  · 

    Any update?

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Steve Ruby commented  · 

    We already have a sharepoint folder structure for the team, we need to point the channels to that rather than creating more document libraries to scatter files across.

  12. 20,262 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1773 comments  ·  Public » UX/Design  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Steve Ruby supported this idea  · 
  13. 905 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    186 comments  ·  Public » Teams and Channels  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    partially done  ·  Warren responded

    As mentioned in the prior status, the channel limit was raised from 100 to 200.

    In the near future a retention limit will be set so you can still go back and reinstate a channel you had deleted. Once the retention period has expired then the channel will get a hard delete which will free up the space and no longer count toward the 200 channel limit.

    This will help with some of the issues you have voiced in the comments below.
    But I understand many of you wish the limit to be further increased. I will continue to provide your votes and comments to the feature team.

    -Warren

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Steve Ruby commented  · 

    Please raise this limit, or allow is to configure on our own. We need to use one channel per project and will hit 200 in about a year. There isn't a limit on sharepoint directories so why the teams count limit?

    Steve Ruby supported this idea  · 
  14. 14,921 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    876 comments  ·  Public » Teams and Channels  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Steve Ruby supported this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base