Raf

My feedback

  1. 392 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    27 comments  ·  Public » People  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Raf supported this idea  · 
  2. 873 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    102 comments  ·  Public » Presence  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Raf supported this idea  · 
  3. 508 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    26 comments  ·  Public » Presence  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Raf supported this idea  · 
  4. 215 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    14 comments  ·  Public » Getting Started  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Raf supported this idea  · 
  5. 946 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    85 comments  ·  Public » Meetings  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Raf supported this idea  · 
  6. 838 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    under review  ·  Warren responded

    The team is still reviewing this item. I hope to know of a decision soon.

    -Warren

    Raf commented  · 

    Instead of adding more and more questionable quality 3rd party apps to the store you should really nail the Microsoft ecosystem interoperability such as this MS Project integration.

  7. 2,797 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    522 comments  ·  Public » Messaging  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Raf commented  · 

    Am I right thinking this was possible with Skype for Business, and now the Teams, which replaces it, does not support calls to regular Skype anymore? That's one way to shoot yourself in the foot.

  8. 3,378 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    118 comments  ·  Public » Meetings  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Raf supported this idea  · 
    Raf commented  · 

    You are phasing out Skype for Business, which has whiteboard, pools, Q&A etc. but this is not available in Teams yet? We are trying to stick to MS O365 but this makes is soo hard. It's sad, really, I've seen article somewhere last year talking about that S4B and Teams functionality parity has been achieved.

  9. 12,309 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    998 comments  ·  Public » Teams and Channels  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    We know you are patiently waiting for this feature. This feature is being implemented in stages. Fast tenant switching is currently in testing both internally and with early customers. We expect to release to the public in the Fall. I’ll post an update once it’s rolling out.

    Full multi-tenant, multi-user support will be added after fast tenant switching.

    ~Alex

    Raf commented  · 

    Many other feedbacks are just too improve quality of use, this is, however, key deciding factor why my client doesn't way to embrace teams, even though they use 365E1, because it's paint to log out and in for different accounts.

    Raf supported this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base



You are about to visit the UserVoice site for Microsoft Teams

We have partnered with UserVoice, a 3rd party service providing public discussion forums for product-specific feedback.

By clicking "Continue to UserVoice" you agree to UserVoice's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.