Allan

My feedback

  1. 21 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    4 comments  ·  Public » Teams and Channels  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Allan commented  · 

    By having separate libraries for each channel you also get these benefits:
    - Easier to have separate permissions for each channel and even sharing settings
    - No more folders in the default doclib that confuses people, especially when they get renamed, deleted, etc
    - Makes it possible to associate the default doclib with the general channel so everything that is created in the SharePoint default doclib can show up in Teams, unlike today where people are confused as to why their content sometimes doesn't show up.

    With this it should of course become possible to:
    - Reassociate an existing channel with a new doclib and move its content to the new doclib

    Allan supported this idea  · 
  2. 4,078 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    283 comments  ·  Public » Teams and Channels  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    working on it  ·  Suphatra responded

    Thanks for following our suggestion to vote this up on SharePoint. It worked! SharePoint has confirmed that they have already started working on this and I’ll be getting an ETA from them after the holidays. -Suphatra

    Allan commented  · 

    Listen, channels should never have had just a folder in the default doclib to begin with, they should each have their own doclib instead. This would have made things much simpler!

    The general channel could have used the default doclib and anything you put there would have been immediately visible from Teams.

    No more confusion as to why folders created in the root in SharePoint aren't visible in teams. No more confusion as to what those folders belonging to teams channels are doing in SharePoint.

    And no more confusion regarding renaming channels and corresponding folder folders. Now you do get a new problem as renaming a doclib is no simple matter if it means renaming the URL and people are syncing it using OneDrive, linking to it, etc. But that's another discussion.

    I encourage people to go vote for this feature if they agree:
    https://microsoftteams.uservoice.com/forums/555103-public/suggestions/32420623-seperate-libraries-for-channels

  3. 10 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Public » Teams and Channels  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Allan supported this idea  · 
  4. 10 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Public » Teams and Channels  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Allan supported this idea  · 
  5. 4,060 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    139 comments  ·  Public » Calendar  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    working on it  ·  Suphatra responded

    Sorry for the delay on an update on this one! I’m hunting down the status for you and will update once I have it.

    Also, if you are interested in participating in testing or surveys for this, just tweet me at @skprufo.

    Suphatra

    Allan supported this idea  · 
  6. 9,208 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1046 comments  ·  Public » Teams and Channels  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Allan supported this idea  · 
  7. 8,492 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    549 comments  ·  Public » Teams and Channels  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Allan supported this idea  · 
  8. 9,084 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    954 comments  ·  Public » UX/Design  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Allan supported this idea  · 
    Allan commented  · 

    Teams has so many features packed into one interface, we need to be able to open up things separately. Not only chat, but also documents, tabs, meetings, planner, etc.

  9. 6,543 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    571 comments  ·  Public » Performance  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Performance has been and continues to be a big focus area for Teams. One main area we have made improvements in is responsiveness for the most frequent user actions of switching between Chat, Channel, and Activity. We are also focused on reducing resource consumption and application load time. More improvements are on the way.

    ~Alex

    Allan supported this idea  · 
  10. 7,483 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    319 comments  ·  Public » Presence  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Allan supported this idea  · 
  11. 756 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    80 comments  ·  Public » UX/Design  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    planned  ·  Warren responded

    This feature request is now in the planning stage. As more details become available, I will post them here.

    -Warren

    Allan supported this idea  · 
  12. 6,236 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    working on it  ·  399 comments  ·  Public » Notifications  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Allan supported this idea  · 
  13. 11,076 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    900 comments  ·  Public » Teams and Channels  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    We know you are patiently waiting for this feature. This feature is being implemented in stages. Fast tenant switching is currently in testing both internally and with early customers. We expect to release to the public in the Fall. I’ll post an update once it’s rolling out.

    Full multi-tenant, multi-user support will be added after fast tenant switching.

    ~Alex

    Allan supported this idea  · 
  14. 10,979 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    957 comments  ·  Public » Calendar  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Allan supported this idea  · 
  15. 23,202 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1889 comments  ·  Public » Teams and Channels  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    We acknowledge the customer demand for Private Channels and have been hard at work on it. Private Channels is currently in preview with a select group of customers. We expect to release the feature to the public later this Fall, and will update here when we are starting to roll out to all customers. We appreciate all the feedback you have provided to us on this forum and thank you for your patience.

    ~Alex

    Allan commented  · 

    Good to hear the feature is coming. I want to echo what others are saying that while it’d be a start, it wouldn’t be enough if the only thing implemented were channels private to only the members of the team. We need something along the lines of the rest of what the original poster requested and/or the ability to control who can see each channel.

    Allan supported this idea  · 
  16. 39 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    4 comments  ·  Public » Calling  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Allan commented  · 

    We really would like to see this too. We have bought a competing product, because it had that feature (and maybe one other) that SkypeFB/Teams couldn't deliver. We're in education, by the way.

    Allan supported this idea  · 
  17. 129 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    14 comments  ·  Public » Meetings  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Allan supported this idea  · 
  18. 23 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    3 comments  ·  Public » Teams and Channels  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Allan commented  · 

    Wow, I'm surprised this hasn't gotten more votes… Seems like a really useful feature - for education too.

    Allan supported this idea  · 
  19. 161 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    18 comments  ·  Public » Meetings  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Allan supported this idea  · 
  20. 10,521 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1200 comments  ·  Public » UX/Design  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Allan supported this idea  · 
← Previous 1

Feedback and Knowledge Base



You are about to visit the UserVoice site for Microsoft Teams

We have partnered with UserVoice, a 3rd party service providing public discussion forums for product-specific feedback.

By clicking "Continue to UserVoice" you agree to UserVoice's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.