Roland

My feedback

  1. 2,430 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    423 comments  ·  Public » Teams and Channels  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Roland commented  · 

    One of the biggest annoyances in using Teams: being unable to sort, filter, search and order channels. For some reason, sometimes channels switch position. We have renamed all channels to start with numbers, so we can put them back into place more easily. Drag and drop is cumbersome. Re-ordering is taking many clicks and a lot of time.

    Roland supported this idea  · 
  2. 19,651 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1066 comments  ·  Public » Teams and Channels  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Roland supported this idea  · 
  3. 8,279 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1157 comments  ·  Public » Teams and Channels  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Roland commented  · 

    We're using a dedicated channel per customer project where all members have access to all general information. Within each customer project channel we set-up private sub-channels for activities with selected members (eg. technical, commercial, development, administrative). Each sub-channel has its own planning and activities. It would be good to have private tasks, planner, milestones etc. within a private channel. Not having this defeats the purpose of limited/secured environments: it would mean that instead of a sub-channel, for each private/limited environment a new main channel needs to be created.

    Roland supported this idea  · 
  4. 40 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    6 comments  ·  Public » Guest Access  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Roland commented  · 

    +1 for this suggestion. Would be a nice addition.

  5. 13 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    3 comments  ·  Public » Teams and Channels  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Roland commented  · 

    Here is what I wrote earlier:

    "Allow Teams to use external Premium/Essential license to connect on 1 domain

    Instead of having a domain owner assign Premium/Essential licenses to external users for the sake of allowing them to work under their domain in Teams, allow external Premium/Essential licenses to be registered under that domain and have these users purchase and use their own copy to do so.

    Example:

    We want to use Microsoft Teams to work on projects. Our user group consists of independent external colleagues. Teams is using the company domain. The users have an existing domain e-mail address. They wish to purchase their own O365 Premium or Essential license and connect that with an existing Teams environment. This is not possible today.

    Either: a user is assigned a license from within Teams and automatically gets domain credentials. This means that the domain owner is paying for all licenses for all users.

    Or: a user gets its own license, with its own domain and then applies for access. This means the user pays for the license, but also gets their own Teams domain.

    The alternative is (limited) guest accounts.

    We want users to register their existing e-mail addresses from one domain as credentials for the purchase of their own license and then connect to Teams."

    And, after speaking with support, I added the following:

    "Just learned that applying for a Business Premium subscription includes an implicit request for the creation of a tenant/domain for that one account. My suggestion would be to have a choice when signing up between activation of that single new tenant/domain or joining an existing tenant/domain. If the latter, the owner of the existing tenant/domain would need to accept the application or actively drive such application. "

  6. 64 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    8 comments  ·  Public » UX/Design  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Roland commented  · 

    +1 for this suggestion. Would be a very good addition!

  7. 43 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Public » Bots  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Roland commented  · 

    Totally agree: I am trying to delete an automated message from a bot (connected service). Being the owner of the Team/Channel, I would expect to be able to moderate the chat thread. It is weird that I can't delete chat messages as owner. And while the workaround to ask team members to delete one of their chats messages is tedious but an option, this is not possible for automated non-member messages.

  8. 20,412 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    2069 comments  ·  Public » Messaging  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Roland commented  · 

    +1 for this. I would argue that Team owners should be able to delete any and all messages if so required. This applies to public and private messages, and certainly the automated bot messages in conversations.

  9. 9,611 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    243 comments  ·  Public » Calendar  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    The team has delivered improvements to the New Meeting experience in Calendar such as optional attendees, richer custom recurrence UX, as well as enhanced meeting RSVPs.

    To learn more about RSVPing to meetings in the Teams Calendar, how to create a recurring meeting, and the new meeting scheduling experience including the scheduling assistant, please visit https://support.microsoft.com/office/schedule-a-meeting-in-teams-943507a9-8583-4c58-b5d2-8ec8265e04e5.

    Thanks!

    Roland supported this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base