Anonymous

My feedback

  1. 8,682 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    229 comments  ·  Public » Calendar  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    The team has delivered improvements to the New Meeting experience in Calendar such as optional attendees, richer custom recurrence UX, as well as enhanced meeting RSVPs.

    To learn more about RSVPing to meetings in the Teams Calendar, how to create a recurring meeting, and the new meeting scheduling experience including the scheduling assistant, please visit https://support.microsoft.com/office/schedule-a-meeting-in-teams-943507a9-8583-4c58-b5d2-8ec8265e04e5.

    Thanks!

    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  2. 253 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    15 comments  ·  Public » Teams and Channels  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  3. 20,667 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1319 comments  ·  Public » Calendar  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  4. 70 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    under review  ·  5 comments  ·  Public » IT Pro  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Anonymous commented  · 

    This sounds similar to Private Channel feature requested in some other thread.

    In our team we have a small group of individuals who work as developers and also take care of logistic needs of the team, now they don't want to bombard the entire team with their conversations which is irrelevant to other developers. A Private Channel is a great way to handle this, but personally I think having a private conversation within the public conversation window is a very bad idea.

    If it's a conversation between two people you must be using the chat option as Ross mentioned.

  5. 861 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    103 comments  ·  Public » Meetings  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  6. 3,104 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    429 comments  ·  Public » UX/Design  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Anonymous commented  · 

    I disagree with this as well, the current design provides a clear separation between private chats and team conversations.

    Chat is a single continuous conversation with an individual and Teams provide a collaborative platform for a group of people where multiple conversations can run in parallel.

    Chat is not a team activity, it's an individual conversation and should never be put under the same tab.

    This forum should have an option to down vote a feature, so that we can get and idea of how many do not agree to a particular idea.

  7. 19 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    2 comments  ·  Public » Planner  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Anonymous commented  · 

    This will be a very helpful feature, but rather than just giving percentages it would be better if,
    1. we keep the status as it is (Started/In Progress/Completed)
    2. add a progress bar on the task tile
    3. add weights to Checklist Items in each task

    The progress bar on the tile should display the % based on number of checklist items ticked.

Feedback and Knowledge Base