Anonymous

My feedback

  1. 5,255 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    170 comments  ·  Public » Calendar  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  2. 70 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Public » Teams and Channels  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  3. 13,581 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1100 comments  ·  Public » Calendar  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  4. 59 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    under review  ·  5 comments  ·  Public » IT Pro  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous commented  · 

    This sounds similar to Private Channel feature requested in some other thread.

    In our team we have a small group of individuals who work as developers and also take care of logistic needs of the team, now they don't want to bombard the entire team with their conversations which is irrelevant to other developers. A Private Channel is a great way to handle this, but personally I think having a private conversation within the public conversation window is a very bad idea.

    If it's a conversation between two people you must be using the chat option as Ross mentioned.

  5. 426 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    50 comments  ·  Public » Meetings  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  6. 2,214 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    294 comments  ·  Public » UX/Design  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    under review  ·  Warren responded

    This feature is still being reviewed by the feature team. No decision has been made yet. I’ll keep you posted.

    -Warren

    Anonymous commented  · 

    I disagree with this as well, the current design provides a clear separation between private chats and team conversations.

    Chat is a single continuous conversation with an individual and Teams provide a collaborative platform for a group of people where multiple conversations can run in parallel.

    Chat is not a team activity, it's an individual conversation and should never be put under the same tab.

    This forum should have an option to down vote a feature, so that we can get and idea of how many do not agree to a particular idea.

  7. 16 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    2 comments  ·  Public » Planner  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
    Anonymous commented  · 

    This will be a very helpful feature, but rather than just giving percentages it would be better if,
    1. we keep the status as it is (Started/In Progress/Completed)
    2. add a progress bar on the task tile
    3. add weights to Checklist Items in each task

    The progress bar on the tile should display the % based on number of checklist items ticked.

  8. 5,674 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    617 comments  ·  Public » Messaging  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base