John D. Shkolnik

My feedback

  1. 1 vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Public » Notifications  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    John D. Shkolnik shared this idea  · 
  2. 2 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Public » UX/Design  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    John D. Shkolnik supported this idea  · 
  3. 2 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Public » Presence  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    John D. Shkolnik commented  · 

    We have the same problem.

    John D. Shkolnik supported this idea  · 
  4. 55 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    3 comments  ·  Public » Messaging  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    John D. Shkolnik commented  · 

    MilenaN, this is not supported. If you start a new chat with same participants, it will immediately recognize it's an already existing named group chat.

    What we want is for each named chat to be unique with its own history and context.

    John D. Shkolnik supported this idea  · 
  5. 7 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Public » UX/Design  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    John D. Shkolnik supported this idea  · 
  6. 3 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Public » Meetings  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    John D. Shkolnik commented  · 

    A group chat should behave the same as a channel conversation in that it persists context. I can reply to a channel conversation with multiple meetings over time which would stay within that thread. Group chats, on the other hand, break that thread for every single meeting.

    -A group of 5 people have an ongoing chat.
    -A meeting is scheduled.
    -That meeting doesn't have the ongoing chat in history. Instead, it has a brand new chat thread. Worse still, only the people who show up for the meeting get that new chat thread.

    John D. Shkolnik supported this idea  · 
  7. 12 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    2 comments  ·  Public » Meetings  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    John D. Shkolnik supported this idea  · 
  8. 8,952 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    943 comments  ·  Public » UX/Design  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    John D. Shkolnik supported this idea  · 
  9. 235 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    34 comments  ·  Public » Meetings  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    The OWA team has added a “Teams meeting” toggle in the new meeting item, as a preview feature. If you’d like to try it out, please turn on ""the new Outlook" toggle in the upper right corner. We’ll set this to completed once it’s fully released by the OWA team.

    Thanks!

    John D. Shkolnik commented  · 

    I would except turning on "the new Outlook" causes us to lose our URL-based workaround for accessing a team's group calendar (since they're all hidden from Exchange clients by default).

    https://outlook.office365.com/owa/?path=/group/myo365group@service.microsoft.com/calendar

    John D. Shkolnik supported this idea  · 
  10. 10,972 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    894 comments  ·  Public » Teams and Channels  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    We know you are patiently waiting for this feature. This feature is being implemented in stages. Fast tenant switching is currently in testing both internally and with early customers. We expect to release to the public in the Fall. I’ll post an update once it’s rolling out.

    Full multi-tenant, multi-user support will be added after fast tenant switching.

    ~Alex

    John D. Shkolnik supported this idea  · 
  11. 10,470 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1192 comments  ·  Public » UX/Design  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    John D. Shkolnik supported this idea  · 
  12. 10,915 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    953 comments  ·  Public » Calendar  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    John D. Shkolnik supported this idea  · 
  13. 23,085 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1885 comments  ·  Public » Teams and Channels  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    We acknowledge the customer demand for Private Channels and have been hard at work on it. Private Channels is currently in preview with a select group of customers. We expect to release the feature to the public later this Fall, and will update here when we are starting to roll out to all customers. We appreciate all the feedback you have provided to us on this forum and thank you for your patience.

    ~Alex

    John D. Shkolnik supported this idea  · 
  14. 1 vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Public » Bugs  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  15. 43 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    5 comments  ·  Public » Teams and Channels  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    John D. Shkolnik commented  · 

    I would add that follow should continue to work even if the entire team is not a favorite.

    John D. Shkolnik supported this idea  · 
  16. 61 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    John D. Shkolnik supported this idea  · 
  17. 1,071 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    82 comments  ·  Public » Desktop  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    John D. Shkolnik supported this idea  · 
  18. 446 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    91 comments  ·  Public » Messaging  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    under review  ·  Warren responded

    This request is still being considered by the feature team but a final decision has not yet been made. I’m still awaiting more details.

    -Warren

    John D. Shkolnik supported this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base



You are about to visit the UserVoice site for Microsoft Teams

We have partnered with UserVoice, a 3rd party service providing public discussion forums for product-specific feedback.

By clicking "Continue to UserVoice" you agree to UserVoice's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.