Daniel

My feedback

  1. 3,220 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    271 comments  ·  Public » Messaging  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Daniel supported this idea  · 
  2. 19 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Public » Teams and Channels  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Daniel supported this idea  · 
    Daniel commented  · 

    Just like the standard feature in Slack, right? Would love to see youtube videos play in app, even if it has to open into a different window/view like they do for Microsoft Stream videos. Adding this functionality for Stream and not for Youtube (assuming Microsoft has to develop that functionality and not Google for the YouTube app in Teams) will not accelerate Stream adoption since YouTube videos can be made private anyway (a feature of Stream is that videos shared on the corporate channel will only be available to corporate viewers).

  3. 445 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    71 comments  ·  Public » Teams and Channels  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Daniel commented  · 

    This is especially helpful for growing organizations and departments where people start working on a project that gets bigger and bigger until you need a PM, title changes, new team, etc. You could just create a new channel or team when that momentum hits a tipping point, but now you've lost all previous content that may need to be referenced by a PM, department heads, new team members after expansion, etc. Seems silly to have to remember to add each new team member of a project to an old group chat that nobody is supposed to use (confusing, at least) until the old info is no longer relevant or necessary to keep (but when does that happen?). This would be a huge step in managing the extra complexity of having teams with channels instead of just channels like Slack or Hangouts.

    Daniel supported this idea  · 
  4. 2 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Public » Performance  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Daniel supported this idea  · 
  5. 26 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    2 comments  ·  Public » Interoperability  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Daniel supported this idea  · 
  6. 3 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Daniel shared this idea  · 
  7. 129 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    7 comments  ·  Public » Search  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Daniel commented  · 

    Forget the year, it's the age of computers. Why would they limit search functionality to "exact match only"?! Seriously, if a message/reply has "requirements", it will not show in the search results if you search "requirement". Why did they release such a subpar search feature? Oh yeah, "Microsoft". Half-assing every product they've ever released since the company's inception.

    Daniel supported this idea  · 
  8. 7 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    4 comments  ·  Public » Bugs  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Daniel supported this idea  · 
  9. 368 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    92 comments  ·  Public » Teams and Channels  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    declined  ·  Warren responded

    This request has been declined by the feature team.

    Private channels may help with items such as this request once they are released. The Private channel topic is tracked at http://microsoftteams.uservoice.com/forums/555103/suggestions/16911079

    Please note the handling of “Guest Accounts” is a separate ask and can be found at: https://microsoftteams.uservoice.com/forums/555103-public/suggestions/16911109-guest-access

    The request about “Guest Access at the Channel” level is being tracked by this request: https://microsoftteams.uservoice.com/forums/555103-public/suggestions/31374577-guest-access-should-be-implemented-at-the-channel

    Thank you all for the feedback.
    -Warren

    Daniel commented  · 

    This is a bad idea that would alienate more people from teams. Your nostalgia is not worth the ruin and abandonment of this project.

  10. 1,083 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    106 comments  ·  Public » Files  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    working on it  ·  Warren responded

    This feature request is still in the works. No additional updates are available at this time. I’ll keep you posted as I hear more.

    -Warren

    Daniel supported this idea  · 
  11. 754 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    141 comments  ·  Public » Messaging  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Daniel commented  · 

    A workaround for copying from out of and pasting into Teams exists. Paste into Word or Excel, re-copy from there, then paste into Teams.

  12. 656 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Daniel supported this idea  · 
  13. 1,377 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    185 comments  ·  Public » Teams and Channels  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Daniel supported this idea  · 
  14. 922 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    176 comments  ·  Public » Teams and Channels  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    needs your feedback  ·  Suphatra responded

    Hi folks, we are collecting feedback on this so we can determine prioritization and user need.

    Please comment in the thread below about how this affects you, how you currently add members, and who you think would benefit from this in your organization.

    Thank you!

    Daniel supported this idea  · 
  15. 1,447 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    193 comments  ·  Public » Messaging  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    The ability to remove a user from group chats (including meeting chats) is now available on desktop, and coming soon to mobile.

    How it works: A user can go to any group chat of 3 or more people and navigate to the roster and by hovering over any user you will see the “X”. Clicking on this will show a confirmation dialog. Then the user must select remove to remove the user. 

    What does everyone see: Everyone in the chat will see the control message that says “User A removed User B from the chat”. 

    What does the removed user see: The removed user will still have access to the chat history but will no longer see new messages after the point of removal and will not be able to compose messages or make any changes to the chat.

    Note: This setting is controlled by your tenant admin, so may or may not…

    Daniel supported this idea  · 
  16. 2,266 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    296 comments  ·  Public » Files  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    working on it  ·  Warren responded

    This feature request is now actively being worked upon. As we move through the development process, I will post an new updates to this topic.

    Please keep the votes and feedback coming in. Your feedback is shared with the feature team every month.

    -Warren

    Daniel supported this idea  · 
  17. 544 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    90 comments  ·  Public » Messaging  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    declined  ·  Suphatra responded

    We’re fixing bugs identified in the comments, and other user reports we’ve received around markdown, but we’ve decided we’re not going to fundamentally change our markdown support.

    This is the first time we’ve declined a request, and it didn’t come easily. We weighed this against other important features we’re working on to deliver and we had to make some tough choices.

    Really appreciate your understanding on this, and please feel free to ping me if you have any questions, complaints, or need to rant.

    Suphatra

    Daniel supported this idea  · 
  18. 991 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    272 comments  ·  Public » Messaging  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    declined  ·  Suphatra responded

    Hi everyone, thanks so much for this request.

    We have thought this through and decided to prioritize other user-requested items, so this one has been declined. But please don’t stop telling us what you want, because we’re still working to get many of those done. We’re listening and appreciate your support and patience.

    Suphatra

    Daniel supported this idea  · 
  19. 2,212 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    343 comments  ·  Public » Teams and Channels  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Daniel supported this idea  · 
  20. 1,074 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    declined  ·  148 comments  ·  Public » UX/Design  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Daniel supported this idea  · 
← Previous 1

Feedback and Knowledge Base



You are about to visit the UserVoice site for Microsoft Teams

We have partnered with UserVoice, a 3rd party service providing public discussion forums for product-specific feedback.

By clicking "Continue to UserVoice" you agree to UserVoice's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.