Daniel

My feedback

  1. 21,238 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1655 comments  ·  Public » Teams and Channels  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    As stated in the last update, the ability to use multiple Teams accounts at the same time is being implemented in stages for Desktop. Faster tenant switching functionality on the Windows client has been rolled out to the public ring fully, and Mac will begin rolling out soon. Work is in progress on cross-tenant notification improvements, and support for multiple accounts on desktop will follow. We’ll keep you posted!

    Note: The ability to use multiple Teams accounts at the same time is supported on iOS & Android today.

    Thanks,
    Alex & the Teams team

    Edited

    Daniel supported this idea  · 
  2. 6,220 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    555 comments  ·  Public » Messaging  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Daniel supported this idea  · 
  3. 23 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Public » Teams and Channels  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Daniel supported this idea  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Daniel commented  · 

    Just like the standard feature in Slack, right? Would love to see youtube videos play in app, even if it has to open into a different window/view like they do for Microsoft Stream videos. Adding this functionality for Stream and not for Youtube (assuming Microsoft has to develop that functionality and not Google for the YouTube app in Teams) will not accelerate Stream adoption since YouTube videos can be made private anyway (a feature of Stream is that videos shared on the corporate channel will only be available to corporate viewers).

  4. 1,148 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    168 comments  ·  Public » Messaging  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Daniel commented  · 

    This is especially helpful for growing organizations and departments where people start working on a project that gets bigger and bigger until you need a PM, title changes, new team, etc. You could just create a new channel or team when that momentum hits a tipping point, but now you've lost all previous content that may need to be referenced by a PM, department heads, new team members after expansion, etc. Seems silly to have to remember to add each new team member of a project to an old group chat that nobody is supposed to use (confusing, at least) until the old info is no longer relevant or necessary to keep (but when does that happen?). This would be a huge step in managing the extra complexity of having teams with channels instead of just channels like Slack or Hangouts.

    Daniel supported this idea  · 
  5. 3 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Public » Performance  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Daniel supported this idea  · 
  6. 74 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    5 comments  ·  Public » Interoperability  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Daniel supported this idea  · 
  7. 15 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Daniel shared this idea  · 
  8. 461 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    33 comments  ·  Public » Search  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Daniel commented  · 

    Forget the year, it's the age of computers. Why would they limit search functionality to "exact match only"?! Seriously, if a message/reply has "requirements", it will not show in the search results if you search "requirement". Why did they release such a subpar search feature? Oh yeah, "Microsoft". Half-assing every product they've ever released since the company's inception.

    Daniel supported this idea  · 
  9. 8 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    5 comments  ·  Public » Bugs  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Daniel supported this idea  · 
  10. 2,314 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    182 comments  ·  Public » Files  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    working on it  ·  Warren responded

    This feature request is still in the works. No additional updates are available at this time. I’ll keep you posted as I hear more.

    -Warren

    Daniel supported this idea  · 
  11. 881 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    157 comments  ·  Public » Messaging  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Daniel commented  · 

    A workaround for copying from out of and pasting into Teams exists. Paste into Word or Excel, re-copy from there, then paste into Teams.

  12. 1,015 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Daniel supported this idea  · 
  13. 2,882 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    370 comments  ·  Public » Teams and Channels  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Daniel supported this idea  · 
  14. 1,708 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    361 comments  ·  Public » Teams and Channels  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    needs your feedback  ·  Suphatra responded

    Hi folks, we are collecting feedback on this so we can determine prioritization and user need.

    Please comment in the thread below about how this affects you, how you currently add members, and who you think would benefit from this in your organization.

    Thank you!

    Daniel supported this idea  · 
  15. 5,132 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    678 comments  ·  Public » Files  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Daniel supported this idea  · 
  16. 3,733 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    458 comments  ·  Public » Teams and Channels  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Daniel supported this idea  · 
  17. 2,145 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    229 comments  ·  Public » UX/Design  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Daniel supported this idea  · 
  18. 7,593 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    652 comments  ·  Public » Messaging  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Daniel supported this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base