Tim

My feedback

  1. 3 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Public » Teams and Channels  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Tim supported this idea  · 
  2. 219 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    14 comments  ·  Public » Getting Started  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Tim supported this idea  · 
  3. 905 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    186 comments  ·  Public » Teams and Channels  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    partially done  ·  Warren responded

    As mentioned in the prior status, the channel limit was raised from 100 to 200.

    In the near future a retention limit will be set so you can still go back and reinstate a channel you had deleted. Once the retention period has expired then the channel will get a hard delete which will free up the space and no longer count toward the 200 channel limit.

    This will help with some of the issues you have voiced in the comments below.
    But I understand many of you wish the limit to be further increased. I will continue to provide your votes and comments to the feature team.

    -Warren

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Tim commented  · 

    Microsoft, users will use channels like Folders.... you need to increase the Channel limit to whatever the SharePoint list limit is.

    Tim supported this idea  · 
  4. 827 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    111 comments  ·  Public » Planner  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Tim supported this idea  · 
  5. 1,715 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    142 comments  ·  Public » Meetings  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Tim supported this idea  · 
  6. 192 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    27 comments  ·  Public » Meetings  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Tim supported this idea  · 
  7. 486 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    85 comments  ·  Public » Meetings  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Tim supported this idea  · 
  8. 281 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    21 comments  ·  Public » Meetings  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Tim supported this idea  · 
  9. 3,408 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    405 comments  ·  Public » Meetings  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Tim supported this idea  · 
  10. 2,982 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    679 comments  ·  Public » Meetings  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Thank you for your feedback. We’re happy to announce that Mac support for sharing system audio is now available to users who have opted into Public Preview.

    Please see feature details here: https://techcommunity.microsoft.com/t5/microsoft-teams-public-preview/now-in-public-preview-channel-include-computer-sound-on-mac/m-p/2107853.

    You can learn more about the new Microsoft Teams Public Preview program here: https://aka.ms/TeamsPublicPreview, and Teams administrators can find documentation to manage which users will see the Public Preview option here: https://aka.ms/TeamsPublicPreviewAdmin

    Enjoy!

    Tim supported this idea  · 
  11. 6,694 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    521 comments  ·  Public » Meetings  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Tim supported this idea  · 
  12. 105 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    8 comments  ·  Public » Calling  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Tim supported this idea  · 
  13. 4 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Public » Teams and Channels  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Tim supported this idea  · 
  14. 70 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    9 comments  ·  Public » Meetings  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Tim supported this idea  · 
  15. 3 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Public » Calling  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Tim supported this idea  · 
  16. 7 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    6 comments  ·  Public » Meetings  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Tim supported this idea  · 
  17. 14,921 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    876 comments  ·  Public » Teams and Channels  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Tim supported this idea  · 
  18. 15,558 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1926 comments  ·  Public » Emojis and GIFs  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Thank you for your feedback! We are excited to announce that an expanded set of emojis are included in our May 2021 Public Preview pack and will be available to users who opt into Public Preview. This update includes over 800 new emojis, along with skintone options, different genders for applicable emojis and new emojis featuring people with disabilities.

    Please see feature details here: Now in public preview: https://techcommunity.microsoft.com/t5/microsoft-teams-public-preview/now-in-public-preview-expanded-emoji-picker/m-p/2282145

    You can learn more about the new Microsoft Teams Public Preview program here: https://aka.ms/TeamsPublicPreview, and Teams administrators can find documentation to manage which users will see the Public Preview option here: https://aka.ms/TeamsPublicPreviewAdmin

    Tim supported this idea  · 
  19. 11,209 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    920 comments  ·  Public » Teams and Channels  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    if you have an existing post that you want to show in a different channel, you can edit the message and cross-post. This will add the top-level post to the different channel, but will not include the full set of replies. We will keep this request in mind as we evolve the cross-posting feature in the future and update if the status changes.

    Details on cross posting can be found here: https://support.office.com/article/cross-post-a-channel-conversation-in-teams-9c1252a3-67ef-498e-a7c1-dd7147b3d295.

    Tim supported this idea  · 
  20. 409 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    77 comments  ·  Public » Meetings  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    There are two parts to this topic:

    1) Completed: Bypass the lobby for PSTN: The ability for admins and organizers to be able to specify a meeting option to bypass the PSTN lobby independently of the VoIP lobby.

    2) On the backlog: Ability for an organizer joined via PSTN to admit users from the lobby with a PIN. If you enable “Always let callers bypass the lobby” in your meeting options, people calling in by phone will join your meeting without having to wait for someone to admit them. See details here: https://support.microsoft.com/office/change-participant-settings-for-a-teams-meeting-53261366-dbd5-45f9-aae9-a70e6354f88e

    Please Note: In Q2CY20, we launched a new default in for the Teams meeting policy (https://www.microsoft.com/microsoft-365/roadmap?filters=&searchterms=63388). If tenants have not modified their default meeting policy, lobby is now enforced.

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Tim commented  · 

    Microsoft please fix this as soon as possible. Not every meeting is attended via PC or Teams application. Hosts need to be able to start a meeting and admit all participants after they enter their PIN.

    Echoing David's post:

    "

    In Skype, we have the following scenario:
    - Participants call the conference number and are waiting in a lobby room for the organizer
    - The organizer calls the conference, enters his leader PIN.
    - The conference starts and participants that were waiting in the lobby room are admitted into the conference.

    In Teams, unfortunately, it's a bit different:
    - Participants call the conference number and are waiting in a lobby room for he organizer
    - The organizer calls the conference, enters his leader PIN.
    - The conference starts BUT participants that were waiting in the lobby room are NOT admitted into the conference.
    - The organizer needs to openTeams app (web, mobile, desktop) and to admit people from the lobby room.

    In main situations, it's OK but in some situations (especially top management meetings) they don't need Teams app. Thus, this process is quite cumbersome and not intuitive, and some meetings were actually cancelled because people thought it was a bug of Teams meeting.

    Solution is to have the same way of working than Skype: the conference starts when the organizer enters his leader PIN AND waiting participants are automatically admitted within the conference afterwards.

    Please let me know if it's the direction Microsoft will follow.

    Thanks,
    David"

    Tim supported this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base