Dominik Dünnebacke

My feedback

  1. 88 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    6 comments  ·  Public » People  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Dominik Dünnebacke supported this idea  · 
  2. 121 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    17 comments  ·  Public » IT Pro - Controls and Knobs  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Dominik Dünnebacke supported this idea  · 
  3. 187 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    29 comments  ·  Public » Meetings  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Dominik Dünnebacke supported this idea  · 
  4. 8,952 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    943 comments  ·  Public » UX/Design  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Dominik Dünnebacke supported this idea  · 
  5. 768 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    97 comments  ·  Public » Meetings  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Dominik Dünnebacke supported this idea  · 
  6. 352 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    48 comments  ·  Public » Notifications  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    working on it  ·  Warren responded

    This is still being worked upon and making good progress! Stay tuned for additional updates.

    -Warren

    Dominik Dünnebacke commented  · 

    The feature is also available in our tenant. Tested successfully on Chrome and Edge. Thanks for the implementation!

    One suggestion though: When a notifications is received the browsers task bar icon should blink (currently not the case). Otherwise a user might miss a new message if he is not present when the notification was received.

    Dominik Dünnebacke commented  · 

    We ended up creating an extension for Google Chrome that is based on this user script: https://github.com/Dellos7/ms-teams-notifications-tampermonkey

    It doesn't do rich notifications but at least the user knows that there are a new notification that require attention. Get's us in a state where we can finally roll out Teams. Hope Microsoft gets this fixed soon though including rich notifications. Creating this extension took us roughly one day.

    Dominik Dünnebacke commented  · 

    Currently the Teams app is not compatible with non-persistent-VDI environments, such as Citrix and RDS. There is already a feature request to fix that: https://microsoftteams.uservoice.com/forums/555103-public/suggestions/18882088-non-persistent-vdi

    In that scenario using the web app is a great option but the lack of notifications makes it hard to get the backing of the users and thus the management. Also on Linux notifications would be a great enhancement.

    The lack of this feature is currently preventing us from rolling out in a 1000 user environment.

    Dominik Dünnebacke supported this idea  · 
  7. 8,890 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1144 comments  ·  Public » Linux  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Dominik Dünnebacke commented  · 

    This is sad news as the majority of our clients is Linux and we might need to reconsider Teams as collab solution.

    I think this is a political decision as Linux clients will not generate revenue for Microsoft . One goal behind Office 365 / Microsoft 365 is to encourage the usage of Microsoft platforms including Windows. Yes, they do support macOS as well, but enterprises will in most cases go for the Windows platform due to cost and compatibility. Teams not being available on Linux adds to this compatibility theory.

    Dominik Dünnebacke supported this idea  · 
  8. 215 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    33 comments  ·  Public » Meetings  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Dominik Dünnebacke supported this idea  · 
  9. 820 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    151 comments  ·  Public » Teams and Channels  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    needs your feedback  ·  Suphatra responded

    Hi folks, we are collecting feedback on this so we can determine prioritization and user need.

    Please comment in the thread below about how this affects you, how you currently add members, and who you think would benefit from this in your organization.

    Thank you!

    Dominik Dünnebacke supported this idea  · 
  10. 3 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Public » Bugs  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Dominik Dünnebacke shared this idea  · 
  11. 37 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    10 comments  ·  Public » Calling  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Dominik Dünnebacke supported this idea  · 
    Dominik Dünnebacke commented  · 

    If you set the TeamsUpgradePolicy to "TeamsOnly" for a specific user or for the whole tenant, PSTN calls will be received in Teams. But that also strips the Skype for Business client from any functionality except for joining SfB meetings. We need an additional TeamsUpgradePolicy with value "Islands" that receives PSTN calls in Teams and leaves full functionality to the SfB client (except for PSTN calling).

    Business case: Many external parties still use SfB as their primary and only platform. For users who communicate with these parties we need full functionality in Skype for Business (initiate SfB calls, initiate chats, etc). Still we want these users to only use SfB when necessary. All other tasks should be facilitated in Teams (like receiving PSTN calls).

  12. 3 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Public » Mobile  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Dominik Dünnebacke shared this idea  · 
  13. 11 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    2 comments  ·  Public » Interoperability  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Dominik Dünnebacke commented  · 

    I found an undocumented solution to the issue. The URL format must be as follows to allow Seamless SSO:
    https://teams.microsoft.com?domain_hint=tenant.onmicrosoft.com
    Replace "tenant" with your own realm.

    Dominik Dünnebacke shared this idea  · 
  14. 7 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Dominik Dünnebacke shared this idea  · 
  15. 16 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Public » Guest Access  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Dominik Dünnebacke shared this idea  · 
  16. 45 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    3 comments  ·  Public » Teams and Channels  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Dominik Dünnebacke supported this idea  · 
  17. 4 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Public » Files  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Dominik Dünnebacke shared this idea  · 
  18. 29 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Public » Linux  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Dominik Dünnebacke supported this idea  · 
  19. 17 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    4 comments  ·  Public » Meetings  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Dominik Dünnebacke supported this idea  · 
  20. 880 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    72 comments  ·  Public » Meetings  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Dominik Dünnebacke supported this idea  · 
    Dominik Dünnebacke commented  · 

    Currently the functionality "Desktop sharing" is only available in the app version of Teams but not in the web version. The button to share the screen is available but grayed out. When hovering over the button, it says "Desktop sharing isn't supported in your browser yet".

    In scenarios where deploying the app is not favorable (e.g. VDI, Linux), screen sharing from within the web app would be highly useful.

    Tested on Google Chrome Version 66.0.3359.139 (Official Build) (64-bit)

← Previous 1

Feedback and Knowledge Base



You are about to visit the UserVoice site for Microsoft Teams

We have partnered with UserVoice, a 3rd party service providing public discussion forums for product-specific feedback.

By clicking "Continue to UserVoice" you agree to UserVoice's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.