Dominik Dünnebacke

My feedback

  1. 772 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    154 comments  ·  Public » People  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Dominik Dünnebacke supported this idea  · 
  2. 585 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    82 comments  ·  Public » IT Pro  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Dominik Dünnebacke supported this idea  · 
  3. 1,943 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    221 comments  ·  Public » Meetings  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Dominik Dünnebacke supported this idea  · 
  4. 382 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    51 comments  ·  Public » Notifications  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    working on it  ·  Warren responded

    This is still being worked upon and making good progress! Stay tuned for additional updates.

    -Warren

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Dominik Dünnebacke commented  · 

    The feature is also available in our tenant. Tested successfully on Chrome and Edge. Thanks for the implementation!

    One suggestion though: When a notifications is received the browsers task bar icon should blink (currently not the case). Otherwise a user might miss a new message if he is not present when the notification was received.

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Dominik Dünnebacke commented  · 

    We ended up creating an extension for Google Chrome that is based on this user script: https://github.com/Dellos7/ms-teams-notifications-tampermonkey

    It doesn't do rich notifications but at least the user knows that there are a new notification that require attention. Get's us in a state where we can finally roll out Teams. Hope Microsoft gets this fixed soon though including rich notifications. Creating this extension took us roughly one day.

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Dominik Dünnebacke commented  · 

    Currently the Teams app is not compatible with non-persistent-VDI environments, such as Citrix and RDS. There is already a feature request to fix that: https://microsoftteams.uservoice.com/forums/555103-public/suggestions/18882088-non-persistent-vdi

    In that scenario using the web app is a great option but the lack of notifications makes it hard to get the backing of the users and thus the management. Also on Linux notifications would be a great enhancement.

    The lack of this feature is currently preventing us from rolling out in a 1000 user environment.

    Dominik Dünnebacke supported this idea  · 
  5. 433 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    65 comments  ·  Public » Meetings  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Dominik Dünnebacke supported this idea  · 
  6. 2,206 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    440 comments  ·  Public » Teams and Channels  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Dominik Dünnebacke supported this idea  · 
  7. 7 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Public » Bugs  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Dominik Dünnebacke shared this idea  · 
  8. 44 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    10 comments  ·  Public » Calling  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Dominik Dünnebacke supported this idea  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Dominik Dünnebacke commented  · 

    If you set the TeamsUpgradePolicy to "TeamsOnly" for a specific user or for the whole tenant, PSTN calls will be received in Teams. But that also strips the Skype for Business client from any functionality except for joining SfB meetings. We need an additional TeamsUpgradePolicy with value "Islands" that receives PSTN calls in Teams and leaves full functionality to the SfB client (except for PSTN calling).

    Business case: Many external parties still use SfB as their primary and only platform. For users who communicate with these parties we need full functionality in Skype for Business (initiate SfB calls, initiate chats, etc). Still we want these users to only use SfB when necessary. All other tasks should be facilitated in Teams (like receiving PSTN calls).

  9. 4 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Public » Mobile  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Dominik Dünnebacke shared this idea  · 
  10. 23 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    2 comments  ·  Public » Interoperability  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Dominik Dünnebacke commented  · 

    I found an undocumented solution to the issue. The URL format must be as follows to allow Seamless SSO:
    https://teams.microsoft.com?domain_hint=tenant.onmicrosoft.com
    Replace "tenant" with your own realm.

    Dominik Dünnebacke shared this idea  · 
  11. 6 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Dominik Dünnebacke shared this idea  · 
  12. 36 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    3 comments  ·  Public » Guest Access  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Dominik Dünnebacke shared this idea  · 
  13. 96 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    9 comments  ·  Public » Teams and Channels  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Dominik Dünnebacke supported this idea  · 
  14. 14 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Public » Files  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Dominik Dünnebacke shared this idea  · 
  15. 41 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    2 comments  ·  Public » Linux  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Dominik Dünnebacke supported this idea  · 
  16. 28 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    5 comments  ·  Public » Meetings  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Dominik Dünnebacke supported this idea  · 
  17. 1,624 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    139 comments  ·  Public » Meetings  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Dominik Dünnebacke supported this idea  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Dominik Dünnebacke commented  · 

    Currently the functionality "Desktop sharing" is only available in the app version of Teams but not in the web version. The button to share the screen is available but grayed out. When hovering over the button, it says "Desktop sharing isn't supported in your browser yet".

    In scenarios where deploying the app is not favorable (e.g. VDI, Linux), screen sharing from within the web app would be highly useful.

    Tested on Google Chrome Version 66.0.3359.139 (Official Build) (64-bit)

  18. 539 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    under review  ·  82 comments  ·  Public » Notifications  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Dominik Dünnebacke supported this idea  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Dominik Dünnebacke commented  · 

    Agreed. Some platforms do not support the Desktop app as of now (e.g. VDI environments such as RDS or Citrix) and using the web app is the only option to deploy the software. The download banner causes confusion.

    Perhaps you could implement an option in the admin panel to disable the advertisement of the Desktop (and mobile) app.

  19. 244 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    27 comments  ·  Public » Notifications  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Dominik Dünnebacke commented  · 

    Kudos for this recommendation. I’d like to be able to switch to some sort of “Do not disturb” mode in non-business hours and weekends or even better, put in a schedule for that.

Feedback and Knowledge Base