Robert

My feedback

  1. 25,548 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    3121 comments  ·  Public » Teams and Channels  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Robert supported this idea  · 
  2. 9,995 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    842 comments  ·  Public » Teams and Channels  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    if you have an existing post that you want to show in a different channel, you can edit the message and cross-post. This will add the top-level post to the different channel, but will not include the full set of replies. We will keep this request in mind as we evolve the cross-posting feature in the future and update if the status changes.

    Details on cross posting can be found here: https://support.office.com/article/cross-post-a-channel-conversation-in-teams-9c1252a3-67ef-498e-a7c1-dd7147b3d295.

    Robert supported this idea  · 
  3. 1,431 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Robert supported this idea  · 
  4. 1,935 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    273 comments  ·  Public » Messaging  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Robert supported this idea  · 
  5. 11 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Public » Messaging  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Robert commented  · 

    What I don't understand is why they didn't add in the same functionality that already exists for static images. It makes it way less useful when the user has to either right-click or go to files tab and open it in a web browser (that usually requires you to log in).

    Robert supported this idea  · 
  6. 15 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    3 comments  ·  Public » Messaging  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Robert supported this idea  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Robert commented  · 

    What I don't understand is why they didn't add in the same functionality that already exists for static images where clicking the image expands it in a larger dialog. It makes it way less useful when the user has to either right-click or go to files tab and open it in a web browser (that usually requires you to log in).

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Robert commented  · 

    I don't understand how animated gifs don't get the functionality as the static images do where when you click on it, it expands larger. You can't even really use it as they are thumnail sized. Not very useful when users have to either right-click or visit the files tab to only then open it in a browser window which then you'll need to log in.

  7. 1,323 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    146 comments  ·  Public » Messaging  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Robert supported this idea  · 
  8. 18,246 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1670 comments  ·  Public » UX/Design  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Robert commented  · 

    Yes! Yes! Yes! WAY too much wasted space. Please update that soon. At the very least give the option to switch to current view or expanded view. Please and thank you!

    Robert supported this idea  · 
  9. 36 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    4 comments  ·  Public » Calling  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Robert commented  · 

    I agree, the incoming call notification should stay on top since you could very easily be clicking away at the same moment the incoming popup pops up and you loose the dialog behind windows.

  10. 2,849 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    294 comments  ·  Public » Notifications  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Once support for Windows 10 native notifications is released, users who choose to use Windows notifications will be able to utilize Windows OS specific settings for the length of time to display notifications. Mac does not have an OS specific setting, so will not have the support.

    Robert supported this idea  · 
  11. 28 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    3 comments  ·  Public » UX/Design  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Robert supported this idea  · 
  12. 29 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Public » UX/Design  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Robert supported this idea  · 
  13. 1,826 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    160 comments  ·  Public » Teams and Channels  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    on the backlog  ·  Warren responded

    This feature request is still working its way through the backlog queue.

    -Warren

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Robert commented  · 

    The only way I see to assign members to a Team is either using their individual account or a AD distribution list which only breaks out the individual users into that Team. This is a maintenance nightmare to manage Teams when users are added or removed from an AD group. What is the time table for adding the ability for Team members to tied to a AD group?

    Robert supported this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base