Nathan Berger
My feedback
-
29 votesNathan Berger
supported this idea
·
-
74 votesNathan Berger
supported this idea
·
-
2,331 votes
This feature request is working its way through the backlog queue. No new details are available yet.
-Warren
Nathan Berger
commented
Just a gentle reminder that some of this is already possible: https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/sharepoint/dev/transform/modernize-connect-to-office365-group
Along with this, some members are saying below that there's a link on the root of a SharePoint site collection that can do this as well.
Nathan Berger
commented
This is currently possible. You have to create an O365 group on a SharePoint site: https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/sharepoint/dev/transform/modernize-connect-to-office365-group
Then just create the Team on the O365 group and you're all good to go.
I have no idea why this is still up here.
-
26 votesNathan Berger
commented
We have lots of awkward screen-sharing moments when messages come up and our presenters have to be quick to dismiss it.
Nathan Berger
commented
I thought this was solved a while ago, but it turns out the other "Quiet Hours" suggestion was just about the mobile app. This is a pretty important feature that we don't have yet.
Nathan Berger
supported this idea
·
-
2,213 votes
This feature is still in the planning stage. No new updates are available at this time.
-Warren
Nathan Berger
supported this idea
·
-
1,507 votes
This feature is still being reviewed by the feature team. No decision has been made yet. I’ll keep you posted.
-Warren
Nathan Berger
commented
to Andy Merskin below - there are other feature requests (such as pop-out windows) that would better address using both at once.
Nathan Berger
commented
Disagree with this... team work should be separate. Chat replaces Skype for Business for one-on-one. This may seem like a good idea now, but once SfB is gone, this will be a problem.
Thanks.
-
114 votesNathan Berger
commented
The information on this suggestion is now outdated. "Islands" and "Sfb Only" are the only available upgrade configurations at the moment.
If I recall correctly, the update got pushed out for a Coexistence setting, but was not kept due to an error that occurred. Coexistence is supposed to be here soon, based on MS documentation from July.
-
109 votesNathan Berger
commented
This is an infuriating bug. There needs to be a manual "check-in" option that closes all open sessions on the file and allows you to open it.
Nathan Berger
supported this idea
·
-
224 votes
This item is still in the backlog. No further details are available at this time.
-Warren
Nathan Berger
commented
This is already in the roadmap: https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-365/blog/2018/03/12/microsoft-teams-turns-1-advances-vision-for-intelligent-communications/
Specifically: "Cloud recording—Will provide one-click meeting recordings with automatic transcription and timecoding, enabling all team members the ability to read captions, search within the conversation, and playback all or part of the meeting. In the future, it will also include facial recognition, so remarks can be attributed to specific meeting attendees."Nathan Berger
supported this idea
·
-
2,824 votes
This feature request is still on in the backlog. No new updates available at this time.
-Warren
Nathan Berger
supported this idea
·
-
2,174 votes89 comments · Public » Apps, Connectors, Messaging Extensions · Flag idea as inappropriate… · Admin →
This feature request is still being actively worked upon. Good progress is being made, but I cannot share any additional details at this time.
While we work on our Whiteboard you can also try the third party whiteboard app Freehand by Invision that can be found by clicking the Store icon from within Teams and go to the app gallery.
Thank you for all the feedback and suggestions.
-WarrenNathan Berger
commented
Nice! Any word on whether this will integrate with the existing Whiteboard preview app?
Nathan Berger
supported this idea
·
-
6,404 votes
Hi everyone! I’m happy to share that we’ve been working on this and are at a point where we need your feedback.
We have designs for this multi-tenant feature and are collecting feedback this week. If you are interested in weighing in on this, keep reading…
If you would be interested in participating please contact the user researcher and generally fabulous coworker of mine, David Quiroz (his email is daquiroz@microsoft.com). He will schedule you into a time slot and will be the person to conduct the interview. It would only require 30min of your time and would require signing and NDA.
We are looking for five people to participate in a 1:1 session with the researcher. We need people who currently use Teams with multiple tenants/different companies (at least two).
Thank you in advance for your help!
Suphatra
Nathan Berger
supported this idea
·
-
15,770 votes
Hey Microsoft Teams users — I want you to weigh in on new features around channels and group chats. The engineering team and I have put together this survey to find out how you want to see channels improve. You can fill it out here: https://microsoft.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV_esTxHdABLQxKLvn
And I’m still waiting on approval to get you a good update about Private Channels. I can say that we ARE working on it, fervently.
Thanks and ping me any time, for anything at all: www.twitter.com/skprufo or sparavi@microsoft.com. I’m a little behind on email but catching up, so apologies for delays there!
Suphatra
Nathan Berger
commented
Patience is key :) Thanks Warren!
Nathan Berger
commented
Any update on this? It's one of the major roadblocks for implementing Teams within our organization.
Nathan Berger
supported this idea
·
-
4,647 votesNathan Berger
commented
Nice! Good to hear. Thanks for the update.
Nathan Berger
supported this idea
·
-
2,515 votes
Sorry for the delay on an update on this one! I’m hunting down the status for you and will update once I have it.
Also, if you are interested in participating in testing or surveys for this, just tweet me at @skprufo.
Suphatra
Nathan Berger
supported this idea
·
-
1,917 votes
Hate to be the bearer of bad news. This item has been declined. There will be no work to hide or remove the reply button.
As many people have commented, a big ask is to help improve how people distinguish between giving a reply and starting a new message.
For that the focus will be on this item. “Better visual delineation between `Reply` and `Start a new conversation`”
http://microsoftteams.uservoice.com/forums/555103/suggestions/19224826Nathan Berger
supported this idea
·
-
7,897 votes
I’m so happy to share an update with you! The feature team has let me know that they are working hard at this and are aiming for a spring time release.
Please comment below if you might be interested in testing or TAP, and include the industry, company size, and location of your org. We would likely want to hit a very wide range of demographics.
Thanks,
SuphatraNathan Berger
supported this idea
·
-
1,120 votes
This request is still being reviewed by the feature team. No decision has yet been made.
-Warren
Nathan Berger
commented
You know, typically it's good practice to explain why a suggestion was declined :) Especially because 218 people just received an email saying their feature request was declined for no reason, and will all be redirected to this page...
Nathan Berger
supported this idea
·
This would be really helpful, as it would (semi) allow a user to get a Teams notification from a flow. Really looking for a better way to do this, but still could be useful.