SjoerdV

My feedback

  1. 156 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    35 comments  ·  Public » Files  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    SjoerdV commented  · 

    this is a real usability issue, would be nice to at least have the possibility to 'unlink' a file from a chat (without messing with permissions, even)

    SjoerdV supported this idea  · 
  2. 1,216 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    167 comments  ·  Public » Desktop  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    working on it  ·  Suphatra responded

    Hi everyone, the engineer working on this item has left the company and we’re working on replacing him. I wanted to give you that heads up because the work has paused, which extends our shipping date.

    I really appreciate your patience as we work to get this back to actively worked on.

    Suphatra

    SjoerdV supported this idea  · 
    SjoerdV commented  · 

    Please have it autodetect the language we are using and not default to the Language setting in Teams. Multi-lingual is key here!

  3. 5,724 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    408 comments  ·  Public » Teams and Channels  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    working on it  ·  Suphatra responded

    Thanks for following our suggestion to vote this up on SharePoint. It worked! SharePoint has confirmed that they have already started working on this and I’ll be getting an ETA from them after the holidays. -Suphatra

    SjoerdV commented  · 

    Could we have an ETA @suphatra? The mess this bug/oversight creates is getting critical.

    SjoerdV commented  · 

    This has already created such a mess, that by default we do not allow any team members to create channels, limiting the business to help itself and reducing agility... 2.5 years later and still no solution. I would be happy with just a backend solution so we can just synchronize the names on demand through management shell or something. MS please give some urgency here.

    SjoerdV commented  · 

    ETA please!

    SjoerdV commented  · 

    Need a fix soon, please! Renaming channels is a constant and not having the SharePoint folder renamed really complicates things.

    SjoerdV supported this idea  · 
  4. 87 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    33 comments  ·  Public » Guest Access  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    needs your feedback  ·  Warren responded

    If anyone is still hitting this issue, please respond in the comments section of this topic and let me know!

    Thanks!
    -Warren

    SjoerdV commented  · 

    still a problem indeed! please fix it by adding the tenantid parameter in the original invitation email, this way we can just say to Guest Users (or their managers): "please use the original link in the original invitation email to get into Teams in the right tenant". And treating all types of Guest Users (OTP, MSA, ext-AAD) as OTP accounts would be a step in the right direction, this way there would only be one way of managing all these type of accounts, and if you want to use licenses cross-tenant (ext-AAD), make it in such a way that this is only being done on the back-end, we do not want to bore end-users with license errors, do we ;-)

    SjoerdV supported this idea  · 
  5. 654 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    89 comments  ·  Public » Files  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    SjoerdV supported this idea  · 
  6. 7 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    5 comments  ·  Public » Mobile  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    SjoerdV commented  · 

    Where is it?

    SjoerdV supported this idea  · 
  7. 4 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Public » Apps, Connectors, Messaging Extensions  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    SjoerdV supported this idea  · 
  8. 18 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    2 comments  ·  Public » Teams and Channels  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    SjoerdV commented  · 

    Man oh man, oh man... Why does MS insist on limits which are totally unpractical... A quick increase is needed here! First to 200, later on to a 1000 and then no limit at all please.

    SjoerdV supported this idea  · 
  9. 11 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    2 comments  ·  Public » Teams and Channels  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    SjoerdV supported this idea  · 
  10. 481 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    118 comments  ·  Public » Teams and Channels  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    partially done  ·  Warren responded

    As mentioned in the prior status, the channel limit was raised from 100 to 200.

    In the near future a retention limit will be set so you can still go back and reinstate a channel you had deleted. Once the retention period has expired then the channel will get a hard delete which will free up the space and no longer count toward the 200 channel limit.

    This will help with some of the issues you have voiced in the comments below.
    But I understand many of you wish the limit to be further increased. I will continue to provide your votes and comments to the feature team.

    -Warren

    SjoerdV supported this idea  · 
    SjoerdV commented  · 

    and please have the private channel limit 'on par' with the total number of channels. 30.... really?

  11. 4,165 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    442 comments  ·  Public » Messaging  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    SjoerdV commented  · 

    While you have been 'iterating' we have been 'irritating' ourselves that new threads constantly pop up and someone has to clean up the mess... Forum-like functionality has been around for ages and work like a charm everywhere (in fact Yammer does this right...), but Teams achieves to mess this up big time. Please fix this ASAP, we do not need 'new and innovative' we need 'something that works'.

    SjoerdV commented  · 

    just copy the system from Yammer and all is fine ;-)

    SjoerdV supported this idea  · 
  12. 18 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    2 comments  ·  Public » Getting Started  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    SjoerdV supported this idea  · 
  13. 15 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    3 comments  ·  Public » Mobile  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    SjoerdV supported this idea  · 
    SjoerdV commented  · 

    Agreed, this is a needed feature. On iOS (might also be on Android) it is now not possible, with reasonable effort, to select an existing file and add it to the conversation of a channel as a link.

  14. 59 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    13 comments  ·  Public » Guest Access  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    SjoerdV supported this idea  · 
  15. 22 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Public » Files  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    SjoerdV supported this idea  · 
  16. 738 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    102 comments  ·  Public » Messaging  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    SjoerdV supported this idea  · 
  17. 2,264 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    352 comments  ·  Public » Messaging  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    under review  ·  Warren responded

    This item is still under review. No new updates at this time.
    -Warren

    SjoerdV supported this idea  · 
  18. 1,823 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    298 comments  ·  Public » Files  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    working on it  ·  Warren responded

    This feature request is still in the works. I hope to have more updates soon. I’ll keep you posted.
    -Warren

    SjoerdV commented  · 

    Yes please! Our users are actively asking questions about this, so this is a very common request, why not take the default sort order as it is defined in the SharePoint library? Should be easy enough...

    SjoerdV commented  · 

    It's only a sort order guys... this should have been added ages ago

  19. 557 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    78 comments  ·  Public » People  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    SjoerdV supported this idea  · 
  20. 12,174 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1342 comments  ·  Public » UX/Design  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    SjoerdV supported this idea  · 
← Previous 1 3 4

Feedback and Knowledge Base