SjoerdV

My feedback

  1. 48 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    12 comments  ·  Public » Guest Access  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    SjoerdV supported this idea  · 
  2. 21 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Public » Files  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    SjoerdV supported this idea  · 
  3. 533 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    83 comments  ·  Public » Teams and Channels  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    SjoerdV supported this idea  · 
  4. 1,938 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    298 comments  ·  Public » Messaging  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    under review  ·  Warren responded

    This item is still under review. No new updates at this time.
    -Warren

    SjoerdV supported this idea  · 
  5. 1,506 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    253 comments  ·  Public » Files  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    working on it  ·  Warren responded

    This feature request is still in the works. I hope to have more updates soon. I’ll keep you posted.
    -Warren

    SjoerdV commented  · 

    Yes please! Our users are actively asking questions about this, so this is a very common request, why not take the default sort order as it is defined in the SharePoint library? Should be easy enough...

    SjoerdV commented  · 

    It's only a sort order guys... this should have been added ages ago

  6. 416 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    58 comments  ·  Public » People  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    SjoerdV supported this idea  · 
  7. 11,210 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1252 comments  ·  Public » UX/Design  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    SjoerdV supported this idea  · 
  8. 24,681 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    2023 comments  ·  Public » Teams and Channels  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    We acknowledge the customer demand for Private Channels and have been hard at work on it. Private Channels is currently in preview with a select group of customers. We expect to release the feature to the public later this Fall, and will update here when we are starting to roll out to all customers. We appreciate all the feedback you have provided to us on this forum and thank you for your patience.

    ~Alex

    SjoerdV supported this idea  · 
  9. 3,218 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    271 comments  ·  Public » Messaging  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    SjoerdV supported this idea  · 
  10. 207 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    16 comments  ·  Public » Performance  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    SjoerdV supported this idea  · 
  11. 236 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    under review  ·  40 comments  ·  Public » Files  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    SjoerdV supported this idea  · 
  12. 24 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    4 comments  ·  Public » Teams and Channels  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    SjoerdV supported this idea  · 
  13. 6 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Public » Files  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    SjoerdV supported this idea  · 
  14. 2,143 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    297 comments  ·  Public » Messaging  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    try this instead  ·  Suphatra responded

    Hey everyone! We have this already. Just click the ellipses next to the thread name and select “Hide”.

    Note that we cannot provide a “hard delete” due to eDiscovery and other legal reasons.

    Thanks,
    Suphatra

    SjoerdV supported this idea  · 
  15. 12,292 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    996 comments  ·  Public » Teams and Channels  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    We know you are patiently waiting for this feature. This feature is being implemented in stages. Fast tenant switching is currently in testing both internally and with early customers. We expect to release to the public in the Fall. I’ll post an update once it’s rolling out.

    Full multi-tenant, multi-user support will be added after fast tenant switching.

    ~Alex

    SjoerdV commented  · 

    Logging in with multiple account = yes please!

    SHARED CHANNELS ACROSS TEAMS should be a different uservoice, it describes something entirely different

    SjoerdV supported this idea  · 
  16. 4,665 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    326 comments  ·  Public » Teams and Channels  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    working on it  ·  Suphatra responded

    Thanks for following our suggestion to vote this up on SharePoint. It worked! SharePoint has confirmed that they have already started working on this and I’ll be getting an ETA from them after the holidays. -Suphatra

    SjoerdV commented  · 

    This has already created such a mess, that by default we do not allow any team members to create channels, limiting the business to help itself and reducing agility... 2.5 years later and still no solution. I would be happy with just a backend solution so we can just synchronize the names on demand through management shell or something. MS please give some urgency here.

    SjoerdV commented  · 

    ETA please!

    SjoerdV commented  · 

    Need a fix soon, please! Renaming channels is a constant and not having the SharePoint folder renamed really complicates things.

    SjoerdV supported this idea  · 
  17. 177 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    28 comments  ·  Public » Files  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    SjoerdV supported this idea  · 
  18. 1,001 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    161 comments  ·  Public » Notifications  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    under review  ·  Warren responded

    This item is still being reviewed and pending a decision. No new details at this time.

    -Warren

    SjoerdV supported this idea  · 
  19. 18 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    2 comments  ·  Public » Teams and Channels  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    SjoerdV supported this idea  · 
  20. 50 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    16 comments  ·  Public » Teams and Channels  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    SjoerdV commented  · 

    Microsoft fails basic programming etiquette once again with Teams. Making display names a dependency in the behind the scenes plumbing is bad practice, and it was already so since... EVER!!!!. Please grow up, it's 2019 and still those rookie mistakes!

    SjoerdV supported this idea  · 
← Previous 1 3

Feedback and Knowledge Base



You are about to visit the UserVoice site for Microsoft Teams

We have partnered with UserVoice, a 3rd party service providing public discussion forums for product-specific feedback.

By clicking "Continue to UserVoice" you agree to UserVoice's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.