Anonymous

My feedback

  1. 483 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    93 comments  ·  Public » Messaging  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  2. 51 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    13 comments  ·  Public » Bugs  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  3. 8,951 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    942 comments  ·  Public » UX/Design  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  4. 2,596 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    495 comments  ·  Public » Messaging  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
    Anonymous commented  · 

    ^^bump^^ +1 vote from my Org

  5. 1 vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Public » Teams and Channels  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous shared this idea  · 
  6. 173 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    22 comments  ·  Public » Teams and Channels  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  7. 91 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    6 comments  ·  Public » Mobile  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    working on it  ·  Warren responded

    Updating this topic to reflect that the focus is now on the additional search functionality since the other pieces of the original request have been completed.

    Here is the originally summary below:
    Items 2, 3, 4, and 5 have been completed and released.

    Android/mobile app:
    1) universal search function for files, messages, chats, and groups
    2) directly send invite to join teams, instead of chat only option
    3) ability to create new team, project, or group
    4) view calendar/schedule inside app

    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  8. 10,914 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    953 comments  ·  Public » Calendar  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous commented  · 

    Hi.Suphatra,

    I am in the High Tech Semiconductor distribution business. We span more than 10 countries and you can only imagine the employees size, so I would like to have the opportunity to test this before it becomes "Cast in stone".

    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  9. 5 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Public » Mobile  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous shared this idea  · 
  10. 130 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    8 comments  ·  Public » Meetings  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous commented  · 

    Hi There. I seriously think Microsoft should provide an option for "group chats" (defined as more than 2 users in a chat) and enable the original creator of the chat, to boot someone out.

    There are many use cases why this is so:
    1. When team members leave a team and work in a different focus group
    2. When employees transfer to another subsidary
    3. When there is an abusive participant and needs to be booted

    If Microsoft truly only wanted to limit the group admin functions to teams, then I would suggest you just Disable the group private chat function, and keep it 1-to-1.

    As TEAMS transitions into a full fledged client having full features of Skype4Biz in Q4 2018/Q1 2019, imagine calling a conferencing by pressing the "call button" in the group chat. This then becomes that "Group conference" function, but lacks the full function of skype4biz where conference calls have a presenter, and a participant segregation.

    This chat function is not a simple after thought, and should not be treated as such.


    Since Microsoft is serious about being on-par, and BETTER than #SLACK because of the full integration of Skype4Biz into the Teams client, then it should deliver as intended, and not limit the way Enterprise and organisations work, but be fluid and Evolve their application together.

  11. 1 vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Public » Search  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous shared this idea  · 
  12. 4,026 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    138 comments  ·  Public » Calendar  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    working on it  ·  Suphatra responded

    Sorry for the delay on an update on this one! I’m hunting down the status for you and will update once I have it.

    Also, if you are interested in participating in testing or surveys for this, just tweet me at @skprufo.

    Suphatra

    Anonymous supported this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base



You are about to visit the UserVoice site for Microsoft Teams

We have partnered with UserVoice, a 3rd party service providing public discussion forums for product-specific feedback.

By clicking "Continue to UserVoice" you agree to UserVoice's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.