Andrew

My feedback

  1. 73 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    19 comments  ·  Public » Interoperability  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Andrew commented  · 

    I've noticed that referential integrity is a huge issue throughout Teams, any update on this one?

    Andrew supported this idea  · 
  2. 1,768 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    88 comments  ·  Public » Guest Access  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    working on it  ·  Warren responded

    Still in the works, no additional details are available yet.

    -Warren

    Andrew commented  · 

    Hi Warren,

    Can you please provide an update on this? Is it in active development or ... ?

    I'm being asked to create a joint (MS Teams/Sharepoint) structure for this and because there's no merge function yet or other ability to move things around in teams, I need to know if I have to build individual teams or can use channel level permissions at any point in the near future.

    Thanks,
    Andrew

    Andrew supported this idea  · 
  3. 82 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    under review  ·  8 comments  ·  Public » Planner  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Andrew supported this idea  · 
  4. 44 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    6 comments  ·  Public » Teams and Channels  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Andrew supported this idea  · 
  5. 262 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    21 comments  ·  Public » Teams and Channels  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    declined  ·  Warren responded

    I hate to bear bad news but this feature request has been declined by the feature team.

    -Warren

    Andrew supported this idea  · 
  6. 2,147 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    298 comments  ·  Public » Messaging  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    try this instead  ·  Suphatra responded

    Hey everyone! We have this already. Just click the ellipses next to the thread name and select “Hide”.

    Note that we cannot provide a “hard delete” due to eDiscovery and other legal reasons.

    Thanks,
    Suphatra

    Andrew commented  · 

    Please consider compliance issues.

    Many times our organization is required to be able to provide documentation of our work, which users being able to delete whole conversations would complicate substantially.

    At a minimum, it needs to be (a) something we can disable and (b) something where we can get a log of deleted messages in the event of lawsuits or other such events.

    Thanks in advance.

  7. 1,485 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    183 comments  ·  Public » UX/Design  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Andrew supported this idea  · 
  8. 1,683 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    76 comments  ·  Public » Planner  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Andrew supported this idea  · 
  9. 2,695 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    254 comments  ·  Public » Messaging  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    working on it  ·  Suphatra responded

    So happy to share that this is off the backlog and we are actively working on it!

    -Suphatra

    Andrew commented  · 

    Respectfully disagree
    Read receipts have many issues of their own and asking that people check the 'thumbs up' gets you the same thing here. Having to manage read receipts is an email function I think we would actively want to avoid for us in Teams. If implemented, please ensure we can freeze it out for the whole org.

  10. 3,105 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    205 comments  ·  Public » Search  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    planned  ·  Warren responded

    This feature request has moved to the planning stage. There have also been several small updates that have gone out already, as well.

    I’ll keep you posted as I hear more about coming updates.

    -Warren

    Andrew supported this idea  · 
  11. 1,967 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    259 comments  ·  Public » UX/Design  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    under review  ·  Warren responded

    This feature is still being reviewed by the feature team. No decision has been made yet. I’ll keep you posted.

    -Warren

    Andrew commented  · 

    Respectfully Disagree
    They serve very different functions. The teams area is a public conversation, the chat is a private one. Having separation is a good thing for our organization. I know some people like Slack, but it doesn't have to be that way... it can be better.

  12. 2,548 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    140 comments  ·  Public » Planner  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    working on it  ·  Warren responded

    This is still being worked upon. I hope to have more details in the next couple months.

    Please know the team is actively working on this feature.
    -Warren

    Andrew supported this idea  · 
  13. 4,682 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    327 comments  ·  Public » Teams and Channels  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    working on it  ·  Suphatra responded

    Thanks for following our suggestion to vote this up on SharePoint. It worked! SharePoint has confirmed that they have already started working on this and I’ll be getting an ETA from them after the holidays. -Suphatra

    Andrew supported this idea  · 
  14. 2,419 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    67 comments  ·  Public » Notifications  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Andrew supported this idea  · 
  15. 3,382 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    118 comments  ·  Public » Meetings  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Andrew supported this idea  · 
  16. 2,817 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    226 comments  ·  Public » Emojis and GIFs  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Andrew commented  · 

    Respectfully disagree
    Please keep thumbs up as a single-call out, we can always reply with whatever content we want, but it is useful for our organization to have a simple "I've read this" response - which is what we're training our team to use MS Teams for. If you do make a change, please have an added 'reaction' to the thumbs or change the thumbs to a 'check' or something like that.

    Also, this would needless complicate the UI layout with reams of faces, I cannot imagine it's worth the engineer's time to do this just to be like Slack.

  17. 4,430 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    147 comments  ·  Public » Calendar  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    working on it  ·  Suphatra responded

    Sorry for the delay on an update on this one! I’m hunting down the status for you and will update once I have it.

    Also, if you are interested in participating in testing or surveys for this, just tweet me at @skprufo.

    Suphatra

    Andrew supported this idea  · 
  18. 5,428 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    506 comments  ·  Public » Teams and Channels  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Andrew supported this idea  · 
    Andrew commented  · 

    This feature also serves as a work-around for the sharepoint issues. You could create a set of triggers:

    a) when you rename the sharepoint folder, it creates a duplicate team channel and moves all the location pointers as appropriate; and

    b) when you go to move a team - it creates a duplicate sharepoint site and file library (including versioning and so on) under the new name and deletes the old one.

  19. 5,055 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    300 comments  ·  Public » Files  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    on the backlog  ·  Warren responded

    This feature request is still on in the backlog. No new updates available at this time.

    -Warren

    Andrew supported this idea  · 
  20. 5,361 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    89 comments  ·  Public » Planner  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    working on it  ·  Warren responded

    This is still being worked upon. I hope to have more details in the next couple months.

    Please know the team is actively working on this feature.
    -Warren

    Andrew supported this idea  · 
← Previous 1

Feedback and Knowledge Base



You are about to visit the UserVoice site for Microsoft Teams

We have partnered with UserVoice, a 3rd party service providing public discussion forums for product-specific feedback.

By clicking "Continue to UserVoice" you agree to UserVoice's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.