Mark Moore

My feedback

  1. 2,811 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    362 comments  ·  Public » Files  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Mark Moore commented  · 

    @jesse Walter - I think you are missing the point. The current functionality only allows the addition of whole document libraries to the files section, we want to be able to include at the "folder" level. We have been using teams for 3 and a half years across multiple projects and have many, many teams. Consider the scenario of delivering a new hospital system to a client, and in the document library there are multiple folders for "Inpatients", "Outpatients", "Radiology" etc. Now repeat this team for each new client. Now consider a project that is focusing specifically on Radiology, imagine the benefit for a new project/team too be able to add just the Radiology related folders from across 10 different previous projects.

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Mark Moore commented  · 

    @simon sabin - That's not a solution, its a small scale work around at best, that negates the whole point of the proper solution. If I have a separate tab for another Sharepoint sites its separate from the rest of the channels document. If I want 6 separate document libraries to be added, I need 6 tabs! "why would you want 6 document libraries adding" I can hear the question .... because the whole point of teams is to consolidate people and resources for a given task without having to copy, rewrite or reinvent the wheel. So its not only possible, its extremely likely there will be multiple resources spread out across the company that would benefit the tam by being under the "files tab", eg Reference documents to tools the team may use. Reference to previous POC's elsewhere etc etc

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Mark Moore commented  · 

    The regular updates from Warren initially were good, every 3 months or so. Now nothing for close to 2 years? What's the point of using Uservoice if you are not going to at least keep the user base informed?

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Mark Moore commented  · 

    Big thumbs up for this. Adding another library is good but if its the whole library, it can simply add more confusion because of the amount of other folders you DON'T want adding to the view

    Mark Moore supported this idea  · 
  2. 7 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    3 comments  ·  Bug Reports » Notifications  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Mark Moore commented  · 

    @thom - This happens whilst I am chatting to the person in the popped out window, that's the issue, so every sentence we type to each other, we get a banner pop up even though our chat is live and ongoing

    Mark Moore shared this idea  · 
  3. 226 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    30 comments  ·  Public » Files  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Mark Moore commented  · 

    It is odd that this functionality has still not been implemented still or any input from Microsoft in here. Adding links to Sharepoint document libraries was and still is an awesome way to prevent file duplication across libraries, the link that appears in teams is not in the least bit functionally. Please give us some feedback! Will see if I can mobilize my company to increase the vote count :)

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Mark Moore commented  · 

    What is so bad about NOT having this feature is that if users have used the SharePoint document library in the background and used the "new" button to add a link to a file, it works perfectly in SharePoint, so they are happy. Next person comes along in MS Teams and the get an awful experience when they click the link in the files section of teams. This should have been addressed by now

    Mark Moore supported this idea  · 
  4. 257 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    52 comments  ·  Public » Meetings  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Mark Moore commented  · 

    This is a classic case of MS not listening to what people really wanted on the original uservoice where they say it was implemented. Please revisit this request and implement on a per user level - https://microsoftteams.uservoice.com/forums/555103-public/suggestions/18648022-start-a-meeting-with-the-mic-muted-like-skype-and

    Mark Moore supported this idea  · 
  5. 2,810 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    292 comments  ·  Public » Notifications  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Once support for Windows 10 native notifications is released, users who choose to use Windows notifications will be able to utilize Windows OS specific settings for the length of time to display notifications. Mac does not have an OS specific setting, so will not have the support.

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Mark Moore commented  · 

    Coming back to check on this and was hoping for a better update that this :(
    It is pretty pathetic to be honest and the whole functionality makes me wonder if the devs and the users have a different view of the requirements. Imagine if in outlook every time your mouse passed over an email it set it to read and you missed the email..... One of my roles is to be a collaboration Champion for Microsoft O365 products, and I believe our company is the second largest user of MS Teams in the world behind Microsoft. This is a serious and major issue. At a time when we are looking to decide what our main communication platform will be moving forwards, this does not look good for Teams, which is a shame, because one poorly implemented major feature, could kill the great work elsewhere in the product

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Mark Moore commented  · 

    Indeed this is ridiculous - Having just come back from a few days holiday I had over 50 notifications (which is normal and am fine with that) but the fact notifications become "read" as I hover over them, or jumping to notifications in different parts of the list makes others "read" means it is extremely easy to miss notifications and I have missed several that were important. Even marking them as "unread" to come back to later does not work, because the same thing happens when you come back. At the very least there should be an option to "not mark as read unless clicked on"

    Mark Moore supported this idea  · 
  6. 460 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    41 comments  ·  Public » Meetings  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Mark Moore supported this idea  · 
  7. 180 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    23 comments  ·  Public » Teams and Channels  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Mark Moore supported this idea  · 
  8. 2,863 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    395 comments  ·  Public » UX/Design  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Mark Moore commented  · 

    I also would like to down vote this idea. Conversations in Teams are viewable by anyone including people you add later to a team. These conversations are potentially a vast supply of knowledge relating specifically to the team. Chat is for private conversations between specific individuals. I would go so far as to say that if you are conducting "chats" related to work/project decisions, that is a backward collaboration step and simply persists the age old "empire building" and "knowledge is power" culture, where only the chosen few know what's going on

  9. 17,709 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1645 comments  ·  Public » UX/Design  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Mark Moore supported this idea  · 
  10. 181 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    32 comments  ·  Public » Teams and Channels  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Mark Moore commented  · 

    Agreed. this is a massive issue and a poor implementation of yammer integration into the wider toolset

    Mark Moore supported this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base