Unfortunately we hit some snags and this has moved back to “working on it”. The team is working to make some corrections and I hope to have a release date in the near future. I’ll keep you posted with what I hear.
If the invite link is the "answer" to this, you are definitely not listening to what everyone is saying. To drive adoption, we want people to find the Team, request access vs. having to invite someone. This is the methodology used in many public Group scenarios (facebook, LinkedIn, etc) - maybe the core code could be borrowed from LinkedIn to accelerate availability
Please allow the browsing of both public AND private teams. For private teams, if someone requests to add, just make an owner approve it.
Without being able to see the list of existing teams, the default human behavior is to create a new one, as my desired team obviously doesn't exist. This completely defeats the intended purpose of teams.
I agree with the integration ideas suggested here, as well as the ability to create a tab for Delve boards, similar to what you can do with Streams.