Brad Friedlander

My feedback

  1. 15 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Public » Teams and Channels  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Brad Friedlander supported this idea  · 
  2. 865 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    47 comments  ·  Public » Meetings  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Brad Friedlander commented  · 

    We need to be able to add an external person (e.g., a customer) using their real (own domain) email address to specific channels within a Team. This type of guess has no visibility or permissions without explicitly adding them (as opposed to Team members who have the same access to all channels).

    Brad Friedlander supported this idea  · 
  3. 4,878 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    445 comments  ·  Public » Teams and Channels  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Brad Friedlander commented  · 

    This is a frequent set of problem.

    As a rule, we want to start with a fairly broad channel and then split it if there is a sub-topic that warrants its own channel. Currently, you can't move the older conversations to the new channel.

    Starting a conversation in the wrong channel (or even wrong team) happens a lot. We need to be able to easily move it to the correct team and channel.

    Brad Friedlander commented  · 

    This is a frequent set of problem.

    As a rule, we want to start with a fairly broad channel and then split it if there is a sub-topic that warrants its own channel. Currently, you can't move the older conversations to the new channel.

    Starting a conversation in the wrong channel (or even wrong team) happens a lot. We need to be able to easily move it to the correct team and channel.

    Brad Friedlander supported this idea  · 
  4. 9,135 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1038 comments  ·  Public » Teams and Channels  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Brad Friedlander commented  · 

    This could be accomplished if there was an ability to archive a channel and then restore it to a different team.

    Brad Friedlander supported this idea  · 
  5. 6,508 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    569 comments  ·  Public » Performance  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Performance has been and continues to be a big focus area for Teams. One main area we have made improvements in is responsiveness for the most frequent user actions of switching between Chat, Channel, and Activity. We are also focused on reducing resource consumption and application load time. More improvements are on the way.

    ~Alex

    Brad Friedlander supported this idea  · 
  6. 8,452 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    547 comments  ·  Public » Teams and Channels  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Brad Friedlander supported this idea  · 
  7. 23,107 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1885 comments  ·  Public » Teams and Channels  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    We acknowledge the customer demand for Private Channels and have been hard at work on it. Private Channels is currently in preview with a select group of customers. We expect to release the feature to the public later this Fall, and will update here when we are starting to roll out to all customers. We appreciate all the feedback you have provided to us on this forum and thank you for your patience.

    ~Alex

    Brad Friedlander supported this idea  · 
  8. 722 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    78 comments  ·  Public » Desktop  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    working on it  ·  Suphatra responded

    Hi everyone, the engineer working on this item has left the company and we’re working on replacing him. I wanted to give you that heads up because the work has paused, which extends our shipping date.

    I really appreciate your patience as we work to get this back to actively worked on.

    Suphatra

    Brad Friedlander supported this idea  · 
  9. 9 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    4 comments  ·  Public » Mac  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Brad Friedlander commented  · 

    I agree. There's needs to be a way to link to an existing file or One Note without displaying a long URL. It would also be useful to preview the content (first few line?) when viewing he conversation message.

  10. 4,887 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    81 comments  ·  Public » Planner  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    working on it  ·  Warren responded

    This is still being worked upon. I hope to have more details in the next couple months.

    Please know the team is actively working on this feature.
    -Warren

    Brad Friedlander supported this idea  · 
  11. 10,924 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    954 comments  ·  Public » Calendar  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Brad Friedlander supported this idea  · 
  12. 532 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    87 comments  ·  Public » Messaging  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    declined  ·  Suphatra responded

    We’re fixing bugs identified in the comments, and other user reports we’ve received around markdown, but we’ve decided we’re not going to fundamentally change our markdown support.

    This is the first time we’ve declined a request, and it didn’t come easily. We weighed this against other important features we’re working on to deliver and we had to make some tough choices.

    Really appreciate your understanding on this, and please feel free to ping me if you have any questions, complaints, or need to rant.

    Suphatra

    Brad Friedlander supported this idea  · 
  13. 822 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    151 comments  ·  Public » Teams and Channels  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    needs your feedback  ·  Suphatra responded

    Hi folks, we are collecting feedback on this so we can determine prioritization and user need.

    Please comment in the thread below about how this affects you, how you currently add members, and who you think would benefit from this in your organization.

    Thank you!

    Brad Friedlander commented  · 

    It would be helpful to handle local DLs (i.e., those that are not in AD). If there is no Exchange/Office DL in AD, then the only option seems to be adding one at a time.

  14. 1,120 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    declined  ·  37 comments  ·  Public » Messaging  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Brad Friedlander supported this idea  · 
  15. 1,687 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    74 comments  ·  Public » Teams and Channels  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    under review  ·  Warren responded

    This item is still under review by the feature team. I have no details as to when a decision might happen.

    -Warren

    Brad Friedlander supported this idea  · 
  16. 127 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    20 comments  ·  Public » Messaging  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Brad Friedlander shared this idea  · 
  17. 414 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    92 comments  ·  Public » Messaging  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    declined  ·  Suphatra responded

    Thanks everyone for the clarifications to this request. Upon further technical review, we have decided to decline this request at this time.

    Please continue to contribute your ideas — they push us to innovate, problem solve, and really understand your needs.

    Thank you!
    Suphatra

    Brad Friedlander supported this idea  · 
  18. 10,996 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    894 comments  ·  Public » Teams and Channels  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    We know you are patiently waiting for this feature. This feature is being implemented in stages. Fast tenant switching is currently in testing both internally and with early customers. We expect to release to the public in the Fall. I’ll post an update once it’s rolling out.

    Full multi-tenant, multi-user support will be added after fast tenant switching.

    ~Alex

    Brad Friedlander supported this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base



You are about to visit the UserVoice site for Microsoft Teams

We have partnered with UserVoice, a 3rd party service providing public discussion forums for product-specific feedback.

By clicking "Continue to UserVoice" you agree to UserVoice's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.