Steven Poessnecker

My feedback

  1. 1,526 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    116 comments  ·  Public » Teams and Channels  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    partially done  ·  Warren responded

    I’m switching the status to Partially Done.

    The request for a Preview Team is still in the works. No new information is available at this time.

    Team Discoverability is still being worked upon, no details are available at this time. If you support this idea please navigate over to the main topic and vote for it! https://microsoftteams.uservoice.com/forums/555103/

    Change Prompt: this has been completed
    -Warren

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Steven Poessnecker commented  · 

    I agree with Rob Wilde. First, how specifically does this work? Is this the "search" for an existing team but you have to be in the "Add Team" function first? Or is the functionality that you are indicating something completely different?

    If it is the former, several things that I have issue with this:
    1) I shouldn't have to go to the "Add team" function before I can search for a team. It's not intuitive AT ALL.
    2) I do want to give users the ability to browser through the list of public teams and channels to see what's available. Otherwise, you are relying on people know "what" and "how" to search for the right teams before they create something new.
    1) I h

    Steven Poessnecker supported this idea  · 
  2. 9,074 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1108 comments  ·  Public » Wiki  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Steven Poessnecker supported this idea  · 
  3. 9 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Public » Messaging  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Steven Poessnecker supported this idea  · 
  4. 159 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    under review  ·  5 comments  ·  Public » Planner  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Steven Poessnecker supported this idea  · 
  5. 281 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    working on it  ·  47 comments  ·  Public » IT Pro  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Steven Poessnecker supported this idea  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Steven Poessnecker commented  · 

    We've heard that there is a 6 month rolling history for chats. However, we need to understand what that really means: Is it the active conversation (meaning there is no dropoff as long as the conversation is added/changed every day) or overall (i.e. it doesn't matter by conversation - it's just chats things drop off at a rolling 6 months). Please provide some clarification on this.

Feedback and Knowledge Base