Martin Schmidt

My feedback

  1. 2,894 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    262 comments  ·  Public » Messaging  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    working on it  ·  Suphatra responded

    So happy to share that this is off the backlog and we are actively working on it!

    -Suphatra

    Martin Schmidt commented  · 

    I definitely think this is a must. The way WhatsApp does is great. For Team Channels, how Cisco Spark does it also works. It's not a perfect solution but it's better than nothing. This is necessary for big teams spread across different locations. Please re prioritize!

    Martin Schmidt supported this idea  · 
  2. 368 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    92 comments  ·  Public » Teams and Channels  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    declined  ·  Warren responded

    This request has been declined by the feature team.

    Private channels may help with items such as this request once they are released. The Private channel topic is tracked at http://microsoftteams.uservoice.com/forums/555103/suggestions/16911079

    Please note the handling of “Guest Accounts” is a separate ask and can be found at: https://microsoftteams.uservoice.com/forums/555103-public/suggestions/16911109-guest-access

    The request about “Guest Access at the Channel” level is being tracked by this request: https://microsoftteams.uservoice.com/forums/555103-public/suggestions/31374577-guest-access-should-be-implemented-at-the-channel

    Thank you all for the feedback.
    -Warren

    Martin Schmidt commented  · 

    A perfect example is when you have a team who has to create rapid action teams to solve specific issues. It would be helpful to create a channel inside their own team for each issue and invite people who need to participate on solving these issues. They might not be part of the Team itself and the Team might not want those users to access all the channels on the team. Another way to solve this is to create separate Team for this, but it might be an overkill.

  3. 3 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Public » Interoperability  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Martin Schmidt shared this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base