Henry Morland

My feedback

  1. 587 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    110 comments  ·  Public » Files  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    declined  ·  Warren responded

    I hate to be the bearer of bad news, but this feature request has been declined.

    -Warren

    Henry Morland supported this idea  · 
  2. 23,085 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1885 comments  ·  Public » Teams and Channels  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    We acknowledge the customer demand for Private Channels and have been hard at work on it. Private Channels is currently in preview with a select group of customers. We expect to release the feature to the public later this Fall, and will update here when we are starting to roll out to all customers. We appreciate all the feedback you have provided to us on this forum and thank you for your patience.

    ~Alex

    Henry Morland commented  · 

    This would be hugely useful to me - to include external stakeholders on a project by project basis without having to add them to the team

    Henry Morland supported this idea  · 
  3. 368 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    92 comments  ·  Public » Teams and Channels  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    declined  ·  Warren responded

    This request has been declined by the feature team.

    Private channels may help with items such as this request once they are released. The Private channel topic is tracked at http://microsoftteams.uservoice.com/forums/555103/suggestions/16911079

    Please note the handling of “Guest Accounts” is a separate ask and can be found at: https://microsoftteams.uservoice.com/forums/555103-public/suggestions/16911109-guest-access

    The request about “Guest Access at the Channel” level is being tracked by this request: https://microsoftteams.uservoice.com/forums/555103-public/suggestions/31374577-guest-access-should-be-implemented-at-the-channel

    Thank you all for the feedback.
    -Warren

    Henry Morland commented  · 

    Reading through my comment again, the more common requirement is to invite internal stakeholders into a channel - that is to say people who are not in the IT team but who are involved in the development of a specific new capability.

    Henry Morland commented  · 

    I have an department (set up as a team) running various projects (set up as channels).

    What I would dearly love to be able to do is invite individuals outside the team to join a project (channel)

    For example, one of our projects is to roll out Office 365. MS Teams is a very good tool for managing the various elements of this project - notes, chat, planner, documents etc.

    The obvious thing to do is to set this up as a channel. However, because we have engaged an external consultant to help us with the transition, we have to set it up as a team instead.

    This requirement is very common as most of our projects involve a few individuals outside our core team: stakeholders and/or people with special skills brought in on a project basis.

    For this reason I think it would be very useful to invite people outside the core team to join a channel.

Feedback and Knowledge Base



You are about to visit the UserVoice site for Microsoft Teams

We have partnered with UserVoice, a 3rd party service providing public discussion forums for product-specific feedback.

By clicking "Continue to UserVoice" you agree to UserVoice's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.