Stephen Smith

My feedback

  1. 2,570 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    458 comments  ·  Public » Teams and Channels  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Stephen Smith supported this idea  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Stephen Smith commented  · 

    Or allow the Team owner themselves to bulk add members via the Teams 'Add Member' interface.
    Importantly, the option ought to be made possible also for adding guest users (where allow external guests is enabled in the tenant) so that the correct invitation process is triggered to them. Some organisations don't have capacity in terms of Sys admins to do this with Powershell or via Azure B2B for any department across the organisation, on demand or the developers/tools to build an in-house process to automate it.

  2. 7 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Public » Teams and Channels  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Stephen Smith supported this idea  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Stephen Smith commented  · 

    Surprised there's not much support on this from Education, the built in templates are never going to satisfy HE for adoption of Teams to collaborate, particularly those not ready./ not planning to integrate Turnit-in for Assignments and as an EDU tenant you cannot remove Assignments unless you hack the policies and assign an unsupported policy. To have no option to create a custom template to help manage a Teams for Teaching usecase, is a barrier to adoption of it as a useful collaboration space to aid teaching.

  3. 13 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Schools and Universities » Teams & Channels  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Stephen Smith supported this idea  · 
  4. 3 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Schools and Universities » Calendar  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Stephen Smith shared this idea  · 
  5. 118 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    9 comments  ·  Public » Meetings  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Stephen Smith commented  · 

    Depending upon the license users are on E.g. if users are on an A1 license - nobody can delete the recording for up to 21 days.

    Stephen Smith supported this idea  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Stephen Smith commented  · 

    Before anyone in a meeting starts a recording, all participants should be explicitly informed that the meeting is about to be recorded and presented with the option to accept this and stay in the meeting or by choosing to decline, they leave the meeting. At the moment we rely upon meeting organisers finding guidance about verbally doing this.

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Stephen Smith commented  · 

    Also, If a meeting host doesn't explicitly limit who can present at their meeting, anyone can start recording and whilst everyone is notified after it's started, there's no record of who actually started the recording.

  6. 149 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    20 comments  ·  Public » IT Pro  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Stephen Smith supported this idea  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Stephen Smith commented  · 

    Need to be able to show a forward schedule of all Teams Live Events scheduled. The report is there in the M365 Admin portal but is only browsable - you cannot export the data. Better still, if the data could be read into PowerBI, this would be useful for sharing company wide for better planning. At the moment it all has to be done manually by hand. This is a barrier for wider adoption of the products in the M365 suite due to lack of integration and automation capabilities.

  7. 2,619 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    267 comments  ·  Public » Live Events  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Stephen Smith supported this idea  · 
  8. 851 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    112 comments  ·  Public » Meetings  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Stephen Smith supported this idea  · 
  9. 77 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    3 comments  ·  Public » Meetings  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Stephen Smith commented  · 

    We see 1st to raise their hand goes to the bottom of the list then subsequent hand raisers are in order from the top. However, even if this worked as intended, numbers with the hand would be helpful rather than rely purely on a visual check - especially if the list viewer sort is non-performant.

    Stephen Smith supported this idea  · 
  10. 361 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    32 comments  ·  Public » Meetings  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Stephen Smith commented  · 

    Meeting attendees are reporting that the 1st to raise their hand is put to the bottom of the attendee list whereas subsequent hand raisers are ordered from the top. More helpful to have a little marker with the hand showing the number order rather than rely upon by-sight alone. If the sorting is non-performant back in the list viewer, the ordering of hands raised is confusing if one appears at the bottom whilst others list in order at the top.

    Stephen Smith supported this idea  · 
  11. 7 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Public » Meetings  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Stephen Smith supported this idea  · 
  12. 16 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    2 comments  ·  Public » Meetings  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Stephen Smith shared this idea  · 
  13. 9 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Public » Meetings  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Stephen Smith supported this idea  · 
  14. 5 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    2 comments  ·  Public » Meetings  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Stephen Smith commented  · 

    The solution posted previously about who can record a meeting is not scalable or fit for purpose:
    https://microsoftteams.uservoice.com/forums/555103-public/suggestions/34787068-option-to-only-allow-meeting-organizer-to-record-v

    Because all people joining a meeting are presenters by default. This is the wrong way around, they should be attendees by default and the meeting owner should decide who will be presenters. If you have a Teams meeting with up to 200 participants, it's not feasible for the meeting organiser/owner to have to then demote their role to attendee to avoid them being able to start recording the meeting. If someone does start recording, there's no way to see who started the recording. This is forcing our meeting hosts to use Zoom Enterprise instead because the options are there to promote specific participants, rather than have to demote all participants 1 by 1

    Stephen Smith shared this idea  · 
  15. 6,301 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    911 comments  ·  Public » Teams and Channels  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Stephen Smith supported this idea  · 
  16. 8,220 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    886 comments  ·  Public » Calendar  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Stephen Smith supported this idea  · 
  17. 3,454 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    475 comments  ·  Public » Calendar  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Stephen Smith supported this idea  · 
  18. 57 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    5 comments  ·  Public » Meetings  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Stephen Smith supported this idea  · 
  19. 343 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Stephen Smith supported this idea  · 
  20. 32 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    7 comments  ·  Public » Teams and Channels  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Stephen Smith supported this idea  · 
← Previous 1

Feedback and Knowledge Base