David
My feedback
-
376 votes17 comments · Public » Apps, Connectors, Messaging Extensions · Flag idea as inappropriate… · Admin →David
supported this idea
·
-
7,079 votes
Performance has been and continues to be a big focus area for Teams. One main area we have made improvements in is responsiveness for the most frequent user actions of switching between Chat, Channel, and Activity. We are also focused on reducing resource consumption and application load time. More improvements are on the way.
~Alex
David
supported this idea
·
-
7,851 votes
This feature item is still in the works. We will keep you posted as we have new info from the feature team.
~Alex
David
supported this idea
·
-
10,696 votes
We acknowledge the demand for this capability and are exploring the best possible solutions to enable this.
~Alex
David
supported this idea
·
-
11,214 votes
We’re currently working on defining a compact mode experience. I will post more details when we have more to share.
~Alex
David
commented
I still don't understand why we can't get a compact mode the size of the skype for business with the same UI as the iOS / Android client. The UI literally already exists for a compact mode. Make it an option then iterate on it some more.
I will say however that P2P chat expectially on desktop is bulky and cumbersome.. While replying inline to notifications is fine, composing and sending with ether a full compos or typing inline in the little box at the top of the screen is not handy, the UI in general needs to be streamlined.
One of the biggest complaints I have from users forced off of skype for business is that 1:1 chat is a giant leap backwards in usability.
Also to echo others this has been open FAR TOO LONG!
David
supported this idea
·
-
2,797 votes
Please check “Teams/Skype Consumer chat and calling interop” on the public roadmap at microsoft.com/microsoft-365/roadmap?filters.. for updates.
David
commented
I am guessing engineering has declined this since as a whole MS Sales teams still use Skype for Business and haven't noticed they can't contact small businesses or individual contractors directly in Teams.
David
supported this idea
·
-
129 votesDavid
supported this idea
·
-
193 votes
It looks like some people in the thread below have figured it out — we actually have this. You can start a chat both ways; the system will automatically recognize if this person is on Skype for Business or on Teams.
Thanks and let me know if you have any questions.
Suphatra
David
commented
I should add that even if my Org fully adopts teams I expect our contractors and partners to continue to use S4B for a long time (especially those with skype phone systems on prem), so interoperability is essential...
David
commented
Tried in teamsonly mode and islands mode. Does not work.
A user in teamsonly mode can receive from Skype. Sending to a user in islands mode still sends the message to teams.
There appears to be no way to message a federated partner using Skype for business.
Teams will not let me @message an address outside my org.
David
supported this idea
·
-
24,698 votes
We acknowledge the customer demand for Private Channels and have been hard at work on it. Private Channels is currently in preview with a select group of customers. We expect to release the feature to the public later this Fall, and will update here when we are starting to roll out to all customers. We appreciate all the feedback you have provided to us on this forum and thank you for your patience.
~Alex
David
supported this idea
·
-
273 votes
This feature is in final internal testing and will be released soon. We’ll update when it is closer to release.
David
supported this idea
·
-
403 votes
This feature request is still on the backlog. I’m waiting to hear more that I can share.
-WarrenDavid
supported this idea
·
-
318 votesDavid
supported this idea
·
-
465 votes
Good news, this feature has moved into the planning stages. I’ll keep you posted as we continue to move ahead in development.
-Warren
David
supported this idea
·
-
243 votes
I will be closing this topic since the feature request has been split apart into each individually requested item. This will allow you to see when items are actually closed out and moving ahead instead of having one item giving a perpetual misrepresentation of multiple pieces.
Please take the time to vote for each of these you are impacted by.
1) OSX client updates – app quits multiple times a day – https://microsoftteams.uservoice.com/forums/555103/suggestions/33838036
2) MAC app fails to update with standard account (needs admin creds) – https://microsoftteams.uservoice.com/forums/555103/suggestions/33838069 (This item is completed)
3) Update files are stored on the MAC taking up a lot of disk space – https://microsoftteams.uservoice.com/forums/555103/suggestions/33838114
4) Need prompt before updating on MAC – https://microsoftteams.uservoice.com/forums/555103/suggestions/33838126
5) After update on MAC – notifications are missed – https://microsoftteams.uservoice.com/forums/555103/suggestions/33838144 (This item is due to individual organizations not using modern authentication – once modern authentication is used, this issue will no longer…
David
supported this idea
·
-
354 votes
This is still being worked upon and making good progress! Stay tuned for additional updates.
-Warren
David
supported this idea
·
-
460 votes
This request is still being considered by the feature team but a final decision has not yet been made. I’m still awaiting more details.
-Warren
David
supported this idea
·
-
306 votesDavid
commented
This is a major hindrance to staff working on systems outside of IT control such as Guests invited into meetings or contractors working on a remote site joining a meeting and needing to SHARE content which is not possible via the web client.
There isn't a point in having a user mode installer if an Admin ACTION is still prompted after install!!!
This is Skype for business all over again!
Please look at the near frictionless experience of Webex / Zoom for group meetings of users without install privileges.
People joining conferences switch to other other products largely due to setup issues. If you have one participant struggling to connect the whole meeting gets derailed.
David
supported this idea
·
-
10,325 votes
Due to prioritization of other work-items this has been moved to the backlog. We will update when it is being actively worked on again.
~Alex
David
supported this idea
·
-
9,731 votes
We know many of you are waiting for a Teams client for Linux, and we’re pleased to confirm we’re actively working on it. Stay tuned for more information.
~Alex
David
supported this idea
·
-
488 votes
Thanks for the feedback.
We are considering a number of ways to better integrate experiences across Teams, Outlook, and other apps. However, we don’t have any specifics to share on this request.
-Warren
David
supported this idea
·
My system is fully up to date for Office 365. I can't understand how Teams is using DOUBLE the ram of Outlook at this point?
Chrome 478 MB
Teams 436 MB
Outlook 235 MB
Skype for Business 89.1 MB (Just launched it to check)