MarkT

My feedback

  1. 163 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    15 comments  ·  Public » Meetings  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    MarkT commented  · 

    It should be optional to include the entire team. We usually schedule meetings with smaller groups to discuss specific topics. The advantage of organizing the meeting from a Channel, or including the Channel is that the recording and details, notes will be available to the Channel automatically, so the entire Team would like to view the recording and details as well. Organizing a meeting from the Channel makes it also very convenient to be able to find the meeting recording and details. Currently, the whole team is invited because the Team is set as te organizer, instead the user that creates the meeting should be the organizer.

    MarkT supported this idea  · 
  2. 1,750 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    215 comments  ·  Public » Scheduling  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    MarkT supported this idea  · 
  3. 4,026 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    489 comments  ·  Public » Meetings  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    MarkT supported this idea  · 
  4. 1,728 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    142 comments  ·  Public » Meetings  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    MarkT supported this idea  · 
  5. 8,372 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1016 comments  ·  Public » Meetings  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    MarkT supported this idea  · 
  6. 55 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    7 comments  ·  Schools and Universities » UX & Design  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    MarkT supported this idea  · 
  7. 56 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    2 comments  ·  Public » Teams and Channels  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    MarkT supported this idea  · 
  8. 235 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    34 comments  ·  Public » Wiki  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    MarkT supported this idea  · 
  9. 616 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    77 comments  ·  Public » Wiki  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    on the backlog  ·  Warren responded

    This item is still on the backlog. No new details are available just yet.

    -Warren

    MarkT supported this idea  · 
  10. 568 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    93 comments  ·  Public » Wiki  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    MarkT supported this idea  · 
  11. 1,406 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    99 comments  ·  Public » Planner  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    MarkT supported this idea  · 
  12. 1,007 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    114 comments  ·  Public » Files  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    MarkT supported this idea  · 
  13. 1,845 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    242 comments  ·  Public » Wiki  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    on the backlog  ·  Warren responded

    This feature request is still on the backlog. No new information to share at this time.

    -Warren

    MarkT supported this idea  · 
  14. 1,911 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    301 comments  ·  Public » Desktop  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Thank you for your feedback, we are aware of the issues with language detection and are actively working on a fix that will again allow automatic spellchecking across multiple languages. Please note that the spell check is still working for the default language (the Teams app language). We will share an update as soon as one is available.

    MarkT supported this idea  · 
  15. 8,019 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    868 comments  ·  Public » Teams and Channels  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Thank you for your feedback! The team has reviewed this request and has added it to our backlog for both Standard (Public) to Private and Private to Standard (Public) channel conversion. We will share an update as soon as it’s available.

    MarkT supported this idea  · 
  16. 6,986 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    541 comments  ·  Public » Meetings  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    MarkT supported this idea  · 
  17. 2,378 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    under review  ·  176 comments  ·  Public » People  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    MarkT supported this idea  · 
  18. 47,680 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    4962 comments  ·  Public » Messaging  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    MarkT supported this idea  · 
  19. 162 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    20 comments  ·  Public » Interoperability  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    MarkT commented  · 

    Same here. I'm making an effort to push Teams within our company since I love it for collaboration. It is great that people can also use the native Apps, like OneNote, Word, and PPT, if they would like to. I also work with people that dislike Teams and love Slack. That should be okay. In my opinion, to make collaboration work, people need to be motivated and willing to use the tools or apps. People working together can solve the collaboration or communication problem. Processes or tools cannot solve them without people using it. So it should be okay for people to continue to use Slack if the company (IT) allows it. Forcing them to use an application like Teams will never work. As a result we will end-up still having to use two tools and Teams cannot become the central hub as intended. Outlook does have some integration with Slack, which is more than nothing, but I like to get people away from Outlook for short messages that clutter the inbox. Mio delivers great interoperability, but I work for HP Inc., and I don't think we will get IT to approve and implement it, since using Slack is already by IT exception. So to make progress and remove conflicts, I need proper interoperability between Slack and Teams. It is a missed opportunity if the reason behind not having an integration would be because of the competition between Teams and Slack. People should be able to choose the tools they like and still allow them to work with each other efficiently.

    MarkT supported this idea  · 
  20. 11,361 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    926 comments  ·  Public » Teams and Channels  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    if you have an existing post that you want to show in a different channel, you can edit the message and cross-post. This will add the top-level post to the different channel, but will not include the full set of replies. We will keep this request in mind as we evolve the cross-posting feature in the future and update if the status changes.

    Details on cross posting can be found here: https://support.office.com/article/cross-post-a-channel-conversation-in-teams-9c1252a3-67ef-498e-a7c1-dd7147b3d295.

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    MarkT commented  · 

    Cross-posting would only be useful for the occasional message that you want to share to another Team or Channel. But the requirement to move conversations to a different channel for me would be 1) To move a message that started in the wrong Team/ Channel together with all its replies. 2) Due change of focus/ priority or contributors we will need to be able to move the full post content from one Channel to another channel that may be part of a different Team. Similar to the option to move the files.

    MarkT supported this idea  · 
← Previous 1

Feedback and Knowledge Base