Daniel

My feedback

  1. 4,567 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    596 comments  ·  Public » Wiki  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    planned  ·  Warren responded

    This feature is still in the planning stage. No new updates are available at this time.

    -Warren

    Daniel supported this idea  · 
  2. 5,805 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    99 comments  ·  Public » Planner  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    working on it  ·  Warren responded

    This is still being worked upon. I hope to have more details in the next couple months.

    Please know the team is actively working on this feature.
    -Warren

    Daniel supported this idea  · 
  3. 796 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    on the backlog  ·  52 comments  ·  Public » Teams and Channels  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Daniel supported this idea  · 
  4. 368 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    92 comments  ·  Public » Teams and Channels  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    declined  ·  Warren responded

    This request has been declined by the feature team.

    Private channels may help with items such as this request once they are released. The Private channel topic is tracked at http://microsoftteams.uservoice.com/forums/555103/suggestions/16911079

    Please note the handling of “Guest Accounts” is a separate ask and can be found at: https://microsoftteams.uservoice.com/forums/555103-public/suggestions/16911109-guest-access

    The request about “Guest Access at the Channel” level is being tracked by this request: https://microsoftteams.uservoice.com/forums/555103-public/suggestions/31374577-guest-access-should-be-implemented-at-the-channel

    Thank you all for the feedback.
    -Warren

    Daniel commented  · 

    In our case we are multiple teams working on the same product. We have one private team for each one, and then one public for announcements etc.

    As an example, we have a channel for voting on lunch places where most of my team participates. We also, however, have one or two people from another team that also joins from time to time. They can however not be assigned to participate in our discussions as they are not part of our team.

    I don't want them to be part of our team (minimize amount of information), I don't want to have a cluttery channel in the announcement team (would like to keep it as clean as possible), and I don't want to create a public "Lunch team" (that's just ugly).

    As such, the best solution imo is to be able to invite other teams' members to channels. Alternatively introduce ability to create "Public Channels" for each team. That would create semi-public teams, where the team existence is known to all but the content to others is limited.

    Daniel supported this idea  · 
  5. 12,598 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1031 comments  ·  Public » Calendar  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Daniel supported this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base