Anonymous

My feedback

  1. 486 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    under review  ·  62 comments  ·  Public » Mobile  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  2. 568 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    135 comments  ·  Public » Mobile  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous commented  · 

    Read only? Really MS? This is basic, day 1 functionality...

  3. 135 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    22 comments  ·  Public » Meetings  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous commented  · 

    I think static conference id is the worst possible idea - my meetings are separate and especially given the fact that there is persistent chat associated with these meetings, they should all be separate. Having one static conference with all things mingled up would be insane for me.

    With respect to having weekly meetings, I am unsure why a recurring meeting is not the right solution. The meeting join link as well as the pstn conf-id would remain same.

  4. 7 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    5 comments  ·  Public » Teams and Channels  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous commented  · 

    The phone number is already clickable hyperlink with the meeting code embedded in there. Are you guys not able to click it?

  5. 3 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    2 comments  ·  Public » Meetings  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous commented  · 

    The phone numbers are already clickable and have the meeting code embedded so its already a one click join - what are you guys talking about?
    Could you maybe post a screenshot?

  6. 2,004 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    273 comments  ·  Public » Teams and Channels  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous commented  · 

    Hello,

    Any update on this? It's been 2 years since the original request and we're coming up to a year without feedback from the Microsoft team.

  7. 15,034 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1189 comments  ·  Public » Teams and Channels  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    As stated in the last update, the ability to use multiple Teams accounts at the same time is being implemented in stages for Desktop. Faster tenant switching functionality on the Windows client has been rolled out to the public ring fully, and Mac will begin rolling out soon. Work is in progress on cross-tenant notification improvements, and support for multiple accounts on desktop will follow. We’ll keep you posted!

    Note: The ability to use multiple Teams accounts at the same time is supported on iOS & Android today.

    Thanks,
    Alex & the Teams team

    Edited

    Anonymous commented  · 

    All the "Consultants" who are suffering. Everyone has this problem. Think outside the box - like consultant should do.

  8. 4 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Schools and Universities  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous shared this idea  · 
  9. 174 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Anonymous commented  · 

    Ye4s Please, we need this!!!

  10. 357 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    67 comments  ·  Public » Meetings  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    There are two parts to this topic:
    1) Bypass the lobby for PSTN: The ability for admins and organizers to be able to specify a meeting option to bypass the PSTN lobby independently of the VoIP lobby — This is supported in the public ring now.
    2) Admit from lobby for PSTN: Organizer having ability to admit PSTN attendees from the lobby, when the organizer has joined via PSTN with a PIN. – This is on the backlog. Please note: by choosing the meeting option to bypass the PSTN lobby, your attendees will join.

    Anonymous commented  · 

    Please check your TeamsMeetingPolicy - most likely AutoAdmittedUsers are only EveryoneInSameCompany - this means phone users (who are currently treated as anonymous users since there is no easy way to validate their identity), will wait in lobby till explicitly admitted.

  11. 841 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    202 comments  ·  Public » Presence  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    The team is happy to announce that this functionality is now available through the Presence Graph API which is now in public Beta! We have additional functionality planned for the API so please keep checking back for updates.

    Please note that this is a beta version of the API and may be subject to change. Use of these APIs in production applications is not supported.

    - Online documentation: https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/graph/api/resources/presence?view=graph-rest-beta

    Enjoy!

    Anonymous commented  · 

    yes pls

  12. 820 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    209 comments  ·  Public » Messaging  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    You should experience significant improvements in copy & paste of images within Teams, as well as to & from Teams. We are aware of a few remaining issues, but the most common cases are resolved.

    Thanks again for your patience on this one.

    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
    Anonymous commented  · 

    I suggest some automated regression tests for the future?

  13. 8,599 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    352 comments  ·  Public » Presence  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
    Anonymous commented  · 

    Still waiting. How hard can this be ?

  14. 7 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    8 comments  ·  Public » Messaging  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous commented  · 

    Some of the meme captions cover up the meme picture.

  15. 209 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    27 comments  ·  Public » Calling  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous commented  · 

    Hi, I came here looking for the same thing. If I am in a chat with someone and they ask a question, I might quickly hit "call" to answer the question by calling them. But Teams doesn't log that call. The next line would be the next chat and there is no record the call every took place. Skype shows all calls in line with chat as expected. Desperately missing from Teams.

  16. 282 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    51 comments  ·  Public » Messaging  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous commented  · 

    Yes! We have many contractors, customers etc that use public Skype. Not being able to communicate with them without using two separate platforms is hindering our adoption of the Teams app and we have 3,000 users. Come on MS, that would be a lot of licenses you'd sell!

  17. 6,086 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    451 comments  ·  Public » Teams and Channels  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous commented  · 

    For Heavens sake Microsoft.

    PAY FOR A TEAM TO REVIEW THE PRODUCT BEFORE LAUNCH.

    We the public are not your beta (or alpha in this case) testers.

  18. 1,566 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    261 comments  ·  Public » Notifications  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
    Anonymous commented  · 

    I wish there was at least a user setting that let this happen. It's annoying that I get added to a team and if I forget to follow it I will miss out on a day or more of posts until I remember to follow it.

Feedback and Knowledge Base