msimone68

My feedback

  1. 87 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    12 comments  ·  Public » Developer Platform  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    msimone68 supported this idea  · 
  2. 1,947 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    280 comments  ·  Public » Messaging  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    working on it  ·  Suphatra responded

    Thank you for your suggestion! We really appreciate the feedback and idea. We have reviewed this request and started working on it. I’ll let you know as it nears completion.

    Suphatra

    msimone68 supported this idea  · 
  3. 639 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    148 comments  ·  Public » Teams and Channels  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    partially done  ·  Warren responded

    As mentioned in the prior status, the channel limit was raised from 100 to 200.

    In the near future a retention limit will be set so you can still go back and reinstate a channel you had deleted. Once the retention period has expired then the channel will get a hard delete which will free up the space and no longer count toward the 200 channel limit.

    This will help with some of the issues you have voiced in the comments below.
    But I understand many of you wish the limit to be further increased. I will continue to provide your votes and comments to the feature team.

    -Warren

    msimone68 supported this idea  · 
  4. 11 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    2 comments  ·  Schools and Universities  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    msimone68 supported this idea  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    msimone68 commented  · 

    We don't even need it permanently removed. In our case we don't want to use actual calling in teams, but we do want to use the screen share feature (we know we need to "allow calling" to make that work). However, if there was a "tenant" teams option to just suppress that popup it would be ideal.

  5. 13 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    2 comments  ·  Public » IT Pro  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    msimone68 commented  · 

    This is becoming more critical as we rollout TEAMS. chat deletion should be added to the standard audit logging mechanism in O365. Currently, there is no way to find out who deleted a chat. Ediscovery and content search only provide what chat entries were made.

    msimone68 supported this idea  · 
  6. 29 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Public » IT Pro  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    msimone68 supported this idea  · 
  7. 1,235 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    384 comments  ·  Public » Presence  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Hi — My apologies for the delay in updating this item. We rolled out a fix a year ago for a specific issue of status changing to away in Teams when you were still active on the device. We thought this had fixed the “incorrect status” issue. From comments below, it sounds like people are still seeing issues.

    If you are still having issues, it would be super helpful if you can capture logs by typing Ctrl + Shift + Alt + 1, and send the file from your downloads folder along with device info and detailed repro steps to teamsml@microsoft.com.

    Thanks all!

    msimone68 supported this idea  · 
  8. 7,665 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    654 comments  ·  Public » Messaging  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    msimone68 supported this idea  · 
  9. 290 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    30 comments  ·  Public » Teams and Channels  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    msimone68 supported this idea  · 
  10. 24 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    3 comments  ·  Public » Messaging  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    msimone68 supported this idea  · 
  11. 18 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Public » UX/Design  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    msimone68 supported this idea  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    msimone68 commented  · 

    Agrred - It's great that user's can "Favorite" channels, chat's, and teams but there needs to be a way to manage what is in the favorites list or at least to view it, otherwise it becomes unmanageable.

  12. 31 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    5 comments  ·  Public » Tabs  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    msimone68 supported this idea  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    msimone68 commented  · 

    It would be much better if there was a tenant team option to select which TABS show up by default when a new TEAM is created. That would allow the flexibility for each tenant to default to whatever they want or neither (just have Conversation and Files for example). Not sure if "Files" is mandatory because it needs a place to store attachements to chat, but that would also be nice to remove if possible.

  13. 22 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    5 comments  ·  Public » Tabs  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    msimone68 commented  · 

    It would be much better if there was a tenant team option to select which TABS show up by default when a new TEAM is created. That would allow the flexibility for each tenant to default to whatever they want or neither (just have Conversation and Files for example). Not sure if "Files" is mandatory because it needs a place to store attachements to chat, but that would also be nice to remove if possible.

  14. 1,526 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    143 comments  ·  Public » Teams and Channels  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    on the backlog  ·  Warren responded

    This feature request is still working its way through the backlog queue.

    -Warren

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    msimone68 commented  · 

    This is a huge issue. The fact that you allow AD groups/DL's to be chosen means that the hook is already there. Not sure why the membership list has to be enumerated as that kind of defeats the prupose of how to manage it effectively.

    msimone68 supported this idea  · 
  15. 34 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    7 comments  ·  Public » IT Pro  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    msimone68 supported this idea  · 
  16. 4 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    2 comments  ·  Public » Notifications  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    msimone68 commented  · 

    After changing to Owner - it starts working for the user(s). Then when we set the user(s) back to "member" it continues to work. Seems like a wierd bug.

    msimone68 shared this idea  · 
  17. 1,455 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    113 comments  ·  Public » Teams and Channels  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    partially done  ·  Warren responded

    I’m switching the status to Partially Done.

    The request for a Preview Team is still in the works. No new information is available at this time.

    Team Discoverability is still being worked upon, no details are available at this time. If you support this idea please navigate over to the main topic and vote for it! https://microsoftteams.uservoice.com/forums/555103/

    Change Prompt: this has been completed
    -Warren

    msimone68 supported this idea  · 
  18. 129 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    12 comments  ·  Public » People  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    msimone68 commented  · 

    I would also like to see the conversation/persistent chats available in O365 search/Delve

    msimone68 supported this idea  · 
  19. 49 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Public » Interoperability  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    msimone68 supported this idea  · 
  20. 452 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    45 comments  ·  Public » IT Pro  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    needs your feedback  ·  Suphatra responded

    Hey everyone — Suphatra’s back! And I’m on the case with this item.

    I talked to engineering and I think they don’t understand this request. The requests says “Admin App” — do you mean Admin Center? The O365 portal?

    Also, what exactly do you envision for central administration — for example — what can you do now, can’t do, and would like to do with this new feature.

    Your feedback will help me get the team to put more resources into this. Thank you!

    Suphatra

    msimone68 supported this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base